Booker T. Washington could be considered a complete opposition, tactic wise, to W.E.B. Du Bois. Washington preached a message of accommodation and self-help. He encouraged the black population to join schools and educate themselves in order to improve themselves (A). He received high criticism for his ideals of accommodation, many other black reformers thought about him as an Uncle Tom for not wanting to change the conditions of the blacks sooner. But Washington believed in a patient game of chess, let the others play their pieces and when the time comes the whites will see how truly valuable and capable blacks are. Later the NAACP, largely due to Du Bois, will bash on his ideas and methods for change. This is after his Atlanta Address of 1895 where he again advocated for accommodation (D). Washington advocated a "go slow" approach to avoid a harsh white backlash. The effect was that many youths in the South had to accept sacrifices of potential political power, civil rights and higher education. His belief was that African Americans should focus on their education and economy of their southern home. Washington valued the "industrial" education, as it provided critical skills for the jobs then available to the majority of African Americans at the time, as most lived in the South, which was overwhelmingly rural and agricultural. He thought these skills would lay the foundation for the creation of stability that the African-American community required in order to move forward. The address mentioned many of the things blacks had accomplished for the nation, calling for whites to look at this Negro population: educated, organized, patient, faithful, law-abiding, unresentful people. 25 year-old Washington sought to improve the…
5. How did DuBois's beliefs about achieving equality, as reflected in this quotation, differ from those of Booker T. Washington? (number 8)…
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois, both early advocates of the civil rights movement, offered solutions to the discrimination experienced by black men and women in the nineteenth and twentieth century. Despite having that in common, the two men had polar approaches to that goal. Washington, a man condoning economic efficiency had a more gradual approach as opposed to Du Bois, whose course involved immediate and total equality both politically and economically. For the time period, Washington overall offers a more effective and appropriate proposition for the time whereas Du Bois's approach is precedent to movements in the future. Both have equal influence over African Americans in politics. Washington's proposal excels in reference to education while Du Bois can be noted for achieving true respect from white Americans.…
In post-reconstruction America, many Black writers, ministers, teachers and others eloquently argued on behalf of freedom and justice for Black Americans, advocating various strategies for achieving racial and economic equality. Two such leaders who helped shape the political discourse were Ida B. Wells and Booker T. Washington. Urging politically divergent approaches, they both wanted African American people and men in particular, to be valued and respected by the white south. However, they differed significantly in the means by which they believed such change would come about. Ida B. Wells told the truth in a way that made many whites uncomfortable, addressing lynching and other racially motivated atrocities directly and proposing that African Americans collectively leverage economic power through strikes and boycotts, and individually protect themselves from lynches with weapons. In contrast, Washington was more conciliatory, appealing to whites to give African Americans the opportunity to prove their technical capacity and participate alongside whites as legitimate economic partners. While the “gradualist” gained unprecedented access to formal political power through his white benefactors, I believe Ida B. Wells’ argument that African Americans stop conceding power to whites was more persuasive in advancing racial equality for African Americans in post-reconstruction America.…
The time period of 1877 to 1915 was a period in history when the people of the Black race were being granted a free status, but equality, on the other hand, was not an option to some higher white officials. During this time period, many leaders started to fight for what they believed in by appealing to the white governing body for social equality. Two of the leaders that came out of that uproar were the well-known Black equality activists of that time, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois. Both of these leaders ultimately had the same goal, however, the paths that they took to achieve that goal were significantly different. Booker T. Washington had a “gradualism” stance to deal with the problems of poverty and discrimination facing Black Americans, while W.E.B. Du Bois wants Black equality immediately and does not offer any alternatives. In retrospect, Booker T. Washington’s strategy was more appropriate for the time period than that of W.E.B. Du Bois because Washington’s proposal included the whole race of Blacks along with compromises with the white population while Du Bois’s proposal only included the top ten percent of the Black race, making his philosophy inappropriate for this time period.…
In the days when segregation was not uncommon, there were two men that played a huge part in the fight for equality in the United States. Booker T. Washington and WEB DuBois were great leaders, who supporterted civil rights, yet also disagreed on various issues related to reconstruction, poverty, racism, and discrimination. Both Washington and DuBois worked on reforming education as well as eliminating discrimination towards Blacks, but their strategies of achieving said change varied greatly.…
For decades, Booker T. Washington (1856-1915) was the major African-American spokesman in the eyes of white America. Born a slave in Virginia, Washington was educated at Hampton Institute, Norfolk, Virginia. He began to work at the Tuskegee Institute in 1881 and built it into a center of learning and industrial and agricultural training. A handsome man and a forceful speaker, Washington was skilled at politics. Powerful and influential in both the black and white communities, Washington was a confidential advisor to presidents. For years, presidential political appointments of African-Americans were cleared through him. He was funded by Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, dined at the White House with Theodore Roosevelt and family, and was the guest of the Queen of England at Windsor Castle. Although Washington was an accommodator, he spoke out against lynchings and worked to make "separate" facilities more "equal." Although he advised African-Americans to abide by segregation codes, he often traveled in private railroad cars and stayed in good hotels.…
Booker T. Washington uses the metaphor of the fingers and the hand to alleviate the pressures felt by both whites and blacks. Whites did not want to feel forced into interaction while a lot of blacks would have probably felt resentment towards having to interact with whites. In the passage preceding this declaration, he states, "we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one." He directly communicates and uses the word civil in an effort to show that he is for equality in facets of society where it is most prevalent. Social appears to mean all aspects in which interaction among African Americans is recreational, like going to a play or movie or eating at a restaurant. Furthermore, I think Washington gives leeway in case things do change in that if it so happens that what is social becomes of civil interest, that too, would become apart of the hand of mutual progress.…
Cited: Gibson, Robert A. Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois: The Problem of Negro…
In 1895 there was discrimination everywhere. In America people of African descent had a miserable existence. Less than 40 years earlier, they were either “owned” property, known as slaves, or lived a very humble, poverty stricken life. Booker T. Washington was among a number of very few blacks that were articulate, well educated, and well informed. He was aware that his life stood as an example to both blacks and whites that his race was capable of much more. His purpose was to bring the United States together and show how everyone could benefit. In this speech, Booker T. Washington uses many rhetorical devices to promote changes in the combined community of the nation. In his opening statements he was clear that the audience as a participating element in society should recognize the “American Negro”.…
Booker T Washington and W.E.B Dubois were both born into slavery. They had many of the same life experiences. Despite them having experienced similar things growing up they had different views for the post-slavery Negro. Different views on how the Negros and Whites should co-exist.…
During the time of racial segregation in The United States, thousands of leaders rose from their seats to fight for equal rights for Africa Americans. Two main leaders were Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois. Although both leaders had the same goal, their views of achieving them were completely different. Washington believed in gradually working their way up the ladder; year after year African Americans will be treated with more and more respect and equality they deserve. On the other hand, Du Bois was aggressive in his tactic by instantaneously demanding his equal rights. He believed Whites will never give African American equal rights unless compelled to do so. This was a battle between peace and war, light and dark, but as history has proven, peace always wins.…
Dubois himself had his own problems with what Booker T. Washington was trying to say in his address. Dubois didn’t like the fact that Washington was trying to promote a policy of submission for asking them to give up fundamental privileges. Du Bois explains to the people that this policy has effected African Americans in negative ways by contributing to the loss of the vote, the loss of the whole idea of being a citizen, and the loss of aid towards education system. I for one am with Dubois on this one because if this was me during this time, I would not want to have that feeling of demoralization in stooping to the level where you would actually be a lesser person to the whites. I would feel like I had to give up something in order to make peace and to me that is inhumane.…
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois are leaders of the black community in late 19th century and 20th century. But they hold opposite opinions on how to get political equality. Washington urged caution and restraint. In 1895, Washington stated that blacks should accept the segregation to exchange the education and job from the whites in Atlanta Compromise Address. Blacks could integrate into society when they have knowledge and economy security. However, DuBois formed an “anti-Bookerite” movement, and insisted that blacks should fight for immediate equality. They represented two different thoughts in black social and economy progress.…
Back in the days when racism was a huge problem there were two main leaders that stepped into play to help control the issues. Even though they were completely opposite both of them made huge changes in the segregation of the United States of America, their names will never be forgotten, Booker T. Washington and WEB Dubois. The first leader that came along was Booker T. Washington. Booker T. Washington wanted the good to show in all of black people. He believed that the blacks should work for themselves. Booker T. Washington believed that they would not make it any where in society if they focused on just equality.. He wanted job education for blacks so they could learn how to do their jobs and do it properly. Booker T. Washington was known as being a great public speaker, but not only did Booker T. Washington focus on speaking to blacks he also spoke to whites as well. When talking to the whites he focused on how blacks are stereotyped. When he spoke to the blacks though he talked to them about how they should not hide in the whites shadows, they should break out of the box and be who they want to be. Booker T. Washington all in all though focused on all blacks getting economic equality. The next main leader was WEB Dubois, he focused on the exact opposite things that of Booker T. Washington. Dubois focused on a strategy called the gradualist political strategy. The gradualist political strategy tells that Dubois was very focused on blacks being book…