Preview

Waiting for Godot: Existentialism and Christianity

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Waiting for Godot: Existentialism and Christianity
Waiting for Godot: Existentialism and Christianity In modern day society, individuals usually experience the same routine over and over again, but rarely become aware of the drudgery of daily life. These people are unable to achieve a higher level of existence by being uniform. Waiting for Godot, by Samuel Beckett, is an existential play where two men are stuck in the same routine day after day. They sit around all day waiting for the inevitable arrival of a man named Godot, who seems like he will never come; the two lose track of time. The men are completely unaware of what day of the week it is; they seem to be achieving nothing in their dull lives due to their tedious ways. Waiting for Godot is more than a mere existential play; there are heavy undertones of Christianity, creating a religious aspect to the play, yet the author manipulates Christian beliefs to strengthen existentialistic ideas. There are many existential elements in this play, mainly monotony and the inability to take action. Both Acts one and two of the play are similar because they contain identical events. First, Vladimir meets Estragon at the same tree. Estragon sleeps in a ditch all night and is continually beaten up. They become acquainted with Pozzo and Lucky, and then a boy notifies them that Godot will arrive tomorrow. At the end of the act, Vladimir and Estragon are unable to leave, and the second act repeats the same sequence of events. Vladimir admits that “habit is a great deadener” (Beckett 105). A fundamental belief of existentialism is, individuals who repeat the same mundane task will not live life to the fullest and are stuck in a lull. The characters in Waiting for Godot are constantly stating that they will take action but do not acquire the initiative to finalize the task. Their life is not complete or entirely satisfied because of their “lack of perfection, power, and control…over their [lives]” (All About Philosophy). Pozzo realizes his inability to maneuver and


Bibliography: Banks, Robert. Complete Book of Everyday Christianity. 1997. Urbana. 7 December 2009 Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. New York: Grove Press, 1954 Cassidy, John Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. 2006. Philosophy Paradise. 30 Nov. 2009

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The purpose of not fulfilling what was hoped for at the end is done to prove that the reason they waited in the first place was because they had hope and didn’t make a change on their own. The play shows the hindrance in decision making. Act II when Vladimir comes and goes, he had no where or has no where to go. “A dog came in…” (37) repetition, circular nursery rhymes, tale about looking for some food (small pleasures in life) you will be beaten and repeat. People need to learn to make the change and find the simple pleasures in life and not wait for someone to come and make it for you. Also, the lines of Vladimir and Estragon in the play can be interchangeable "It hurts?" and responding, "Hurts! He wants to know if it hurts!" The repetition of this kind of dialogue shows the parallelism in the play and that despite their differences, they always come to the same conclusion. The ending has distinct parts where Vladimir has moments of insight and yet there is still repetition because despite his epiphany he never changed. Life is war and life is havoc but the characters are companionate and are dislocated in a life where hope is questionable. Even after a messenger is sent to Estragon and Vladimir, havoc is still the great…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is interesting to see the “evolution” of these 3 worldviews. From the Naturalist who views everything as natural in it’s existence – you exist based on your senses and experiences alone to the Secular Humanist with their realization that humans are wonderful – great creatures with personalities and determinations, but it doesn’t matter…to the Atheistic Existentialist (AE) – who finally realizes that the innermost feelings and desires we have as humans do exist, but would be better off “killed” or cut out than to be nurtured and followed.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument seeks to establish that the universe requires specific and improbable conditions and circumstances in order to function and even more to make life possible. These conditions have to be given in a specific and simultaneous way so that everything we know may exist.This argument try to establish, through rational evidence,the intelligence and purpose of a God, manifested in the design, function, and consummation of all things in creation. It declares that a designer must exist since the universe and living things exhibit design marks in the order, consistency, unity and model of each one of them. For this, they must have been designed by a great designer or a…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in the sixteenth century Elizabethan historical context, where certainty was questioned and there was a growing importance of individuals and their choice as opposed to fate. Influenced by the Renaissance, Shakespeare wrote in the tradition of the revenge tragedy. Stoppard however, who was living in a time of disillusionment due to the tragedies of two world wars, was influenced by the existential movement. Disregarding the past and future due to a lack of trust, Stoppard wrote in a tradition known as the Theatre of the Absurd incorporating existentialism. He uses various processes to adapt and transform the values and ideas influenced by the sixteenth century Elizabethan context in Hamlet to reflect the twentieth century evasion of reality unless it is in a reflexive and directionless present.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in a time of Elizabethan values. The most important value was one of absolute devotion to divinity. This devotion shaped religious thought and the ideas of fate and destiny and the search for meaning contrast greatly to Stoppard’s views which were defined by Existentialist philosophy.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Comparing a novel to a play can be sometimes challenging. When comparing two characters, it is harder to see the similarities than the differences. Hamlet and Billy Pilgrim are two different characters, from two different centuries, from two different countries, from two different worlds, and yet their search for the meaning of life was astonishingly similar. The search for the meaning of life becomes quite difficult for Hamlet and Billy Pilgrim. They both experience horrific adventures in their lives along with insanity which their personalities attract. The delirium that takes place throughout their adventures continuously brings them one step closer to finding the true meaning of life.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Christianity

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Christianity is an ancient religion that is centered on the teachings of Christ. The history of Christianity concerns the Christian religion, its followers and the Church with its various denominations, from the first century to the present. Christianity was founded in the 1st century in the Levant region of the Middle East by Jesus of Nazareth, who is prophesied in the Old Testament to be the Christ or chosen one of God. This religion has been around since 4BC-30AD (the time of Christ). The early Christians believed that there were seven heavens, one physically above the other. They also believed that god is Omni-present, rather than enthroned in the highest heaven. Like the latter, Christianity was originally a movement of oppressed people it first appeared as the religion of slaves and emancipated slaves of poor people deprived of all rights of peoples subjugated or dispersed by Rome. Christianity was the recognized state religion in the Roman World Empire.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grendel & Existentialism

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “I understood that the world was nothing; a mechanical chaos of casual, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understood that, finally and absolutely, I alone exist. All the rest, I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly-as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back.”…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare, world’s most famous, influential, and successful writer for tragic plays in the history incorporated many powerful themes in one of his most well-known play, Hamlet. In the play, hesitation was the driving theme that strongly influenced every character in the story. Each character in the story had their own goals and objectives, whether to kill, to live, to die, or to love. However, due to their hesitation within, most of their objectives were not satisfied, or satisfied with great consequences paid.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruby Cohn says that “Stoppard proved extremely skillful in dovetailing the Hamlet scenes into the Godot situation.” (Gruber 291). While opinions differ, the nods to absurdism permeate Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. These absurdist traits are what make Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead both rendering and relatable to modern audiences. The Wadsworth Anthology of Drama defines theatre of the Absurd as: “a type of late twentieth-century theater and drama, characterized by a relatively abstract setting, and arbitrary and illogical action. It is sometimes said to express the “human condition” in a basic or “existential” way.” This definition perfectly describes Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead as a production. The abstract setting in FSU’s case was the barren desert. this allows the audience to be in tune with the script. Martin Esslin said that “In the Theatre of the Absurd, therefore, the real content of the play lies in the action.” Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead is filled with arbitrary and illogical action. The entire play is a cat and mouse game of life and death. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern buy their time with meaningless games, trivial questions, and long silences. Both modern and absurdist drama aim to create a connection with the audience. This connection is one that modern audiences…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humankind, since its inception, has been on a collective quest to define the true meaning of life. Not only the purpose of humankind’s existence but, as well as the role humans play in the vastness of an endlessly expanding universe. This very inquiry has sparked countless theories, philosophies and controversial ridden debates with the sole intention of seeking the truth of humankind’s purpose beyond what meets the eye. Hamlet of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is on a similar quest to enlighten himself on his own purpose, which are revealed through the events that transpire in the play. Hamlet follows the story of the Prince of Denmark, Hamlet. Closely following after his father’s death, his newly widowed mother remarries…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Shakespeare’s context influences to view death as a pathway to eternity and an afterlife and Stoppard’s context influences nihilism and existentialism of no afterlife the resultant idea in both plays are very similar. Shakespeare explores the idea largely through his soliloquys whilst Stoppard examines it in conversation, trying to test its significance. Guil questions whether; “Death’s death, isn’t it?” while Ros reaches the same conclusion as Hamlet that life must surely be preferable to death when h says “life in a box is better than no life at all”. Here the concept of confinement becomes an extended metaphor for the lack of man’s control of his own life. Similarly free choice or destiny is an idea that is examined in both plays. Hamlet is full of self-reproach for his failure to act and his debilitating indecisions, and Ros mirrors this frustration when he asks Guil; “shouldn’t we be doing something constructive?” the failure of the protagonist in both plays to dedicate their own destinies or take action into their own hands helps develop the audiences perception of them as helpless victims in situations outside their control. Both Ros and Guil do a double take as they read the letters that seals their fate; “without delay of any kind, should those bearers Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, put to sudden death.” Stoppard has sieved these techniques to establish that no one has any real control over the circumstances in their lives no matter what the age or context of society. This further concludes that no matter how many significant elements are transformed there must always be parallels that remain constant in both texts to provoke the viewer’s…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lone ant assisting a colony of ants in building. Martin Luther King Jr. leading thousands of people during the march from Selma to Montgomery. A man practicing soccer so he can join his college soccer team. What do these subjects have in common? They each have a sense of purpose. Whether it’s evolutionary purpose, such as an ant building an ant hill, or a sense of moral purpose, such as protesting for the rights of African-Americans. Everything on this earth has potential given by God, and can be maximize if recognized and understood.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two men approach me and claim that Jesus Christ was a man, but denied his deity. If I were to show them the truth, I would have to explain the biblical basis of Jesus' humanity, deity, explain how he can be both man and God, and explain what this all means to me. First though, biblical explanation of Jesus' humanity is essential.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jean-Paul Sartre once said, “Man is condemned to be free; because once he is thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does.” Sartre speaks in accordance with the values of Existentialism, which is defined as a philosophical theory that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will. Existentialists like Sartre rejected the existence of a higher power and the over arching influence of an unnatural conformist society, citing instead the importance of individuality and acts of one’s own free will. According to the doctrine of Existentialism, life is not satisfying yet has meaning. The singular purpose of life is to drive forward into the infinite macrocosm of the universe, searching for one’s own particular meaning of life. Additionally, Existentialists propose that there is no god; there is no big man in the sky creating destinies for the humble earthly beings below. Thus, random instances of elation, violence, and tragedy do not hold a greater significance with a supposed higher power or with the universe itself. Life is an experience specific to man alone. Albert Camus, in relation to this philosophy, delivered to the literary world his existentialist work, The Plague, a novel based on the central theme of the inanity of human suffering and the deep individuality of the human experience. In the pages of this novel and through his characters and themes, Camus paints a picture of a mundane community thrust into an almost illogical, if tragic, state of disease and disaster. His unremarkable town of Oran, that in no way deserved such a virulent visitation of plague, sets a perfect stage for the exemplification of existential teachings.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays