Preview

War Is Inevitable, Therefore We Should Work to Be Good at It.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Is Inevitable, Therefore We Should Work to Be Good at It.
War is taken to mean a conflict often carried on by force of arms between nations or parties within a nation. It is carried on by force of arms in a series of battles or campaigns. There have been a great many wars throughout history. Since the earliest recorded history, human beings have been effective and organized at making war. The technology of war has also improved, to the point that today, weapons exist that cannot be used without risking the complete destruction of both sides. This was the basis of the cold war during the second half of the twentieth century. War is costly, both in human and material terms. History might show that war is inevitable and there seem to be a number of possible causes. Increasing population, Religion, differing ideologies and competition for resources, all appear to play a part in the cause of war. Desire for greater freedom and human rights has, in more recent years, been a driving force in civil wars. Finally, there is the fundamental question – do human beings naturally tend to make war? This essay will attempt to examine war and its causes in order to come to a conclusion as to whether it is inevitable. Today, with the United Nations trying to settle disputes peacefully and actively trying to protect human rights, war is not inevitable. However, if war is inevitable, a nation should work to be good at it. As the cold war has shown, to be very good at war may actually work to avoid major conflict and its associated costs. Being good at war means being strong enough so that nations can defend their territory and making it less likely they will be threatened. In the 21st century, being good at war means possessing the latest technology for conducting war.

Keegan (1993, p. 1) states that warfare is almost as old as man himself. Since the earliest recorded history, there have been wars. Conflict has always been a part of humanity. The reasons for every war will be different but overall, in ancient times, as farming practices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War never ends quietly; while the battlefield tells the most immediate brutal stories, it is the aftermath that shows the greatest tragedy. The Vietnam War is not an exception; it resulted in countless damages, the worst being the psychological trauma suffered by its participants. This therefore becomes a recurring subject explored by many Vietnam War authors, who wrote of an experience they lived first hand. The depiction of psychological trauma in their works heightens the brutality of the war and criticises its tragic futility.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arquila's Summary

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Arquila’s article for the foreign policy, one of the simplest approaches to recognize the patterns of War’s domination over time is observing statistics that portray the patterns of armed conflict all over the world. Statistics show a clear oscillation in the occurrence of armed conflict over the years, with an evident increase prior to the main world wars and decreases post-wars. Despite the evidence, the numbers of armed conflicts are at a steady increase and are almost double what they were recorded to be in the late 1950s.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this day and age, many may acknowledge the very controversial issue of technology for peace. This subject is so debated because nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the world as we know it. However, they are essential if we are to protect ourselves. We need to have them, because almost anybody can gain control of them and become a threat. Mutually Assured Destruction insures that both sides need to have weapons of mass destruction to prevent a nuclear war. The use of human soldiers to make peace is too great a risk, and not worth it. With such treacherous weapons as these, it is crucial that we make all the right decisions, but we must also give the world some credit and acknowledge the fact that people have learnt from their mistakes, like what happened in Japan, and nobody wants that to happen again. It is imperative that we have these arms because the technology is already out there and almost anyone can obtain them, Mutually Assured Destruction insures that as long as both sides have them then nobody will strike, and the risk of human casualties is too great and not worth it.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warfare Reformatted

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    IS WAR A BIOLOGICAL necessity, a sociological inevitability, or just a bad invention? Those who argue for the first view endow man with such pugnacious instincts that some outlet in aggressive behaviour is necessary if man is to reach full human stature. It was this point of view which lay behind William James's famous essay, 'The Moral Equivalent of War', in which he tried to retain the warlike virtues and channel them in new directions. A similar point of view has lain behind the Soviet Union's attempt to make competition between groups rather than between individuals. A basic, competitive, aggressive, warring human nature is assumed, and those who wish to outlaw war or outlaw competitiveness merely try to find new and less socially destructive ways in which these biologically given aspects of man's nature can find expression. Then there are those who take the second view: warfare is the inevitable concomitant of the development of the state, the struggle for land and natural resources, of class societies springing not from the nature of man, but, from the nature of history. War is nevertheless inevitable unless we change our social system and outlaw classes, the struggle for power, and possessions; and in the event of our success warfare would disappear, as a symptom vanishes when the disease is cured.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lysistrata And War Essay

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay explains how war is always being upgraded to new forms of conflict. Mead talks about a civilization that does not have full out wars but '"'quarrels'"'. Had this civilization been exposed to guns and weapons, these '"'quarrels'"' would have turned into deadly bloody conflict exceedingly fast. Progression is shown in all types of conflict until eventually we got to exclusively using atomic bombs as threats. '"'people who do not know of duels, will not fight duels'"' (Mead 21). Before duels were invented, obviously there were no duels. This proves Mead"'"s point…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 5th century, the philosopher Plato insightfully noted, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war,” with history showing this to be true. People have continued to engage in all manner of conflicts, be they petty arguments or large-scale confrontations from which valuable lessons have been learnt about human nature and the present. History has revealed the flaws and primitive nature of people irrespective of the mistaken belief that progress has led to civilisation and order. Past conflicts teach that individuals, communities and even nations do not learn from past mistakes but continue to repeat them and that despite eventually being resolved, the effects have the ability to linger and haunt subsequent generations. History also teaches that conflict invariably occurs when people or nations act for self-interest and personal gain, or and when uncompromising authorities exploit their absolute power over citizens to ensure their authority remains unquestioned. Also by understanding the causes of past conflicts, individuals may reflect on their own behaviours and hopefully prevent them from occurring in the present, or if they do, provide a guide as to how to best minimise the damage they cause by knowing how to resolve them quickly and equitably before they spread beyond the main combatants which they invariably do.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the beginning of time conflict has always existed. When conflict is confronted, majority of the time it is answered with violence. The definition of violence from The Oxford Dictionary is "the use of force to cause injury, damage, or death." Violence can come in all forms and may or may not be intended. World history teaches that violence influences wars the most. A simple act of violence can have a big impact on people and how they react to it. Almost always when a violent act is committed it is answered with even more violence. From person to person the reason for violence will be different. Commonly it is because of revenge or anger. However that might not be true for everyone or every war. In "A People 's History of the United…

    • 4023 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why War?

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is war inevitable? It appears that the answer to this question is yes. However, war is unpredictable and must be studied based on individual circumstances, actions taken, and reactions. States disagree with each other on many subjects and conflicts arise often. To answer this question, we must first examine the causes of a conflict, evaluate the outcome and determine any alternatives that may exist. Then we can analyze some alternative theoretical outcomes compared to the actual conclusions. The Peloponnesian War provides an excellent example to be evaluated. The following gives a brief history of the war, causes of the war, and the importance of its study.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ehrenreich’s logical reasoning is based on war throughout recorded history. She states that one can “find a predilection for warfare among hunter-gatherers, hunting and farming peoples, industrial and even post industrial societies, democracies, and dictatorships.” This appeal to logic forms the assertion that war does not plague a single type or feature of society nor does it discriminate against certain peoples. When offering stats in support of her argument about the cost of war in the current time, Ehrenreich is viewed as knowledgeable and informed in her argument. By presenting a strong, clear claim and providing evidential support, Ehrenreich’s main claim appears more convincing to her audience.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War and Peace

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The United States should use military force in defense of personal liberties and rights, for stability and security, in self defense, and as a last resort, when peaceful resolution and/or compromise is impossible. The goal of U.S. foreign policy should be to that which benefits itself and its citizens. Peace is possible, but not always sustainable. The topic of War and Peace has been the central, continually recurring issue throughout a majority of United States history, continually affecting everyday modern life within the international community. War is an unpleasant, yet necessary instance that will likely continue to pervade human interaction. Peace, being the opposite of war, is seen as preferable, but lacks the problem solving abilities of war. Because of this intricate relationship, the two will always be in tango, each affecting each other in every way. Foreign policy, the interaction with others, will constantly dictate the states of war and peace, and when their existence is permitted. The essay will attempt to explain war in terms of conflicting self interest, compromise, and violence. The essay will attempt to form a definite stance concerning foreign policy, and answer how we should interact with other people/countries, and why. Foreign policy stance will form the baseline for clauses of when going to war is acceptable. And war will be analyzed in depth to explain why it occurs, what happens in it, and what it ends in. These ideas will be supported by examples from American History, including the American Revolution, the Civil War, the French and Indian War, and French Revolution, through recognizing patterns throughout history, in-depth analysis, and factual evidence.…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inevitability of War

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people believe in a deep-root theory, that this predisposition to violence is a component of evolution. E. O. Wilson is considered the “father of Sociobiology” and is a respected scientist in his field. In his article “Is War Inevitable”, he mentions an old parable. A scorpion wants to ride on the back of a frog across a stream. The frog hesitates at first but then realizes that if the scorpion stings him while they’re in the water they will both perish. So the frog agrees and halfway across the water the scorpion stings him. As they both drown the frog asks why he did that. The scorpion replied “because it’s in my nature.” Further in this article Wilson argues that war is “human’s hereditary curse”, and explains that, with the necessity of survival, our prehistoric ancestors have handed down over generations the “engrained” social behavior of competition and contention towards each other. These instincts, he says, started as small tribes of homo-sapiens fought over territories of land during the hunting and gathering era. Food was scarce so territorial conflict was an imminent product of this situation. Even with the…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics