The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms

Topics: Management, Sociology, Life, Project management, Scientific method, Religion / Pages: 9 (2205 words) / Published: Oct 9th, 1999
WORKS CITED

[1] Cottrol, Robert, ed. Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the

Second Amendment. New York: Garland Publishing Inc., 1994

[2] Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in State Bills of Rights and Judicial

Interpretation. SAF 1993

[3] Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut: Quorum Books,

1989

[4] Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 1991

[5] Kruschke, Earl PHD. Gun Control: A Reference Handbook. California: ABC-CLIO Inc.,

1995

[6] Image on the cover page taken from TIME. Photographer unknown.

[7] Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980)

[8] Zimring, Franklin E., Gun Control. Encyclopedia Encarta: 1993-1997 Microsoft Corporation.

Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals' access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to



Cited: [3] Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut: Quorum Books, 1989 [4] Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 1991 [5] Kruschke, Earl PHD [7] Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980) [8] Zimring, Franklin E., Gun Control A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791) This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Second Amendment: The Right To Bear Arms
  • Second Amendment: The Right To Bear Arms
  • The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms
  • Second Amendment: Our Personal Right To Own And Bear Arms
  • Right to Bear arms
  • The Right to Bear Arms
  • The Right to Bear Arms
  • The Right to Bear Arms
  • Right to Bear Arms
  • Right to Bear Arms