Preview

Tragedy of the Commons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tragedy of the Commons
The article "Tragedy of the Commons" explains Hardin's theory that a misguided or mistaken use of the human ethics is catastrophic and will result in what he called "Tragedy of the Commons". In this article, Hardin explains that "commons" are resources shared by the society as a whole with access to that "commons" without restrictions. Those are resources with maximum capacity and limit to support its usage. In his example on the herdsman, Hardin demonstrated the irrational behavior and unethical thinking of an individual for his own advantage to increase his demands on the commons. The result of this absurdity in behavior and unethical thinking maximized the capacity and consumption limit of that "commons" thus everyone who have access to that "commons" equally shared the harmful affect the "Tragedy to the Commons". In the article "Tragedy of the Commons", Hardin, claims that "human problems" have classes and cannot be resolved through science and technology, instead it will just generate another problem.

In this article Hardin relates the theory of the "Tragedy of the Commons" to other parts of the environment such as the national parks and pollution. National Parks are open for everyone without limitation such as the "Yosemite Valley". As population grew, the park gets crowded and the enjoyment the visitors previously experienced started to degrade thus devalue the importance and significance of the park itself. Hardin had mentioned several options to treat the park as commons to bring back its value and significance to the people as their national park. To mention one was to keep it public property but allocate the right to enter them which obviously will cause conflict to those taxpayers accessing the park and contributed to its construction. The options Hardin had mentioned needs to be given attention to maintain and protect the National Park from exploitation.

According to Hardin pollution was another aspect of the "Tragedy of the Commons". Pollution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In his essay “Glen Canyon Submersus” Wallace Stegner writes “In gaining the lovely and the usable, we have given up the incomparable” (509). In this quote he is talking about the loss of Glen Canyon during the creation of Lake Powell, and more broadly, talking about how national parks often destroy wildernesses despite their apparent usefulness. Glen Canyon is only one of thousands of examples of an environment being destroyed by a government funded park system. There are several theorized reasons for why parks are often harmful to the environment as well as many possible solutions for this problem as well. But so far, the majority of national parks in the world are harmful to both the natural environment…

    • 2701 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main point made in the reading passage is that sharing the ownership of lands, which is called commons, made more benefits for everyone in the colonies of New England. However, the professor argues that commons did not work well in reality.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In trying to achieve sustainability within the society, the Grapes of Wrath presents different scenarios that involve the struggles of life and survival, the many challenges people encounter and what it takes to attain a sustainable lifestyle. The film is centered on the family unit, the societal perceptions of what the family ought to be and the difficulties involved in sustaining the family unit together. It is a film that highlights the importance of moral uprightness, the significance of finances and what holds societal institutions together to ensure a sustainable…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is The World Food Bank, an organization in the process of being established during the time of the essay’s publication. The goal of the organization, in short, was to provide food for people in countries that had a lack of it. This is, of course, completely in opposition to what Hardin argues we should do, and so it is a very good example. To demonstrate why a global food bank is a bad idea, Hardin attacks it from several angles. First, he debases its intention, stating that while it “appeals powerfully to our humanitarian impulses”, it is not as pure of motive as its lobbyists claimed it to be. He outlines that an organization like that would mean “’Billions for U.S Business’”, using the past example of the “Food for peace program” that did indeed, in historical fact, profit its creators much more than its supposed benefactors. After showing corruption in modern institution of charity, Hardin then defeats it in its own terms, or in other words he argues against it as if it was in reality pure in its intentions. He argues that helping the overpopulated poor only leads to more overpopulation, and therefore a greater demand, that defeats possibility and would ultimately deplete the world’s resources, leading to the suffering of our posterity. Here, Hardin thoroughly defeats…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “ Everybody’s Guilty – The Ecological Dilemma, “ author and professor of Human Ecology at University of California, Santa Barbara, Garrett Hardin, explains the current issue with invisible reverberations. Hardin calls attention to the readers about how innocent actions by individuals can inflict on the environment. “ We all acquiesce in the system of arrangements and practices that has created our ecological crisis” (Hardin, 40). In order to approve of our actions, individuals tend to hide from reality behind symbols and/or words. Incorporating rhetoric into our everyday lives does this.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Commons was described as a large open forest area that was open for anyone to utilize. In the modern world, there is no such thing as a Commons. With Andy’s lecture I can understand the comparison between the peasants of old England and the peasants of modern “poor” countries. The peasants of England were pictured as helpless, but even through all these adversities, the Commons were a place to go if all else fails. Peasants of today have no similar options, but instead are shut out of society and left to protect themselves. Something that the two parties share is that both lived (or have lived) in a society that is dominated by the rich. The wealthy have the power to control the resources the poor have access to like how the Commons were taken from the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would be sincerely grateful if you and your association would reconsider developing in National Parks. This is due to the amount of money being spent for development compared to how much is being used for sustaining the environment, the decline of health in ecosystems, and the continuation of development in national…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yosemite's history shows its importance in the broader ecological conservation movement. On a span of almost 200 years, from its discovery through the end of the second World War II, Yosemite faced multiple threats ranging from lodging, tourism to the construction of an invasive dam. A pinnacle of natural beauty, Yosemite remains a highly popular tourist attraction and subject of worry for many…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grapes Of Wrath Analysis

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the early chapters of the Grapes of Wrath, John Steinback wasted no time in describing in which way humans can provide for one another. Jim Casey had been roaming the farm lands for quite sometime, a-thinkin’ an’ a-wonderin’ about humans and God. However, over the years he had grown lonely. He…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Muir and Abbey

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is difficult to find writers more passionate about the natural environment than John Muir and Edward Abbey. Both Muir in a section from his book A Thousand-Mile Walk to the Gulf and Abbey in a chapter titled Polemic: Industrial Tourism and the National Parks channel anger and frustration at the environmental policies of their time into literature that argues fervently for preservation of national parks and other areas of wilderness. In Hetch Hetchy Valley, Muir reverently describes in vivid detail the beautiful landscape of a river valley in Yosemite called the Hetch Hetchy Valley, condemning anyone who supports a government plan to dam the Hetch Hetchy River and flood the valley. In a famous quote Muir says, “no holier temple has ever been consecrated by the heart of man” (Muir 112). Abbey employs a highly sarcastic and satirical tone to outline the consequences of further expansion of roads and highways into national parks. He aims to incite anger with sharp language and insults to draw the reader in emotionally. “This is a courageous view, admirable in its simplicity and power… It is also quite insane” (Abbey 422). Both pieces easily stand alone, but when looked at together they suggest even more strongly that it is deceptive and dishonest to advertise industrialization of wilderness as any kind of favorable progress for society. This “progress” does not actually benefit anyone. Those who proclaim this as their reason for supporting industrial development are more likely motivated by the short-term economic benefits they will receive.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defenders of nature became divided between fervent “preservationists” who wanted to stop all human intrusions and more moderate “conservationist.”…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Hardin's " Tragedy of the Commons," and Diamonds, "The World as Polder: What Does it Mean to Us Today?," One can see how Hardin's main points relate to Diamonds, because both dissect the unsustainable aspects of our society. Both authors use different methods to get their point across, however their main points are very similar. Although Diamond closely looks at past societal collapses, and what aspects of their society caused their collapses, Hardin's current view of the modern worlds unsustainable population, has many characteristic to the older society's that Diamond discusses in his essay. For example Hardin look at our increasing population and how we are over indulging in our resources, that will soon run out if we're not careful. While on the other hand, Diamond describes how over population was a major reason for the Easter Islanders collapse.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Muir

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Muir, the founder of modern environmentalism, wrote many books on American environmentalism and was vocal in preserving America’s natural landscape. He grew up studying the natural environment and fell in love with its beauty and interconnections. He devoted his life to protecting the landscape from industrialization and the “Manifest Destiny” mentality of the late 19th century and early 20th century. Railroads quickened the expansion westward, and desire for cultivating newly ready resources left the land scarred. Newly available land in the west was also a magnet for Americans eager to farm and tame the land. America was quickly expanding westward and the process was happening so fast that thoughts on the cost/benefits of this expansion hadn’t surfaced. Muir befriended the likes of Teddy Roosevelt and the railroad executive E.H. Harriman to organize actions that benefitted all parties. Muir’s efforts towards his vision were founding the environmental agency “The Sierra Club” and writing articles for Century Magazine, which prompted Congress to create Yosemite National Park. In the article Protecting Yosemite, Muir discusses the challenges and benefits involved in the process of creation and after effects of Yosemite Park. Certain groups strived to benefit economically from the resources of the park, while Muir and others persisted in protecting the park’s best interest from the economically driven parties. There was also critiquing and revising the park system throughout the entire process. Muir kept focus on the beauty of the park throughout the article as a whole. As America was creating its new geographical and industrial image westward, most Americans focused on taming the landscape, while John Muir rebelled against this and fought to preserve the natural beauty of America.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Wilderness

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his speech “Why Wilderness?”, Roderick Frazier Nash uses his power of persuasion, knowledge, and personal belief to convey how essential our wilderness is. He is trying to accomplish two things; persuading the reader that wilderness is important enough to put forth an effort into preserving it, and present to the (already pro-wilderness) audience how he believes they should do so. By contrasting the past and present of our wilderness and what we have and haven’t done to keep it, Nash suggests that we are not currently on the correct path. Nash does an excellent job of proving to the reader and the audience that change is in order without bombarding them with negativity.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Klein mentions that people join the AGM because of similar interests and ideologies, which might be different from the regular mass. I personally think that people who do not agree with the common norms of society join these groups in an attempt to show their rebellious attitude towards the big corporations and political powers. It is a known fact that one individual cannot tackle an entire organization and therefore,…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays