Preview

What Is Wally Broge's Definition Of Murder

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1075 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Wally Broge's Definition Of Murder
CANADA CRIMINAL CODE
Murder and Manslaughter
In order to convict anyone of a criminal offence, there must be a law, which specifically covers the matter at hand.
Here are the relevant sections of the Criminal Code under which, Wally Brogue is charged: Section 212 defines murder:
MURDER.
212. Culpable homicide is murder
a. Where the person who causes the death of a human being
i. Means to cause his death, or ii. Means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not;
b. Where a person, meaning to cause death to a human being or meaning to cause him/her bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and being reckless whether death ensues or not, by accident
…show more content…
Section 214 defines the difference between first and second-degree murder:
213. (1) Murder is first-degree murder and second-degree murder.
(2) Murder is first-degree murder when it is planned and deliberate.
(7) All murder that is not first-degree murder is second-degree murder. Murder becomes manslaughter if the evidence meets the requirements of Section 215 (1):
214. (1) Culpable homicide that otherwise would be murder may be reduced to manslaughter if the person who committed it did so in the heat of passion caused by sudden provocation.
(2) A wrongful act or insult that is of such a nature as to be sufficient to deprive an ordinary person of the power of self – control is provocation for the purposes of this section if the accused acted upon it on the sudden and before there was time for his passion to cool.
The judge will have to instruct the jury on the differences in law between first-degree murder, second-degree murder and manslaughter. The important element of difference is the intent involved. First-degree murder in premeditated that is planned and
…show more content…
Manslaughter is simply the killing of another person by an unlawful act such as an assault. It is not necessary to prove intent to kill another person or intent to inflict an injury likely to cause death in order to establish manslaughter. For manslaughter to be proved it is necessary only to prove that death resulted from an act of the accused person and that this act was unlawful. A shot or blow delivered in self – defence may, of course, be lawful if it is delivered in circumstances which justified the use of such force.
Section 218 and 219 set out the minimum punishments for a conviction of murder or manslaughter: Punishment for Murder – Minimum Punishment
218. (1) every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.
(2) For the purposes of Part XX, the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by this section is a minimum punishment. 1973 – 74, c. 38,
s. 3; 1974 – 75 – 76, c. 105, s. 5.
Punishment for Manslaughter.
219. Every one who commits manslaughter is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for life. 1953 – 54, c. 51, s.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis/Reasoning: The defendant couldn’t justify using self-defense because evidence shows that he was the aggressor in the situation. He is the reason that the situation escalated to the point where it did.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (A) No person, while under the influence of sudden passion or in a sudden fit of rage, either of which is brought on by serious provocation occasioned by the victim that is reasonably sufficient to incite the person into using deadly force, shall knowingly cause the death of another.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case set forth the precedent that juries, not the judge, will have the ability to exercise their discretion when deciding aggravating factors which could lead to the enforcement of the death…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the readings that I have done I have found that there are three different types of legal defenses, they are: self-defense, insanity, and provocation. In a case where a person is charged with first degree premeditated murder, if they were to use one of the three defenses the punishment would not be the maximum that is normally imposed depending on the crime and type of defense that is used.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person can use deadly force against an attacker whom the victim reasonably believes is going to cause them an injury less than death. The attacker is said to be threatening…

    • 430 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Is to have a crime committed against him or her resulting in lost of property, damage to property or person.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excuse Defense Case Study

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of Wafer, who plead not guilty, he felt threatened because his vehicle had been previously vandalized and grabbed his shotgun for protection when McBride approached his residences banging on his doors. However, the jury was put to the test to determine was deadly force necessary. The facts of the case state that the front door of his residence, where the incident occurred had two doors. The main door, which Wafer opened and a locked screen door where he fired the shot through.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of murder in the first degree is: any intentional murder that is willful and premeditated with, by the law of Massachusetts, malice aforethought. This means that one must have the intention to kill, and have thought about killing for enough time for one’s conscious to fully commit to the killing with an evil purpose. So simply by definition, it appears that Matt is a first degree murderer; As we see in the film, his plan was very intricate which shows his forethought, pan out on day where he would have the perfect alibi. He is also the one that pulled the trigger, so surely there was malice in the squeezing of that trigger. All the evidence is there that would put him away for years, or even a lifetime in prison; But now that…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Ramona French 2011. The court has to prove that the defendant has committed the murder, that the killing was premeditated and done intentionally, or that it was done with complete disregard for human life. If the court of law has enough evidence to…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defensive Homicide

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of self defence in relation to homicide case are that a person is not guilty of murder if he or she carries out the conduct that would otherwise constitute murder while believing the conduct to be necessary to defend himself or herself or another person from the infliction of death or really serious injury. In regard to an Alternative verdict of defensive homicide on charge for murder, If on the trial of a person for murder the jury are not satisfied that he or she is guilty of murder but are satisfied that he or she is guilty of an offence against section 9AD (defensive homicide), the jury may acquit the accused of murder and find him or her guilty of defensive homicide and he or she is liable to punishment accordingly.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discharge of a firearm at a motor vehicle that resulted in death or great bodily injury.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A prosecutor's duty is to defer and produce evidence of the crime at hand to the judge and jury so that they can decide an appropriate sentence. According to the case of State v. Stu Dents, there are several charges against the defendant which range from moderate to severe. These charges include homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary, and crimes related to drugs. The prosecution must attempt to provide accurate evidence to prove the charges against Stu Dents. During this trial, the prosecution will evaluate the laws and statutes of Hawaii, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania to determine which state the case is the strongest. The prosecution will examine each of these states thoroughly to provide a better understanding of the charges, which will provide a guideline in determining the best sentencing alternatives.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnny Cade Murder Essay

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, the definition of first degree murder involves premeditation, deliberate planning, and malice. However, there is no evidence supporting that Johnny Cade made use of any of the previously mentioned elements of murder before killing Bob Sheldon. Johnny acted strictly…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three common elements in all crimes: mens rea (“guilty mind”), actus reus (“wrongful deed”) and causation. Many jurists also include concurrence (both the mens rea and actus reus must be connected). Mens rea or intent means that the criminal act must be voluntary or purposeful. It varies depending on the offense. For murder, the most heinous homicide, the mental element requires the defendant acted with “malice aforethought”. The malice aforethought distinguishes murder from manslaughter. The four states of mind that are said to make up malice aforethought are: the intent to kill, the intent to inflict great bodily injury, the intent to commit a felony or awareness of high risk of death or serious bodily injury. On the other hand, manslaughter is a legal term for the killing of a human being, in manner considered by law as less culpable than murder. The person accused for manslaughter didn’t have the intent to do a homicide, so guilty mind isn’t required. Actus reus (wrongful deed) is the second element of crimes. It refers to the criminal act or an unlawful omission of an act that must have occurred. So, if someone just thinks about killing someone else, they cannot be punished. The murder must be proven. In respect of manslaughter, actus reus is essential element too. There is no crime; there is no homicide without this element. Concurrence means that mens rea and actus reus occur at the same time. The murder is perfect example for…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Malaysian Tort Trespass

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the case of R v St George, it is held that pointing an unloaded gun without the plaintiff knowing it, is constituted as assault. It is because it is reasonable to feel…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays