Preview

Theory X and Theory Y

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X and Theory Y
Understanding Team Member Motivation What motivates employees to go to work each morning? Many people get great satisfaction from their work and take great pride in it; Others may view it as a burden, and simply work to survive.
This question of motivation has been studied by management theorists and social psychologists for decades, in attempts to identify successful approaches to management.
Social psychologist Douglas McGregor of MIT expounded two contrasting theories on human motivation and management in the 1960s: The X Theory and the Y Theory. McGregor promoted Theory Y as the basis of good management practice, pioneering the argument that workers are not merely cogs in the company machinery, as Theory X-Type organizations seemed to believe.
The theories look at how a manager's perceptions of what motivates his or her team members affects the way he or she behaves. By understanding how your assumptions about employees’ motivation can influence your management style, you can adapt your approach appropriately, and so manage people more effectively.
Understanding the Theories
Your management style is strongly influenced by your beliefs and assumptions about what motivates members of your team: If you believe that team members dislike work, you will tend towards an authoritarian style of management; On the other hand, if you assume that employees take pride in doing a good job, you will tend to adopt a more participative style.
Theory X
Theory X assumes that employees are naturally unmotivated and dislike working, and this encourages an authoritarian style of management. According to this view, management must actively intervene to get things done. This style of management assumes that workers:
• Dislike working.
• Avoid responsibility and need to be directed.
• Have to be controlled, forced, and threatened to deliver what's needed.
• Need to be supervised at every step, with controls put in place.
• Need to be enticed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Motivation is one of the most essential part to a business or an organisation, the reason to this is because without motivation your employees would not have the desire and will to do something or to push their self a little harder to get something finished. For example if someone doesn’t get out of bed to get to college, work or a meeting this shows that they are not willing to either learn, work or meet someone therefore this isn’t a motivated person. Every individual will have a way they get motivated, not everyone has the same motivation strategy therefore each employee will have their own way to be motivated, and some of the things which will motivate someone are money and deadlines.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mgt 330

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages

    2. Be familiar with Theory X and Theory Y managers (teachers). (Table 1-2, p. 7) Outdated Theory X – most people hate work and need to be directed, they must be threatened with punishment before they will work….Modern Theory Y – work is natural, people can direct themselves, people will become oriented with organizational goals is they are rewarded for doing so, typical employee can welcome responsibility, typical person is creative, imaginative and has ingenuity.…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hcs 325

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to The San Diego Business Journal motivating employees is the key issue for most managers; job discussions and training focus their managers on how to motivate their employees. With the proper motivation of their employees a much higher level of performance and productivity will occur, however, not every employee responds to the same motivation every individual responds differently to certain motivational techniques. In this assignment will be looking at different motivational techniques and approaches, the main question that a company whether it be large or small has is on how they motivate their employees, how does a particular technique work, and when to apply a certain technique and most certainly who they should apply this to? Motivation will increase innovation and productivity in a workplace. Motivation has a huge influence on productivity, every leader, manager, or supervisor must understand what particular motivational techniques to use on each employee in order to capitalize on the best performance of each and every employee. Each individual has his or her own set of values that life has given them; it is these values that a person has that will make them act differently in a particular motivational technique.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AVM 300 Assignment 4

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Motivational Theories have provided companies with systems that allow Managers and Workers to develop methods or tactics to be effective in the workplace. Managers may develop behavioral methods based on established systems, a system currently utilized by a boss, or a system that is forced by the workers. Most workers wait to be motivated, which is not necessarily the best way to get what they want. Because most workers have a direct interest in being motivated to work, they should not only participate in the process, but should take the lead.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    man1100

    • 2457 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to McGregor Theory X is described as the way manager make assumptions of their employees. The assumption is that the workers are lazy, have little aspiration, are intolerant to their work and tend to evade accountabilities (Waddell, Jones & George, n.d.). Therefor managers take on a standard operating procedures (SOP’s) approach to motivate staff, this is a “specific set of written instructions about how to perform certain aspects of a task” (Waddell, Jones & George, n.d.).Theory X managers give very little autonomy to their employees, as they believe their role is to closely supervise workers.…

    • 2457 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In any organization the key role of managers is the motivation of their personnel. This can be done in many different ways. This section will discuss three academic theories on how to properly motivate employees.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory Y and X

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both theories which are explained in the journal have very different but fundamental approaches in managing people. In the journal, Dave uses theory X ('authoritarian management' style) showing that he wishes to follow the targets which have been set and avoid any additional responsibility. Relatively showing that he is not ambitious and does not consider his employees as vital as the success of the business. This as stated in the journal has led Dave’s staff to believe that he has done nothing but used them to achieve what he wants, resulting in no relationship between Dave and his employees.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whole Foods Case Study

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One may ask the question, why do certain individuals enjoy going to work, and performing at 100% while others require constant supervision? McGregor’s theory indicates that management and employees fall under two categories; Theory X or Theory Y. Individuals within the X category dislike work, avoid responsibility, are micromanaged, and enticed to accomplish a task. Individuals within the Y category are contradictory to the behaviors of X. Groups in the Y are highly motived, accomplish their goals, thrive having the responsibility, require no supervision, and enjoy working. They do not view work as a task, but as a natural part of life; therefore, management displaying Y behaviors will assume employees are capable of performing their assigned duties to their best of their abilities while taking pride in their work. Theory Y does not imply participative managers or any other kind of…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I hereby certify that this paper constitutes my own product, that where the language of others is…

    • 10952 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 650

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    whilst these assumptions about staff have aspects that are caricatured or stereotyped there has been a a degree of acceptance that in large, mass production organisations theory X is more relevant, partly because theory Y is difficult to apply. However theory Y is considered to be relevant to organisations where there is a commitment from staff to the organisations objectives. Where staff are able to apply direction and autonomy then they can work better than if they had been carrying out specific directed instuctions.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Theory X/Theory Y” – Douglas McGregor: Mangers act toward subordinates in relation to the views they have of them. Theory X views employees as lazy and motivated by pay. Theory Y views employees as committed and motivated by growth and development. The humanistic approach reflected in Theory Y is more effective in today’s work world.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory X and Y

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Douglas McGregor 's XY Theory, managing an X Theory boss, and William Ouchi 's Theory Z…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management Styles

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A more paternalistic form is also essentially dictatorial. However, decisions take into account the best interests of the employees as well as the business. Communication is again generally downward, but feedback to the management is encouraged to maintain morale. This style can be highly advantageous when it engenders loyalty from the employees, leading to a lower labor turnover, thanks to the emphasis on social needs. On the other hand for an autocratic management style the lack of worker motivation can be typical if no loyal connection is established between the manager and the people who are managed. It shares disadvantages with an autocratic style, such as employees becoming dependent on the leader.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American and Japanese management systems have fundamentally different assumptions about workers. Peters and Waterman suggested that American management systems are based on the assumptions of Scientific Management, while the Japanese approach factors in a hybrid approach that accounts for human, technological and work elements. In terms of McGregor’s Theory X and Y, American management systems have a Theory X approach, while the Japanese management system has a Theory Y approach to workers. Theory X assumes that workers are unwilling to work and are economically motivated, while Theory Y assumes that they are motivated to work and seek rewards other than money.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effects that the style of management will have on the operation of a Quality Circle are vast but it is easy to figure out which styles are best for the productivity of the team. Participative management is the opposite of the autocratic leadership style. It involves all employees in the management process and decision making by having managers set policies to move the group towards consensus and make key decisions based upon the advice and ideas of subordinates. This method provides management with more information from the front line and motivates the workers as they have some control of the decisions. This involves patience on the part of management. The style of management can also effect the encouragement of employees to tell management about obstacles they face in trying to meet quality goals. For example, theory X managers tend to make the employees nervous and stressed, by using threats, fear, and “carrot and stick” methods to achieve performance. Therefore employees are more reluctant to approach the manager about the problems they are having meeting the quality goals. Theory Y managers differ from theory X managers in their social relationship with their subordinates. They use this relationship to satisfy their created desires and to achieve job satisfaction. Theory Y managers make the work of their subordinates rewarding and interesting in such a way that will give them what they want which usually results in their response giving the managers what they need.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays