Preview

Truth in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Truth in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Research Paper

TRUTH IN JULIUS CAESAR.

Shakespeare

[pic]

Albert Camus said “Truth, like light, blinds”. This similie, used in The Fall is meant to reveal the ambiguity of this notion. Truth is a concept that obviously defines the quality of being true as opposed to false. It is like rooted in every human being, as an ultimate goal, nearly as powerful as any belief because it requires faith as well. Also, it is well-known that one of the main philosophical representations of truth is a blinding sun. In Julius Caesar, a tragedy written by Shakespeare in 1599, there is something worth saying about the opposition between light and darkness as suggestive of the opposition between truth and lie in the play.

Julius Caesar is based on the story of the famous emperor’s assassination but William Shakespeare heightens the conspiracy which led to his death and threw light on the use of truth to reach one’s goal. As in a bipolar world made of good and evil, light and darkness, there is a duality between truth and lie in the play. How this dualism applies to Shakespeare’s work?

In the first place, it is important to keep in mind that truth is an abstract concept, meant to disqualify lie and liars by approving or not a statement. But truth is also linked to reality in the sense of it is a conformity to a fact in which one should trust, it has to be seen to be believed. Finally, it is important to dicover the “true truth” about fact and fiction, between history and the story.

* * *

To begin with the analysis of truth in Julius Caesar, it is absolutly important to define what the meaning of this term is. Truth is the conformity between what it is said and the reality of things. It is a statement proven to be or accepted as true.[1]
It is obvious that in a story of a murder plot, truth will be used in a misapproporiate way. Julius Caesar, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The killing of Julius Caesar was not so much an act of simple brutality as it was a significant turning point in history. The play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare depicts various members of Roman society conspiring to and eventually killing Julius Caesar; subsequently causing chaos to spread in Rome. During their orations, Brutus and Antony employ various strategies in order to receive the crowd’s support in their respective causes.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Caesar was one sneaky person. He was like the friend that you think you are really close to and can trust and then takes the first chance and stabs you in the back. Julius Caesar was kidnapped by pirates (“Julius Caesar “). While they kept him captive he made a bond with the pirates and called them his “family” (“Julius Caesar”). One day the pirates docked the ship, to show power Caesar ran and had all the pirates killed (“Julius Caesar”). Now coming from the person to call these people family and then have them killed, Caesar is not a trusting type of person.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ABPSN LIT

    • 6156 Words
    • 21 Pages

    TRUTH: Is the opposite of falsehood and cannot change or pass away. Truth never had a beginning, therefore it can have no ending. In a general sense, truth is Allah. Truth always was, is, and forever more will be.…

    • 6156 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lastly, the other thing that is similar is the plot of each. In short, these two pieces of…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Act I Q A

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Why have Caesar and his attendants gathered in a public square near the Forum?…

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Caesars death Antony requested to speak at his funeral. Antony was a very good friend of Caesar. In his eulogy, Antony denies accusations of Caesar being “too ambitious” and retorts with examples of how good of a man he really was in his eyes. Antony firmly believes Caesar was innocent and that his murder cannot be justified. He speaks to the Plebeians, the Roman people…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cicero states “Men may construe things after their fashion,” (Act I Scene iii, Page 37, Lines 34–35) Often, misperception and misreading can drastically affect the outcome of people in their lives. Misperception and misreading not only affects the characters in Julius Caesar, it also affects everybody’s decisions in their day-to-day lives. In much of Shakespeare’s tragedy, the reader witnesses the idea of misperception and misreading of omens and events as they occur throughout the book. It is by his own misperception that Brutus is manipulated, and it is because of Decius Brutus’s misreading of Calpurnia’s dream that Caesar is killed later that day. Also, it is due to misperceptions the citizens of Rome are so easily swayed by Antony’s speech in the marketplace and Cassius commits suicide. Misperceptions and misreadings both shape and carry the plot throughout the book and are the main theme in it.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personalities, events or situations often elicit conflicting perspectives. To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of conflicting perspectives.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal concerns.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, many people could argue for and against the killing of Julius Caesar. Personally I believe that his murder was not justified enough to be conducted. My belief is supported by the fact that the conspirators decision was made purely on belief and jealously, and not factual evidence that would support taking Caesar’s life.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare demonstrates the idea of everything having an opposing truth in his play Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare’s play reveals that not everything is as it appears through its plot, the character’s language, and the events that take place. He demonstrates this with two literary devices; Duality and double entendre. The dualities in his play consist of love and hate, good and evil, and light and dark.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defends the noble Brutus. " Brutus is an honorable man"(300), so if he tells of Caesar being ambitious then you all should believe him. He expresses to everyone the reasons and times, "as he was ambitious"(300). Everything had a reason and truth behind it and for this is why they believed Antony. For, " Antony himself was an honorable…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that Caesar's death is just something that has being pending among everyone because there must…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar is a play with many central ideas, but one in particular stands out to its readers. Shakespeare shows in Julius Caesar that following people blindly can end in conflict through the plot.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays