Preview

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Labelling Processes.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Labelling Processes.
Assess the view that crime and deviance are the products of the labelling process (21 marks)

The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.

Significant others are those who are in high social power and thus able to dictate influence and actively determine an individual’s life. Such individuals may include police officers, prison officers, politicians, parents and teachers. Feminists would argue however that these are all the males in society, determining and controlling the lives of females, keeping society patriarchal. The influence that significant others place on individuals lives is through the use of labels, the labels aren’t usually based on individual characteristics, more so stereotypes, working assumptions and professional knowledge. For example Cicaurel found that police patrolled working class areas more intensively, resulting in more arrests, this is due to the police’s stereotypical view that delinquent individuals are part of the working class.

Lemert distinguishes between primary and secondary deviance in society. Primary deviance involves minor offences such as vandalism or smoking underage and these acts are usually uncaught or insignificant. However an individual may be caught for such acts and inturn be labelled as delinquent or deviant, the social reaction of this label results in the development of secondary deviance: more serious crimes such as assault or drugs. This therefore illustrates that it is not the act itself but the hostile societal reaction by significant others that creates serious deviance, thus crime and deviance being products of the labelling process.
Support

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. According to labeling theory, the major element in determining the criminality of an individual is the reaction of society.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Chapter 9

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Critical Review: The most serious crimes are committed by those whose 
psychological profiles are normal 
Social Foundations of Deviance…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When studying crime and deviance, in particular the causes of crime, it is often useful to look at the reasons behind why people commit crimes in the first place. For interactionists, crime and deviance is a product of labelling. They believe that when a crime is committed, it is because a public application of a negative description of a powerless individual has occurred and that is the reason why a crime has been committed by that individual. Labelling is deterministic of your future life. Interactionists reject official statistics on crime, seeing them as little more than a social construction. They maintain that they vastly underestimate the extent of crime and do not present an accurate picture of crime in society.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast to this, Haan investigates the result of the increasing stigmatisation of young offenders. He found that if an individual is negatively labelled from the offset, it could push them towards a deviant career. This could indicate that crime and…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker argued that deviance is not a quality of the act person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others of the rules and sanctions to an “offender”, the deviant has been successfully associated with the label which means that the deviant behaviour is behaviour people label. Due to an individual being labelled it can have possible effects as a label defines a person as being a particular character and as it is not neutral, it has master status. Because of this an individual may internalise the label leading to self fulfilling prophecy. This may encourage further deviance. For example, drug addicts may turn to crime to support their habit since “respectable employers” refuse to give them a job. Becker argued that once individuals joined an organised deviant group, they are more likely to see themselves as a deviant and act in terms of this self- concept.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Constructionism

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal career is composed of re-offenses due to lack of social integration, exclusion from mainstream structures and in some cases renegation of the societal norms. The deviant is theorized to perceive no other choice but further deviance because the label attached to their discovery turns them into untrustworthy or even dangerous individuals. The social response only creates a backlash that manifests as acceptance of the label, retreatment from society or…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    21 Mark Essay – Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of labelling theory in explaining crime and deviance.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tannenbaum (1938); Lemert (1951) and Becker (1963) were amongst the first theorists to explore Labelling Theory as an aspect of criminality and the criminal justice system applicable to westernised societies. In particular, Tannerbaum (1938) has been attributed as the first labelling theorist and his main concept suggested that labelling is society’s way of ‘dramatising evil’. He claimed that “tagging, segregating, describing and emphasising aspects of an individual as deserving of special treatment”…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Youth crime has always been a concern in societies around the world. People try to determine the causes to which these problems stem from. This topic intrigued me, so I decided to write an essay on the question relating to this topic, "What are the social causes of youth crime?" The theory that I am going to examine and use to answer this question is the labeling theory. This theory is also known as the societal reaction theory. The labeling theory will often examine the offender in the situation. This theory not only examines the offender, but also the victim and the situation as a whole, instead of breaking it down. This theory claims that a "deviant" is only what the society around him/her describes him as. It also goes on to explain that the reason that many individuals become deviant is because they either grew up in a deviant social surrounding or they are unable to negotiate the rigors of everyday life.…

    • 3303 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This theory argues that deviance is a social construction, as no act is deviant in itself in all situations; it only becomes deviant when others label it as such.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics