In the video “Darfur in Ten Minutes”/ Pete McCormack explains three reasons for the Civil War in Sudan. One of the three reason of the civil war is ethnic tension Sudan is split into three regions North Sudan, South Sudan, and Darfur or West Sudan. All three have either different religion or ethnicity, North Sudan are Arabic and Muslims. South Sudan are ethnically Black and Christian, and Darfur are Black and Muslim. They’re considered one Country and the government is in North Sudan so they only look out for the Northern Sudanese. Before Sudan was Controlled by Great Britain, for that there was many different tribes. After 1950s Britain left and Sudanese don’t really call themselves Sudan but their tribe. Every tribe wanted to more superior…
In the book Darfur and the Crime of Genocide by John Hagan and Wenona Rymond-Richmond, the authors discuss the atrocities in Darfur from a criminological viewpoint. The book is split up into 8 chapters, all discussing very important topics and issues. The prologue to the book introduces the problems in Darfur by use of a testimony from former Secretary of State Colin Powell before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee calling the massacre in Darfur genocide. From this point on, the book discusses Darfur before the massacre, gives eyewitness accounts and testimonies and gives the arguments government officials used to deny the accusations of genocide.…
According to the article, “Darfur Genocide,” this genocidal campaign results in the deaths of 300,000 people and the displacement of 3 million others. Further, the rebels and the government tried talking peace and “signed a ceasefire agreement and began long-term peace talks (Darfur Genocide).” However, since 2011 no additional progress has been made and violence has only grown more according to the article, “Darfur Genocide.” The indifference in the Sudan government and their allies Janjaweed has become destructive and…
External military and diplomatic intervention has been the key to solving major civil conflicts and preventing possible genocides in countries such as sierra Leone and Libya while people in countries such as Rwanda and currently in Syria endure the worst because of the blind eye or unwillingness to react to atrocities against humanity by the international community.…
Darfur, Sudan is in western Africa with Egypt to the north, Ethiopia to the east, and Chad to the left. Darfur is a place where a conflict involving the Janjaweed, a government-supported militia recruited from local Arab tribes, and the non-Arab people of the region. This is a place where both sides are largely black in skin tone, and the distinction between "Arab" and "anon-Arab" and is disputed heavily by the Sudanese government. In a country with a population of (since July 2005) 40,187,486, the people of this country are only projected to live up to approximately 58.54 years. This is thanks to the region, climate, and governmental situation of the area. As for the economy, Darfur's economy is based on the subsistence of agriculture.…
“The “Darfur Genocide” refers to the current mass slaughter and rape of Darfuri men, women and children in Western Sudan” (“Darfur”).These killings of Darfuri villagers began in 2003 and as of today, over 480,000 have been brutally murdered. This crisis is still ongoing, even though action is being taken by other countries and organizations to stop the violence. Suffering is still constant in Darfur as of today and will not be abolished until peace is ensured in the country (“Darfur”).…
In “The Purpose of Intervention”, Finnemore aims to highlight the changes that have taken place in both global patterns of intervention and the ways in which international societal views of what constitutes the “legitimate” use of force, have evolved historically. Finnemore argues that while humanitarian intervention has continued to exist throughout history, the specific normative justifications surrounding it have changed.…
In 2003, a genocide began in the Darfur region of Sudan. According to the website, “World Without Genocide” the Sudanese government armed arab militia groups to attack ethnic affair groups. This has escalated to the mass slaughter of 480,000 people. The Sudanese government called this campaign “getting at the fish by draining the sea”. This is why countries around the world should open up their eyes and help a country that is going through a genocide.…
Although there may be probable cause for intervention, we still shouldn’t interfere until explicitly asked or told to by the Security Council. As seen in previous readings, often intervention fails meet the nation building effort we put in. Therefore if we go in with the actual humanitarian reasons we claim to have, we will always succeed. However, we always have these underlying motivations and goals that we never seem to be able to reach.…
The Game Darfur is Dying is a game where you have to go through what the people in Darfur are going through. You are given the experience of suffering through hunger, loss of a family member or friend, and torture and pain. You are given the option to choose an avatar that varies from male to female from the age of 10 to a fully grown adult in their thirties. The first part of the game is to forage for water, but it is not as easy as it sounds. You have to run and hide from Janjaweed militias that pass by; if you are caught you are subject to terrible torture and even death. After you are able to pass this part, you are given the responsibility of keeping the camp alive by taking care of crops and supplies, and being prepared for attacks by the Janjaweed militias. The game is quite challenging giving the player a virtual experience.…
The conflict in Sudan Darfur region has been a place where infighting occurs throughout centuries which largely breaks the balance of the power in the international community, thus achieving world order through various legal measures and remedies were urgent and desperate in need. This effort is not limited to negotiations but includes consultations among Darfur society over their concerns to realize comprehensive and lasting peace. The role of United Nation and its main body ICC and the court ICJ are also crucial in bringing effective dealing according to this issue in order to achieve world order.…
Whilst nation states have a responsibility to protect, state sovereignty ultimately hinders the achievement of world order. State sovereignty relies to the ultimate law-making process of a state over its territory and population, including independence from external interference, as exemplified domestically in Section 51 of the Australian Constitution. Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) (1945), stipulates that ‘nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the interference of any state’. Due to the non-mandatory nature of multilateral compliance, states can ultimately impede the influence of international law and use state sovereignty as a barrier to their conduct, as shown in the conflicts of Sudan, Kosovo, Libya and East Timor. However, the nationally acclaimed benchmark ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) (2005)’, originating from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s Report, places the onus on nation states to ensure the protection of their citizens from instances of mass atrocity. The UN, enshrining of their doctrine under paragraph 138 and 139 of the Charter of the UN, bridges the limitations of state sovereignty with international law. Unfortunately, nation states may still abstain from participation with international law…
-A current mass slaughter of Darfuri men, women and children that began in the spring of 2003…
Genocide is one of the most tragic events that could ever happen, when a group of people are deliberately killed and tortured, usually just based on ethnicity. Genocide causes sorrow, anger and a loss of hope. Friends and family are often killed in front of their loved ones in a split second, and when are gone, nothing can be done. One of the most famous genocides is the Holocaust, yet many people do not realize that genocides are happening even today. An example of a genocide still happening now is in Sudan, where many Darfuri people are being killed every single day. Although the conflict in Darfur is not recognized as a genocide by Sudan’s government, it is safe to conclude a genocide occurring because innocent Darfuri people are being segregated, killed, and deprived of their basic needs.…
The issue of humanitarian intervention has become increasingly prominent in worldwide debates regarding its role in ethics and legitimacy in international relations. Uncertainty arises as to whether there are any moral obligation for humanitarian intervention and the concerning justifications of the violation of state sovereignty. In viewing the matter ethically and applying Immanuel Kant’s principle of cosmopolitan law from his 1795 essay Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay, humanitarian intervention can be established as a conflict between a cosmopolitan responsibility, which is to protect and promote human rights because of their universality, and an obligation to respect state sovereignty as a crucial basis for moral and political international order. Inevitably, fulfilling one set of responsibilities can involve the violation of the other in situations for example where governments are actively abusing the fundamental rights of their own citizens. Many Third World leaders consider the concept of humanitarian intervention to be potentially destabilizing for the international system, and view it as an excuse for more powerful nations to undermine and threaten their state sovereignty. By using the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) as a reference point, this essay will investigate the relationships between states when dealing with human rights standards and cultural differences. In examining the doctrine of ‘the responsibility to protect’, this essay will justify humanitarian intervention as a moral requirement of international order by focusing on the idea that the broader community of states must assume the responsibility of intervention when individual sovereign states are unwilling or unable to protect their own citizens from avoidable catastrophe. Using ethnographic examples, fundamental political theories will be examined thoroughly as I deem Third World suspicion…