Preview

Why Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary
Atomic Bomb Position Paper

Was the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? No, it was not. Neither of the two cities were military targets. Both cities had more civilians than troops. This would also mean that we broke the rules of war. We bombed innocent civilians. This, according to multiple documents of war, is illegal. Especially since the towns had no means of defending themselves. Bombing these towns also started the Cold war arms race. Everyone wanted the atomic bomb. I believe that the dropping the 2 bombs was not necessary because we killed innocent civilians, we started an arms race, and we ended a war that was already on the verge of ending itself. According to the Hague 2, the bombing of cities or towns that are not defended, and using a weapon to cause superfluous injury is prohibited during war. So, why did we drop the bombs then? We targeted innocent Japanese civilians for no absolute reason. Civilians outnumbered troops in both cities 5:1, therefore forfeiting them both as military targets. The 200,000 killed at both sites were not the only sufferers. The ones who survived had to live with serious defects, such as keloids, or several different diseases.
…show more content…
It was due to the simple “domino” effect. We used the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so Russia wanted it as well. They saw the destructive force of a $2,000,000,000 bomb, and realized that the United States could use it on them. This, in turn, caused the Cold War. The race to build a better, more chaotic bomb, went to the point of war and hatred. This was all linked to the first droppings of the A-bombs. It is my firm belief that the bombs dropped forcefully on the Japanese caused the United States of America to end one war, but start

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World War two almost immediately the United States and Russia started the Cold War. However some people might say that the cold war started on August 6, 1945 when the first atomic bomb was dropped. This makes President Truman’s decision to not only end the war with Japan and save American lives but also to try and scare Russia. “The view that it was purely coincidental that the first bomb was dropped two days before the Soviet offensive was due to start” (ideas in conflict 160). So because Russia had started their own Nuclear program it could cause problems for America in the future.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though the bomb killed many inocent civilians were killed, I believe that it was necessary because with out the dropping the war would have gone on, and more lives would have been taken on both sides. The Japanese had no means to stop in the war but the dropping of the bomb showed that the US had no means to stand down either and we would take the actions necessary to protect ourselves and make sure that the Germans and Japanese made no advances. I believe it was…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States felt it was important to drop the nuclear bombs on these two urban areas or it would endure more losses. Not exclusively could the lives of numerous fighters have been taken, yet potentially the lives of numerous pure Americans. The United States will dependably attempt to stay away from the loss of American regular folks no matter what, regardless of whether that implies taking existences of different nations innocent people. These occasions not just realized the surrender of Japan and a conclusion to World War II, however they additionally helped shape the idea of universal legislative issues for the following six decades.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the war continued, an invasion would be needed and such an invasion “… would have cost an estimated million casualties,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). It was even believed by President Truman “… that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). Even though the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, the quick end to the war they brought saved more lives in the long run than those that were lost in the…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to Karl T. Compton article “If the Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used,” Compton attempts to persuade readers that the atomic bombings were needed im to stop the war from causing further destruction. The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary in order to stop the war.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb was necessary in order to assure the war would end as soon as possible. On August 6th the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, on august 9th a second one was dropped on Nagasaki, and on August 10th Japan declared its intention to surrender. This is clear proof that atomic bomb was an effective way to end the war. Even if it did kill many people it might actually have killed less people then if we had kept the war going for much longer.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Europe, the war with Germany was over but Japan was still fighting. So the U.S could concreted on the war with Japan. The U.S had atomic bombs ready and a decision had to be made; should they sent ground forces to invade Japan or should they bomb Japan. So on August 1945 the U.S decided to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and this created some controversy. Some people though it was a good idea to bomb Japan, while others say that 200,000 innocent people were killed. I believe that bombing the two cities was the right decision because it did save the lives of many U.S soldiers and it ended World War II.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the end of World War two there have been debates about whether or not the U.S. should have dropped the atomic bomb or not. Many people argue that America had already won the war and that the bombs were uncalled for, but is this true (Doc K)? The U.S. made the right decision in dropping the atomic bomb because it led America to a victory, it ended the war quickly, and it saved more lives then it took.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S was not justifiable for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There are many reasons why the U.S should not have bombed Hiroshima. Many of them were originated from the survivors of the Hiroshima as we learn their horror stories many years later. “13 year old Yoshitaka Kawamoto was 0.8 kilometers away from the hypocenter ( the placed where the atomic bomb was dropped). His whole school building exploded, burying him in debris”.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    July 16th, 1945, a test bomb was successfully detonated at a test bomb site in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Months later, on August 6th, 1945, the first ever atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. On August 9th, 1945, a second atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. In my opinion, the dropping of the atomic bombs “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was not justified. I believe it was not justified because of the effect it had on innocent civilians, the immorality of the operation and theories that the attack may have been racially motivated.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays