Preview

What is the Rome Statute?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What is the Rome Statute?
n 17 July 1998, a conference of 160 States established the first treaty-based permanent international criminal court. The treaty adopted during that conference is known as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Among other things, it sets out the crimes falling within the jurisdiction of the ICC, the rules of procedure and the mechanisms for States to cooperate with the ICC. The countries which have accepted these rules are known as States Parties and are represented in the Assembly of States Parties.

The Assembly of States Parties, which meets at least once a year, sets the general policies for the administration of the Court and reviews its activities. During those meetings, the States Parties review the activities of the working groups established by the States and any other issues relevant to the ICC, discuss new projects and adopt the ICC’s annual budget.
The Rome Statute established four core international crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression. However throughout the negotiations, other crimes were considered for inclusion, including ecocide.[8] Following years of negotiation, aimed at establishing a permanent international tribunal to prosecute individuals accused of genocide and other serious international crimes, such as crimes against humanity, war crimes and the recently defined crimes of aggression, the United Nations General Assembly convened a five-week diplomatic conference in Rome in June 1998 "to finalize and adopt a convention on the establishment of an international criminal court".[9][10] On 17 July 1998, the Rome Statute was adopted by a vote of 120 to 7, with 21 countries abstaining.[11] Because the way each delegation voted was officially unrecorded, there is some dispute over the identity of the seven countries that voted against the treaty.[12] It is certain that the People's Republic of China, Israel, and the United States were three of the seven because they have publicly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the main judicial organ of the United Nations. It replaced by the Permanent Court of International Justice after World War II, when it was made part of the UN Charter drafted in San Francisco in 1945, International Court of Justice .…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States government was somewhat based on the beliefs of the Romans although very different. Like the majority of other countries, The U.S. has three main bodies which include the judicial branch, the legislative branch and the executive branch. The governments of Rome and the United States of America differ in many different ways and have changed and will continue to change throughout the years.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court has since stated that the ATS provides “a cause of action for [a] modest number of international law violations.” To discern if a modern offense also violates the law of nations, which is also known as customary international law, courts will examine whether the offense “rest[s] on a norm of international character accepted by the civilized world and defined with specificity comparable to the features of the 18th century paradigms.” Further, a customary norm should be “specific, universal, and…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Representatives from the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, France, and 19 other countries signed an agreement allowing the International Military Tribunal to conduct the trials (www.britannica.com). The International Military Tribunal contained a member and backup up selected by all 4 signatory countries (www.britannica.com). They were given permission to find any individual person guilty of creation and action of war crimes. They also had the authority to state any…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike other international bodies, these courts hold jurisdiction within each UN nation. Prosper, who served as lead counsel in the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, recounted how the case used a dormant convention from 1948. According to BBC, “it became the first international court to pass a judgment on genocide.” However, despite acknowledging the power of UN tribunals, Prosper questioned their capacity to effectively prevent war crimes. Often, it takes years to gather evidence, and the court cannot convict every individual involved.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ICC is an inappropriate vehicle to promote the international law of the envelope or the definition of the early offense itself is politically controversial (such as the use of nuclear weapons or the crime of aggression). Elements give meaning to the principle of legality, Nullum crimen sine lege ("no crime without law"), and the requirements of any guidance should be how to prove the sponsor and the defense lawyer than it should be defended against. It is so important to United State are concerns that ICC judges – in the absence of elements - can apply them differently, and are not always associated with the experience of shaping the unforeseen patterns of the law. Such judicial activism is improper for anybody indirectly accountable to the people, it is particularly applicable to criminal courts. The United States government has been seeking bilateral non-surrender agreements (BIAs), or so-called “Article 98” agreements and other known as “American Service Members’ Protection Act” as the shield United States citizens which only the ICC’s jurisdiction. Moreover, the agreements constitute a breach of international law if signed state parties of ICC and many ICC advocates condemn the U.S. BIAs as an inexcusable attempt to gain immunity from the crimes under the Rome…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In Rwanda

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Wikipedia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was established by United Nation in 1994 after the Rwandan Genocide.The ICTR was set up to bring those responsible for the genocide to justice.The Rwandan genocide violated the international human right law by murdering , raping , kidnaping ,military of children, exterminating the Tutsi population.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Table of Roman Law

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As advanced civilizations developed throughout the world, a common trend was observed regardless of time and location. That trend was the development of a law and government. Each civilization developed some form of law, the Babylonians had Hammurabi’s Code, the Hebrew had Mosaic Law, and the Greeks had the Draconian Law. Although these were all great forms of law, one of the most important advances in legal history was the Romans and their development of the 12 Tables of Roman Law. The 12 tables of Roman law reflect the social structure, government, and moral values of the Roman Empire.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the meetings inTehran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945), the three major wartime powers, the United Kingdom, United States, and the Soviet Union, agreed on the format of punishment for those responsible for war crimes during World War II. France was also awarded a place on the tribunal. The legal basis for the trial was established by the London Charter, which was agreed upon by the four so-called Great Powers on 8 August 1945, [15] and which restricted the trial to "punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    people involved and the first and second parts of the trials. The international military tribunal and…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peace Enforcement

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The U.N.’s charter set out four primary goals: “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind . . . ; to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights . . . ; to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained; and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.” In order to promote these goals, the organizers established six different bodies. The Security Council, which consists of five permanent members (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China) and ten rotating member countries, was given primary responsibility for international peace and security. The General Assembly, to which all members belong, decides budgetary matters and votes on policy issues. The other bodies are the Secretariat, the Economic and Social Council, the Court of Justice, and…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The shift to Christianity within the empire helped provide the emperor with more authority and therefore with more security. This is due to the fact that the Roman Empire began to be seen as an earthly incarnation of heaven, where the emperor acted as God’s regent (Maas, 1). The head of the state had become a leading figure in the Church as well. This would have justified any actions taken or laws made by the emperor and his government since they were ultimately made at God’s command. The importance of Roman Law, and its connection to Christian Law, heavily influenced the abilities of the emperor as well.…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Receiving Children

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Mary Roach’s book, Stiff, The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, she describes how upstanding anatomists would pay “body snatchers” to dig up graves and retrieve bodies for “dissection” (44-45). The anatomists never saw anything wrong with digging up the bodies, dissecting, and desecrating beyond recognition, then throwing the bodies literally to the vultures. This disrespect of bodies still occurs today on a different scale, all over the world. Some countries in the world today are not as fortunate or as developed as the United States is, which makes raising a family more difficult than Americans can imagine. Families sometimes have to give up their children for…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Law

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Module 4 1. In Roman law - particularly in The Body of the Civil Law – what does "natural law" refer to? According to Roman law, specifically The Body of the Civil Law, natural law refers to laws that apply to both animals and humans. 2.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions regulating multimodal transport which has been widely used in practise with the globalization of national economies and development of commercial system. Since the Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules are unable to cope with multimodal carriage, unimodal conventions will apply to the specific stages of the whole carriage which includes at least two different ways of transportation across borders. Each leg of multimodal transport may attract a different liability regime, making the issue of liability quite difficult.1. It will be quite difficult to define the regulating conventions at the very beginning for each convention has succeed only in introducing another competing international code, with the consequence that the world is currently burdened with three international codes each of which has succeed in attracting different degrees of state support.2 Apart from that, the range between different stages is not clear enough, especially when the loss occurred between two different stages. For example, the loss happened at the port during the time that the goods were unloaded from trucks and then loaded to a vessel, but it was found impossible to localise the loss specifically. Besides, the Hague-Visby Rules and Hague Rules are considered not to be able sufficiently to deal with electronic trade and containerisation, and the limitations of liability are also to be pro-carrier, while the Hamburg Rules are lack of universal application.3 In short, the…

    • 5835 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays