Preview

Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong
The Death Penalty is Criminal
A man sits waiting for his execution. He has been found guilty of murder and the government sees it fit that he should be punished in the same way. But wait- doesn’t an eye for an eye leave the whole world blind? What if this man was falsely accused and he is innocent? He could be an upstanding citizen and a positive attribute to society. He might even have a family of his own to care and provide for. Capital punishment exists because some believe it deters crime. If criminals know their punishment will be death, they will not commit murder. Some believe a death for a death is fair. They believe it gives some closure and peace because the murderer is rid of forever. And that though it might be expensive, it
…show more content…
Being Catholic and taught social justice in high school, I learned that it is important to forgive and that it is also wrong to end another person’s life. Theologians believe it is not our right as humans to decide when someone else should die. Catholics get most of their beliefs from the Word of Jesus Christ and He also teaches us to be forgiving and understanding because we are all sinners. Christ leads by example by forgiving his enemies and executors while dying on the cross for their sins: “Father forgive them, for they know not what they do.” He also intervened to prevent capital punishment when he challenged those who would put to death a woman accused of wrongdoing: “Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her” (Christian Theologians Take a Stand Against the Death Penalty). It is said that the death penalty gives closure to the victim 's families. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the loss of a loved one. Judy Kerr, whose brother was murdered, recognized that “the death penalty [would not] bring [her] brother back or help to apprehend his murderer.” She suggested that governments invest in programs that will “actually improve public safety and get more killers off the streets” (Quotes by Families of Homicide Victims). Wouldn’t family and friends feel more at peace if they grew to forgive the person, regardless of the crime? New Hampshire …show more content…
What happens if an innocent person is convicted of murder and is executed for something they did not even do? That person could be the parent of a child or a brother or sister who is a good citizen of society. On August 26, 2008, Michael Blair of Texas became the 130th person released from death row with evidence of innocence since 1973 (Effectiveness of the Death Penalty). Dozens of others have either been released through probable innocence or had their sentences shortened due to possible innocence. Of the more than 1,000 people executed since 1976, how many could have also been innocent? More than a few documented cases exist where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government. Mentally ill patients may also be put to death. Many people are born with brain defects that cause them to act a certain way and it is not fair that someone should be executed just because they were unlucky enough to be born with a mental illness. It still must be proven to the judge and jury that the defendant is mentally ill although it is technically unconstitutional to put a mentally ill patient to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Others are simply against it as they believe that retribution is morally flawed this is a shared view with also numerous Christians. Capital Punishment is wrong as it is just a sanitized form of vengeance, numerous times have there been scenes of howling mobs attacking prison vans containing those accused of murder on their way to and from court suggesting that vengeance remains a major ingredient in the public popularity of capital punishment. Overall the aim of capital punishment is to prevent further crime from occurring however this does not work, the factor that truly deters the likelihood of crime is simply the possible occurrence of being caught and punished. In 1988 a survey was conducted for the UN to determine the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” ( J.R.R. Tolkien). No one knows the exact number of innocent people that were executed. However, since 1973, 156 people Have been exonerated. In the article, Governor Ryan’s Execution Moratorium in Illinois: Killing the Innocent, Governor George Ryan reduced the sentences of inmates facing capital punishment in Illinois. The anti-death penalty citizens praised the governor. Many people are innocent on death row. The innocence projects work extremely hard help those wrongly convicted. The innocence project members are lawyers and good citizens who work to find the truth using DNA testing. Sadly, sometimes…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soc120 Week 3

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A number of people are claimed to have been innocent victims of the death penalty. Newly-available DNA evidence has allowed the exoneration and release of more than 15 death row inmates since 1992 in the United States, but DNA evidence is available in only a fraction of capital cases. Others have been released on the basis of weak cases against them, sometimes involving prosecutorial misconduct; resulting in acquittal at retrial, charges dropped, or innocence-based pardons. The Death Penalty Information Center (U.S.) has published a list of 10 inmates "executed but possibly innocent". At least 39 executions are claimed to have been carried out in the U.S. in the face of evidence of innocence or serious doubt about guilt. Statistics likely understate the actual problem of wrongful convictions because once an execution has occurred there is often insufficient motivation and finance to keep a case open, and it becomes unlikely at that point that the miscarriage of justice will ever be exposed.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dictionary defines the death penalty as punishment for someone convicted of a capital crime. Dating back to centuries ago, any capital crime such as murder, rape, drug trafficking were not tolerated by any means and were immediately sentenced to death. “An eye for an eye” was the typical argument that defended the side that the punishment should equal the crime. In an article written by Louis Pojman, he defends the death penalty with his own “eye for an eye” theory. His reasoning is that he believes humans are logical creatures who make the logical choice to commit a muder, therefore giving up their right to live. Pojman argues that the death penalty is a good deterrent for potential…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No matter what is the crime people commit they are still people. As people die over the world the world cannot pause and grieve forever. Capital punishment is over looked by the general public because they assume that if you are facing capital punishment you are a horrible criminal. But when you look in a humanitarian sense the criminal is just like any other person. No mistake is too horrible that it justifies taking another human…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Innocent people that are found guilty for a crime and are executed as a result will suffer an infinite loss of welfare, leading to a fall in the level of optimal capital punishment (Cameron 1989). Not only this but it adds a cost to society as people will pay more to prove themselves innocent as the real offenders will gain because their expected probability of punishment will decrease; this is know as the innocence externality theory (Cameron 1989). Since the turn of the century it has been found that at least 23 people have been wrongfully executed (Giarratano 1991) with the possibility of more that are unknown, all of which will not be able to receive compensation in exchange for the wrongful doing. These mistakes have happened due to reasons including misleading and suppressed evidence, untrustworthy confessions, perjury, mistaken eyewitnesses, or an incompetent defence counsel (Giarratano 1998). Many of these mistakes could have been corrected with a longer execution delay, but legislation believed that lowering this delay has more of a positive impact on social costs and was therefore decreased in 1996 as stated above (Shepherd 1004). Even though capital punishment can decrease the crime rate, the risk of executing even one innocent person should be a large enough reason to consider implementing other forms of strict…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, the cost of a death penalty court case is tremendous, in comparison to a life sentence case. A Public Defender’s Office in Idaho spent 44 times more time on a death penalty case than a life sentence appeal. Because the time spent on a case directly relates to the cost, giving life sentences instead of the death penalty would be more cost effective for the U.S. government. In addition to this, even people who have done horrible things like murder and treason can contribute to society in a meaningful and positive way. However, society is not able to benefit from these people and may suffer from it. One man, Stanley Tookie Williams, was given a death sentence in 1981 for participation with a brutal gang in which he murdered four people and had two counts of robbery against him. During his time on death row he tried to become a better person. He wrote a series of eight books aimed at children in an attempt to turn them away from gang-violence, an attempt to prevent them from following in his own footsteps. While he filed appeals to get out of his death penalty, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize multiple times. Despite all of this, he was eventually executed in 2005. His efforts at directing kids to a better path in life show us that even the worst criminals can change, that even the worst criminals can have a positive impact on our lives. If he had more time before execution, who knows how many more…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So when we look at the first topic, the risk of executing an innocent. When we think of this we can always question if all the facts in the case have come out, did the courts do their job, was anything illegal done, and the biggest question here is what if were wrong. Great effort has been made in pretrial, trial, appeals, writ and clemency procedures to reduce the chance of an innocent being convicted, sentenced to death or executed. Since 1973, legal protections have established themselves to protect the convicted/accused so that…

    • 1913 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty in Peru

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, death penalty has pros and some are these. It is allowable because the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed. As consequence, death penalty is going to stop criminals from murdering. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his/her life. Many people will agree that death penalty is just and fair. Additionally, the death penalty can lower crime, and is not an evil punishment, it’s the person who committed such a crime who deserves the death penalty.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the death penalty is not effective because you could mistake an innocent person for a criminal. This would mean that the person would die for something he/she he never did and then when they figure out that they got the wrong person they try to compensate their family. This is very wrong because it they are taking the life of an innocent man/woman and paying back their families as if they are animals. I think that this could be the same as a person who kills a farmer’s cow and then pays the farmer for it.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays