Preview

Why Did The War Of The Austrian Succession Breakout?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The War Of The Austrian Succession Breakout?
The office of Prime Minister, which walpole had created, was not understood by the politicians of the time. Indeed, the concept of a “sole” or “overgrown” minister was thoroughly disliked and was indignantly repudiated by those in power. The “outs”, those who were unimportant, came to resent the PM but nevertheless, such position was proving to be essential for the administration of government.
The new administration formed in 1742 consisted of Walpole's followers with the addition of some new Whigs brought in from the opposition. George II wished to make as few changes as possible. He aimed to give the opposition enough office to secure a majority without creating disputes between the parties.
One of the ministers the King retained was the
…show more content…
This lasted for a few days for the King had to stop his hostilities, Pitt had to be brought to the ministry and the King had to place his trust in the Pelhams. With the trust of the Commons and now the trust of the King, Pelham was now the head of the Cabinet and thus England's second Prime Minister.
Why did the War of the Austrian Succession breakout?
The war of the Austrian Succession broke out after the death of Emperor Charles VI of Austria. He had only one heir, Maria Theresa, so before his death he spent years seeking guaranties from other countries that they would accept her as queen peacefully. Frederick of Prussia (long enemy of Austria and main contender for the supremacy over the Germanic countries) used this as an opportunity to seize Silesia and show his military superiority over the other German princes.
The
…show more content…
For this purpose he supported Frederick the Great with generous subsidies. In the past he had denounced commitments and subsidies on the continent, but the situation had now altered. England already was bound by treaty to come to Frederick’s assistance and Frederick might well be overwhelmed, leaving the French at liberty to concentrate on the war with England. Pitt had a firm grasp of the strategic importance of sea power. If the French fleets could be destroyed at sea or blockaded, the link between France and her colonies would be severed. Thus an English blockade became an essential feature of the war. It achieved much more than keeping the French inactive. It reduced the morale and efficiency of the blockaded fleets whereas the blockading squadron remains in a state of preparedness and keenness for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pitt gained support in and outside the commons separately. Pitt’s idea was to delay an immediate election in order for him to tackle his opposition head on. He though that this demonstrate his ability to independent MPs who would then support him in the long-term. ‘Pitt was determined to face his critics in the Commons, and events showed that his judgement was sound. It needed considerable nerve and courage to defy the coalitionists in the Commons. Pitt calculated that if he could impress the House he would set in train a shift of opinion away from the opposition and towards himself. This meant that when the Election took place the morale of the opposition would already be low. He knew that many of North’s followers had been reconciled to the coalition with Fox only because it held out the prospect of a stable ministry. Now that this expectation had been…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Austria and France had been fought in wars for years.France obviously didn’t want a foreigner on the throne,especially not an Austrian to be their queen, which didn’t even know much about its country. But the thing is, before she came to France, the revolution was already smouldering…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French revolution broke out in 1789, and while at first Britain was pleased and welcomed the changes that the revolution brought to France (i.e. the new constitutional monarchy mirrored Britain's political system in many ways.) Pitt and his government began to become worried when the revolution in France stepped up a gear and became more extreme, they obviously didn't want a repeat of the French experience in Britain. The outcome of the revolution was inevitable and in 1792 when France became a republic, it was also the start of a period of time (1793-1794) that became known as 'revolutionary terror'. Revolutionary terror is essentially force used or implemented against people or groups who are counter-revolutionary. This caused a great fear of revolution in Britain and contributed to Britain going to war with France In January 1793 after the execution of Louis XVI. This led to a fear of French invasion of Britain throughout the country and worried Pitt and his government greatly from 1793-1801. This fear was not unfounded as France tried to invade Britain twice, firstly, in 1797 a small group of French soldiers landed in the small welsh village of Fishguard . Even though this small band of troops were easily captured and dealt with, it still began to plant a very real threat of invasion into Britain's soils. In 1798, a larger French military force landed in Ireland and successfully assisted the Irish Rebels, which again showed and proved that the threat of invasion to Britain was now significant and there were now also British worried that France would begin to use Ireland as a 'stepping-stone' to invade Britain. After Pitt declared War on France in 1793, he had hoped to fight a traditional colonial war, but due to the state of the army, he had to focus Britain's army on the naval war and pay others to fight the colonial war for him. He paid for this by introducing income tax.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two despots underwent years of brutal wars with their neighboring countries in order to expand their territories. Half a year after Frederick II became…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    history 1310

    • 4080 Words
    • 12 Pages

    When William Pitt took charge of the war he established a priority—because it was a global conflict—and a strategy (his plan to…

    • 4080 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Was Pitt’s Repressive Policy The Main Reason For His Success In Resisting The Radical Challenge Of 1801?…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * “ difficult to look at Cameron and Obama after bilateral and say they did not look similarly presidential” – McNaughton…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Austro-Hungarian Empire was huge multi-national empire. Some of the mayor nationalities represented, other then the Austrians and Hungarians, were Czechs and Pols. The empire was a dual-Monarchy, because of the Austrians defeat under the Austro-Prussian war. The Austrian empire was weak and in need of a new government. The Hungarians grasped their opportunity to demand more power and a dual-Monarchy, which made Franz Joseph I both the emperor of Austria and the king of Hungary. Some of the other large groups of people (i.e. the Czechs and poles) in the empire felt it unfair that the Hungarians should get power and the right to rule over their part of the empire when they themselves had no influence. Therefor one could say that it is due to great ethnic diversity and dissatisfaction within these ethnic groups that the Austro-Hungarian Empire was weak and unstable.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Pitt the younger became prime minister of Britain in 1783. Britain was in a political crisis having just lost the American war of independence and was also in a huge debt of approximately £242million. Being in the midst of the political and economic turmoil, Pitt introduced several policies to be on top of things and in this essay I am going to assess the success of these policies in meeting Britain’s need between 1783-93.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    for the war. He was of Austria and was believed to be killed by a…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have debated the powers of the king and parliament for centuries, and the events that molded the power balance between the two institutions. This power balance had been changed to a large extent by the end of the seventeenth century from what it had been at the beginning; as power and control slipped out of the monarchy’s grasp and into parliament’s hands. For could James the 1st have ever imagined that in a few years time his son would be beheaded on the charge of treason, and the monarchy itself would be abolished? Could William the 3rd have contemplated having the power to command a standing army, and conducting a foreign policy independent of Parliament? No one can deny the political changes of this era, however, what can be argued is what form this change took; an evolution or a revolution?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7 Years war

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A minister, William Pitt was King George II’s most powerful minister in his working cabinet. William Pitt finally provided Great Britain with what it needed most – a forceful leader (Divine, page 53). He had an arrogant personality that significantly affected Britain with a new imperial policy. William Pitt’s goal was to banish the French from the continent of North America, rather than fight the major battles in Europe because in Europe France would have had the higher advantage. Pitt knew by dismissing the French from North America, Britain would gain more control of the colonial markets and the raw materials. To implement his plan, he took over command of the navy and army and created a plan to cajole Parliament to spend millions of pounds into his war tactics. As a result of his plan, Britain and its colonies would later be affected by serious national debt.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British, Prussia, and Hanover were fighting against the alliance of France, Austria, Saxony, Russia, Sweden, and Spain. The European phase of war lasted from 1757 all the way to 1763. When William Pitt became British Prime Minister her vowed to lead the country to victory. Pitt aimed basically for expelling the French from the North America, buying the cooperation of the colonists by stimulating the North economy with a massive infusion of British currency, and buying the support of the Native American with promises of fixed territorial…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English colonist did not need any protection of the british colonist from the French. The war caused higher taxes that had to be paid to Britain. This is what led them to the American Revolution.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays