Preview

Waverly Holland Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Waverly Holland Case
Waverly Holland Case Key agents: Waverly Holland, who used to work as a senior auditor in a public accounting firm. Robert Chop, an attorney in a law firm which is in charge of the audit case of Padova&Vicenza. Clayton Morris, the partner who was involved in the case of Padova&Vicenza. T.J. Gillette, the in-house attorney for the public accounting firm.
Overview: Waverly Holland has been working in a public accounting firm for three years. He was responsible for an auditing case for Padova&Vicenza. After he resigned from the accounting firm to take his MBA program, he received a call from Robert Chop, an attorney who is in charge of the investigation of the auditing case of Padova&Vicenza. Chop wants Waverly to cooperate with him about the case. Chop convinced him by promising him that they wouldn't let him be defendant. Waverly tried to get some idea from Morris, the former partner of the accounting firm. Morris suggested and threatened him not to meet with Chop. Instead, he suggested him to get help from Gillette, the in-house attorney. Waverly didn't know what to do.
Issue: I think Waverly should not meet with Chop. First, he is not the person who should be responsible for the case. Only the chief executive officer, the chief operating officer, and the chief financial officer are the principal defendants. Second, Morris threatened Waverly that if he meets with Chop, Waverly won’t finish his graduated degree. But dealing with his own skiing resort is always his dream. It is the most important reason that why he left the accounting firm. Third, I believe Gillette will deal with the lawsuit in an appropriate way. Waverly doesn't have to worry about this.

American International Group Case
Key agents: American International Group, a multinational insurance corporation.
PNC, which wants to use AGI’S SPE service.
Ernst&Young, PNC’s audit firm.
Michael Joseph, a partner of Ernst&Young
Overview: AIG started a new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wati Holmwood Case

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While holding back tears in court, Wati Holmwood said he was sorry for running onto the playing field and that will now land him in jail. Holmwood will spend 2 months in jail after a 70-meter sprint at a 2016 Olympic football game in Rio before over 83,000 fans and was witnessed by millions of people on television worldwide.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hallstead Case

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Average sales would have to increase over $24 to break even if fixed costs remained the same.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kingsford Case

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Climate * P&G tried to acquire Clorox in 1957. Gov. objected to prevent a Monopoly. * 1980’s charcoal category was growing * # of barbeque events: * 1987: 1.4 B * 1995: 2.7 B * 2000: 3 B *…

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: In 1995 William Brotby was hired by Computer Task Group, Inc. (CTG) as an information technologies consultant. Upon hiring, Brotby had to sign an agreement stating that he would be restricted to work for any CTG customers if he left the company. No more than two years later, Brotby left CTG and began to work for one of CTG’s customers known as Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. CTG, plaintiff, filed a suit against Brotby, defendant, in a federal district court alleging breach of contract. During the production of discovery, Brotby refused to fully respond to CTG’s interrogatories, never gave truthful answers, filed unwarranted motions, made flimsy objections, and never disclosed all of the information that CTG sought. Brotby was fined twice by the court and was issued five separate orders ordering him to cooperate. Because of Brothby’s continuous refusal to cooperate, CTG eventually filed a motion to enter default judgment against him in 1999. The court granted the motion; however, Brotby appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Thornton, R, ‘Dishonest Assistance: Guilty Conscience or Guilty Mind?’ [2002] 61 Cambridge Law Journal 3…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mr Zhang

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages

    The Lakeside Company: Auditing Cases, 11th edition, has been updated in light of the accounting scandals of the early 2000s and the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the renewed interest in ethics within the accounting and auditing profession.…

    • 42353 Words
    • 170 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locker Room Talk

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Locker Room Talk Ethical Case outlines a situation that is an ethical dilemma for CPA Albert Gable who has performed personal financial planning for Larry and Susan Wilson. The Wilson’s, in their discussions with Mr. Gable regarding their personal finances, mentioned that in the past they have had marriage problems but have worked through the problems and are not seeking a divorce. Gable and the Wilson’s became personal friends due to the relationship built during their personal financial planning. Mr. Gable also performs the annual audit for one of the largest banks in the town where they all live. The sample pulled for the audit at the bank included the Wilson’s loan information. While performing the audit, Mr. Gable discovers information on the Wilson’s loan that does not coincide with the information given to him during the personal financial planning. Mr. Gable is concerned and addresses the discrepancy with a loan officer but did not confide to the loan officer that he was also their personal financial planner. The loan officer confided in Mr. Gable that Mr. Wilson was setting up his business to divorce his wife without any compensation.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    -The court interpreted the plain view rule, for the offer it is a risk but after…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Duke Lacrosse Scandal

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Middleton, M. (1982). Should judges blow the whistle on lawyers? American Bar Association Journal, 68(10), 1207.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    wanted to pursue a partnership position with her new employer. But, she believed that the training programs the firm provided and the breadth of experience…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law I Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The defendants, upon being hired by Russell, entered into contracts which contained three relevant covenants in this case; not to compete with the plaintiffs, not to solicit the plaintiff’ customers, and not to disclose the plaintiffs’ confidential information. The defendants, for many alleged reasons, separated themselves from the plaintiff and began working for a competitor, Red Bull New York, between August and November 2007. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants were contradiction the covenants mentioned above because of his immediate drop in customers since the defendants left. The defendants claim that all of the information can be readily found on the internet and that they had not disclosed any confidential information. If the defendants were to be found guilty then the consequences would be an oppressive and unfair scenario. Therefore, the motion for preliminary injunction was denied in favor of the defendants.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the first day when Jane says, she has a side business on the side, and she didn’t pay taxes because the government does not know about it, Carl failed and avoided the ABA MR Rule 2.1; NFPA Rule EC-1.3(a) which is stated that, lawyer must be an independent lawyer and advice candidate according to justice but on that particular time Carl does not provide any instruction to Jane smith about the violation of ABA and NFPA rules. Furthermore, according to ABA MR 5.5(b); NFPA EC 1.7 (a) Carl also failed to identify himself as a paralegal…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AMRE

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages

    -100 . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . 100…

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Agoos Bagoos, a consultant from a Big Four accounting firm findings as per following;…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays