Preview

war guilt cause

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
991 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
war guilt cause
The alleged misunderstandings were that the War Guilt Clause was to prevent Germany from any counter-arguments and asking for reimbursement. However, it was later associated with Germany and its "war guilt". This illustrates that "In politics, perception is reality" because despite the true purpose of the War Guilt Clause, the perceptions of the Allied nations of Germany's role in World War I became reality for them. Not only did it become reality, it completely altered their perception and believed that all the blame was on Germany. 2. The German viewpoint on the War Guilt Clause was that it was highly unfair, and denied that "Germany and its people... were alone guilty". The Allies viewpoint was that it was to state the crimes of "Kaiser Wilhelm" and for Germany to take responsibility of all losses suffered by the Allies as a result of the war. I agree with the German point of view more, because I don't believe World War I was solely caused by one country. Although I agree that Germany was partially responsible, they should not have to take responsibility for "all loses" of the war. 3. I believe that the Allies were in a tussle with the rest of the world. Destructive for Humanity. War is, without argument the worst collective experience of humanity. It has created new nations on the rubbles of destroyed cities and humans dead.

It involves mass killing without humane feelings even if short and swift. Our recent experience with Kargil, which was not even not even a full-fledged war, reopened the sordidness of military action.

Wars, when prolonged like the World Wars, result in human brutality, mass extermination of races and intolerable atrocities on innocent civilians. All rules are kept on the backburner and what matters is victory or defeat. The 21st Century has seen the development of weapons, controlled by computerized systems, with pin-point accuracy and a million-fold increase in powers of destruction compared to our previous wars.

Weapons and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War Guilt Clause is a section in the Treaty of Versailles saying that “Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage….” (Document D). Germany was humiliated, not only had they lost the war after lying to the German citizens by saying they were winning, they were now being punished harshly. The Treaty of Versailles rubbed the Germany’s loss in and only infuriated Germany more and more. The Germans saw the Treaty of Versailles as an “atrocious injustice” and wanted it destroyed (Document…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Causes of Wwii

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Documents1, 3, and 4 support the idea that one of the causes that led to World War II included Germany’s attempt of imperialism. Document 1, an excerpt from Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, explains some of Hitler’s ideas of forming a regime first in order to gain lands that had been taken away after German defeat in World War I. Document 1 is biased since it has been written by Hitler’s point of view who only wants to brainwash the German masses into supporting his ideas of “enhancing” Germany’s position as a global power by reconquering lost lands. Document 1 supports the idea that German imperialism encouraged the arousal of World War II since Germany began to conquer lands all the way to Poland therefore increasing its wealth other imperialistic nations such as Great Britain and France began to fear German further expansion to the whole European continent which would leave them as just another subordinate power rather than a global imperialist economy and caused them to act against the threatening Nazi regime. Document 3, is a newspaper article in which Hitler is presumed guilty of violating the Treaty of Versailles by creating an army, invading Rhineland, and promising to bring Germany to an equal level to that of great powers. Also, it explains how France told on Germany with the League of Nations for breaking the Treaty of Versailles yet there was no action against such. Document 3 supports this position by giving evidence of German imperialism through the conquering of states like Rhineland and foreign disagreement to such, in this case France who pressured the League of Nations to take actions since other imperial societies themselves were in danger of falling into German control…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the benefits of punishing Germany didn’t outweigh the drawbacks. In short, Germany was made to accept full blame for World War I, being required to pay reparations for all the damages done to the allied countries with the War Guilt Clause. This drawback left Germany locally humiliated and ruined. After Germany's worldwide humiliation, the Germans were ready to accept such a leader as Adolph Hitler, who promised to make their country powerful again and regain its boundaries. Therefore, it was a bad idea for the Big Four to punish Germany because if they didn’t there…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Tech

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When the death of Francis Ferdinand marked the beginning of WW1 as a "war to end all wars” It also began, the first War that where the newest and most lethal machines were experimented upon the newly armed troops. Only through these lethal and logical experiments did strategists understand the fatal that weapons were capable of. When the weapons were unleashed, tens of thousands could be killed each hour or even second. From there countries adapted, copied, and completely shattered the old ideals of warfare. The war of the past has become the war of the future through intoxicating and gunning down millions. The weapons and strategies became useless, with these new inventions, such as chemical gas and the automatic weapon. As technology spread one man could bring down an army with these lethal weapons. This new technology forced generals to refute the strategies of old, and embrace a new, modern, tactic.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the information provided to me from the text, and the knowledge I have gained from previous classes, I believe that the nation of Germany should have been represented in the Treaty of Versailles and the War Guilt Clause should have been left out. One quote I have always admired was “forgive but not forget.” The allied nations did not forgive at all. The War guilt put all the blame on an already deprived germany. The war left land destroyed, families torn, and the economy in europe devastated.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Semitism In Ww2

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Article 231 the government agreed and signed the document accepting all the blame for World War 1 while many Germans disagreed with this idea. “The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Article 231, Treaty of Versaille) While the treaty was made to create peace it only backlashed and was one of the biggest reasons for World War 2. German’s felt unfairly blamed since the war was not all their fault.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Like how they made a new article in the Treaty of Versailles, “Article 160 that limited the number of troops Germany can have and how many of each division they can have”(Doc E). Also that the army must be devoted exclusively to the maintenance of order within the territory. So they pretty much told they what they had to do and they couldn’t do it any other way except that way. They also blame Germany because they stepped up during the war and sank ships and Germany lose their freedom of navigation upon the seas. Then in (Doc F) it says that they made another article in the Treaty of Versailles, article 231 which blamed Germany for starting the war. Like how they said Germany and Austria-Hungary deliberately worked to defeat all the may conciliatory proposals made by the Entente Powers. They also said that “Germany and her allies caused all the loss and been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies”(Doc F). They blamed Germany for everything even though it was not only their fault. The Germans were forced to sign that treaty that would make their lives miserable like how Germany was “demanded by the victors to pay the bill and plan to punish us as the guilty party”(Doc I). This quote is pretty much showing that the treaty is making Germany pay for all the damage even though they weren’t the only country…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles in which they admitted to be responsible for the war. This was article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles. This is in preparation for article 232 of the Treaty of Versailles, in which the Treaty of Versailles stated that Germany should pay reparations or compensation for the damage done to the allies.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1918, “the ‘War Guilt Clause’ of the Treaty of Versailles held Germany and Austria-Hungary responsible for the entire conflict and imposed on them crippling financial sanctions, territorial dismemberment and isolation. Germany, for example, was forced to demilitarise the Rhineland and abolish its air force. Some scholars say that the terms of the treaty were unnecessarily harsh and led to mounting anger in Germany in particular over subsequent decades, but, the BBC says ‘it would be a mistake to imagine that the Treaty of Versailles was the direct cause of World War 2’.” It brought them to kill the jews because of the financial…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weapons In The Vietnam War

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The method of warfare used in the Twentieth Century and beyond would change due to the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The modern era of this day and age is under constant threat from new and expanding methods of conflict that is devastating our already deteriorating society- often segregated between the rich and the poor. Due to the steady increase of communication and travel, there is a correlation with the increase amount of fighting with age old ethnic rivalries and religious strife along with disputes over territory, resources and morals. However, with the considerable advancements in technology presented over the last century, the effects and devastation are more vast and noteworthy. Prior instances being the innovation of the Maxim Machine gun in the nineteenth century that took the lives of millions of people in World War I, the bringer of the war of…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lot of effort has been devoted to analyzing the protracted bloody wars of the 20th Century when mass killings were “perpetrated by and against a wide range of nations, cultures, forms of government, ethnic and religious groups” (Mingst and Snyder 2008, 368) with brazen zeal to wipe out entire races for power and control. For most disposed people of the world – the ‘bottom billion’ as Collier refers to them, unchecked power takes away the freedom of the other and replaces it with terror and the primitive fear of being controlled. It is estimated that during the 20th Century alone, between 60 million to 150 million people have died in episodes of mass killings while international and civil wars accounts for about 34 million deaths (Mingst and Snyder 2008, 368).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the biggest interpreted weaknesses was the economics and reparations. Firstly, it highlighted the weaknesses of the delegates forming the Treaty, as they had to listen to public demand which had been exaggerated due to the scale and length of the war. An example was Lloyd George who was pressured from conservatives for harsh reparations, Geddes, a conservative politician hailed the words ‘we shall squeeze the German lemon until the pips squeak.’ [1] Packer declared Lloyd George did not believe in harsh reparations [2] , but George added extras to the original reparations such as war pensions to please the conservatives because the original amount based on war damage gave Britain a very little. Kitchen showed and I agree that there was little Lloyd George could do about the situation as ‘no politician would have survived if he had suggested that Germany should be forgiven.’ [3] However, Lentin disagreed, thinking that public opinion created pressure but had no impact on the Treaty. He later contradicted himself by proclaiming that the one of the causes of the delay in announcing reparations because the delegates believed that the public would never be satisfied with the guaranteed amount. [4] Therefore, public opinion had to be acknowledged and satisfied to a certain extent. This meant the Treaty did not always accomplish what was needed such as lower reparations.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays