Why Countries Gain From International Trade 1 Copy
Why Countries Gain From International Trade
It is perhaps a fundamental part of human nature to desire goods and services, especially if they are scarce. Thus, it is not surprising that trade between groups has been a function of society for millennia. However, in this age of globalization and the international marketplace—as well as opposition to these concepts—it is perhaps worth reiterating why exactly international trade nearly always results in a net benefit to participants. Of course, that is not to say that international trade is uniformly good; indeed, some players are hurt by the trend. However, overall, in most cases, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, on a national level. This is likely because of nations’ various specializations in products. This paper is an exploration of the international trade phenomenon, an attempt to describe (in brief) why international trade is such a beneficial economic activity, an important subject, as it is so central to the global economy. Nor is this an irrelevant topic domestically: In America today, the question of free trade is still a hotly debated one, as well as a multi-faceted one, concerning factors from consumer choice and safety to job stability and politicking. In the course of researching the subject of international trade, it is interesting to note how even relatively simple models are still relevant in the complex web of the worldwide marketplace, and many people see international trade as a solution to some nation’s poverty. This examination will demonstrate how international trade is not a perfect system, but nonetheless is a beneficial one, which has a long history and will likely continue to grow as the world become more interconnected and a growing population consumes more goods and resources.
In summary, international trade is a beneficial economic phenomenon overall. It allows countries to exercise their comparative advantage for certain goods, raising the total level of production and consumption
It is perhaps a fundamental part of human nature to desire goods and services, especially if they are scarce. Thus, it is not surprising that trade between groups has been a function of society for millennia. However, in this age of globalization and the international marketplace—as well as opposition to these concepts—it is perhaps worth reiterating why exactly international trade nearly always results in a net benefit to participants. Of course, that is not to say that international trade is uniformly good; indeed, some players are hurt by the trend. However, overall, in most cases, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, on a national level. This is likely because of nations’ various specializations in products. This paper is an exploration of the international trade phenomenon, an attempt to describe (in brief) why international trade is such a beneficial economic activity, an important subject, as it is so central to the global economy. Nor is this an irrelevant topic domestically: In America today, the question of free trade is still a hotly debated one, as well as a multi-faceted one, concerning factors from consumer choice and safety to job stability and politicking. In the course of researching the subject of international trade, it is interesting to note how even relatively simple models are still relevant in the complex web of the worldwide marketplace, and many people see international trade as a solution to some nation’s poverty. This examination will demonstrate how international trade is not a perfect system, but nonetheless is a beneficial one, which has a long history and will likely continue to grow as the world become more interconnected and a growing population consumes more goods and resources.
In summary, international trade is a beneficial economic phenomenon overall. It allows countries to exercise their comparative advantage for certain goods, raising the total level of production and consumption
References: Deardorff, A. (June 2007). The Ricardian Model. The University Of Michigan. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~alandear/courses/441/handouts/Deardorff-RicardianModel.pdf Leamer, E.E.(1995). The Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice. Princeton University. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.princeton.edu/~ies/IES_Studies/S77.pdf Jing, F. (July 2008). Chinese see dramatic rise in quality of life: economist. China Daily. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2008-08/28/content_6977384.htm Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2005). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Addison Wesley. McDonald, B. (March 2012). International Trade: Commerce Among Nations. International Monetary Fund. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/trade.htm OECD Better Life Index. (2012). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111 Suranovic, S. M. (December 2004). The Specific Factor Model Overview. International Trade Theory and Policy. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch70/T70-20.php Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the Free Trade Area of the Americas. (2011). Global Exchange. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.globalexchange.org/resources/FTAA/oppose World Trade Developments. (2012). World Trade Organization. Web. Retrieved 14 December 2012 from http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2012_e/its12_highlights1_e.pdf