Preview

The Relationship Between Proctor and Elizabeth in The Crucible

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Relationship Between Proctor and Elizabeth in The Crucible
Intro

In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the relationship between Proctor and Elizabeth gradually improves throughout the play. At the beginning they are both extremely separate both physically and mentally. However the relationship in Act two starts to develop as Elizabeth rediscovers her love for him that, in my opinion, has always been there. This then grows even further in Act four when Proctor and Elizabeth’s relationship finally connects and their love is a lot more intense and passionate. By the end of the play both characters learn to forgive each other and are forgiven themselves as well as rediscovering the love they had between themselves they thought they lost.

Act 2
Paragraph 1.

In Act two Miller implies how cold Elizabeth can be towards Proctor. We are shown this when she states...

“Do as you wish, then”

1. Shows she is being extremely blunt.
2. She hasn’t forgiven him yet therefore putting relationship and passion on hold. 3. Feels like Proctor will not listen to her opinion anyways.

We are also shown her cold act towards Proctor in some of the stage directions when Proctor kisses her and she doesn’t kiss him back.

“She receives it”

1. Shows the love isn’t there at the moment(hidden)
2. EP doesn’t kiss him back – powerful message
3. Shows that the affair has make a massive impact( stopped the love) 4. She is still so upset because she loves him.

Paragraph 2

Miller also uses symbolism frequently in Act two to develop the couples’ relationship. We are shown this in the stage directions when Miller shows us Proctors actions.

“Then he lifts out the ladle and tastes. He is not quite pleased” 1. The soup represents the relationship and how it is bland (-he is bored, wants some excitement added).

(LINK) We are then shown Proctor adding some salt to the pot conveying him deducting the boredom away from his relationship.

“He reaches to the cupboard , takes a pinch of salt, and drops it into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I can't believe that awful, no good man, John Proctor. He had the audacity to choose that whining wife over me. I am way better than that goody too shoes Elizabeth Proctor. We have vastly different character traits; we are like day night. She is a naive, simple woman. I on the other hand am an adventurer. I am knowledgeable, healthy, and certainly far from simple. Why, any man would be lucky to have me as their wife. Elizabeth is a old hag who should just disappear. I am a beautiful, young, healthy woman. Yet alas, the man I want so desperately is connected to this evil witch of a woman! I mean can she be anymore annoying? She is always nagging me and everyone else in…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like her husband, Elizabeth has some descriptive terms about her tone; like John Proctor she was bitter during Act II because she has been fooled because of John Proctor's adultery. Then she becomes more compassionate and forgiving because John is on the brink of death in Act III. In the beginning of Act II, Elizabeth is more suspicious of John continuing her sins as she asks” what keeps you so late? It is almost dark”(1266). She was so quick to assume that John Proctor was doing something other than what he was actually doing, providing food for the family. She is a loyal wife that she would go as far as to lie to the court to keep John alive; she does this as he testifies “My husband is a good and righteous man. He is never drunk as some are … but always at his work”(). Although it is a sin this is also a sense of her Redemption because she has forgiven her past adultering husband. And finally in Act IV, when Elizabeth Proctor and John Proctor meet for the last time, she forgives him and blames the unsettled feeling on the household on herself; she goes on to say “John, I counted myself so plain, so poorly made, no honest love could come to me! It were a cold house I kept”(). As John became hysterical, Elizabeth wanted to forgive him and just blames herself in the same manner because she feel so bad and John’s about to die and that leads to try to rectify the situation and the mental pain. Miller perfects the embodiment of a couple who, under all of the issues they have, love each other more than anything in the…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor shifts from cold to forgiving, and Hale starts as orderly and closes as empathetic. Judge Danforth is self-centered and concerned with his reputation throughout the events of the plot. John Hale takes the most drastic change. At first, he gives no thought to the reasons behind the Proctors’ questionable actions and goes to question them anyway, even being suspicious of them himself. By the end of the plot, his view on the couple inverts and he begs them to choose to live. Through the questions, wrongdoings, lies, and pretending, some characters in The Crucible change and improve their relationships, while others do…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the play, Elizabeth has a tense, distant relationship with her husband because he had an affair with Abigail Williams, who is both the Proctors’ antagonist and uses pathos to cause strife between them. Elizabeth still had not been able to forgive John for this, causing their relationship to suffer. However, the accusations brought against them by Abigail force Elizabeth and John to pull together and unite against their accusers. She is able to move past John’s sin when saying, “John, it come to naught that I should forgive you, if you’ll not forgive yourself” (Miller 138). Elizabeth is able to let John know that she does not hold his sin against him anymore, and he should not as well. Elizabeth also changes from being an incredibly truthful person to one that is willing to lie to save her husband. When John is accused, he tells the court that he has committed adultery with Abigail, and this is why Abigail is accusing him. However, the court does not believe him, so John has Elizabeth brought out to prove to the court that her husband did indeed have an affair. Since Elizabeth has never lied before in her life,…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nickel and Dimed

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “What is a self-respecting restaurant cook doing in a flavor-free environment anyway? (65)”- Purpose: To express doubt about Pete’s honesty, she overemphasizes the blandness of the food he serves.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller writes: “She receives it.” Elizabeth does not return the affection; she allows herself to be kissed. This action demonstrates their aloofness and lack of intimacy.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reality Elizabeth Proctor was some 20 years younger than her husband, John Proctor, which wasn’t stated in “The Crucible”. Also, Arthur Miller never declared in his play that Elizabeth was already in worry of being accused as having dealings with witchcraft due to her grandmother, some 30 years earlier, being tried as a witch but truly only had a skill in healing people. In the website “legendsofamerica.com” Kathy Weiser includes that, “She grew up to marry John Proctor, who was some 20 years older than her, on April 1, 1674.” Also, “Elizabeth was at risk of being targeted because her grandmother was Ann Holland Basset Burt, a Quaker and a midwife, who was brought up on charges of witchcraft in 1669.” These two pieces of evidence shows a dramatic difference between Elizabeth Proctor I reality and the Elizabeth Proctor in “The Crucible”. I believe the author left out the fact that Goody Proctor was 20 years younger than John because majority of todays people see the huge age gap in relationships as bad or immoral. As in the fact that Elizabeth’s grandmother was accused of witchcraft 30 years earlier and was also a Quaker, which were felt to be “witchlike”, I believe Miller left tis out of the play for simple reasons as in suspense and it wouldn’t really give the play much creativity. If he would have included this then the…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 2 Elizabeth is arguing with Proctor and confesses some concerns she has about Abigail. “Spoke or silent, a promise is surely made. And she may dote on it now—and I am sure she does—and thinks to kill me then to take my place” (Miller Act 2). Here Elizabeth is warily expressing what she fears Abigail stands to gain by implicating her as witch since she’s realized that Abigail is desperate to get what she wants by any means possible. Abigail is well aware of the amount of sway she holds the trials and aspires to put it in good use. This sense of power overtakes her and makes her want for more, whether that is through accusing more people—just because she can—or removing Elizabeth. But Abigail reasons that once she has removed Abigail from the equation she’s essentially won and gained the highest power of all, being by Proctor’s side. This intense focus on Proctor only serves to push him even further away and pushes her closer to the downfall of losing him and herself in the…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abhishek Shulka once said, “What seems like the right thing to do could also be the hardest thing you have ever done in your life.” These words are often true for many people that have ever had to make a tough decision. Though most will do what is easiest for them the strong willed will do what they believe is right. Strong and independent, Elizabeth proctor always tries to do the right thing, though two compelling desires and obligations pull her mind in conflicting directions; these conflicts add depth to her character and show who she is morally and emotionally.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as his beliefs. This paper will discuss Proctor's change in character and his struggle with getting to…

    • 1926 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth's positive qualities are also her negative ones. She is a virtuous woman who is steadfast and true. These traits also make her a bit of a cold fish. When we first meet her, she's especially cold and fishy. She's got good reason to be, though, because her husband has recently had an affair with their housekeeper, Abigail Williams.…

    • 318 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller shows the audience throughout the play with direct and indirect characterization that John Proctor is eaten by guilt, and that he has things to hide.. Like in act he said, “ ...I should have roared you down when you first told me your suspicion. But I wilted, and like a christian, I confessed!...”(Miller 1164). John Proctor was a angry man who could not let go of his guilt and pride. He could not accept his wife Elizabeth”s forgiveness because he could not forgive himself. The author author also uses indirect characterization to show that John Proctor has skeletons in the closet which the guilt is hanging over him. When Miller says, “ In Proctor’s presence a fool felt his foolishness instantly- and a Proctor is always marked for calumny…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Toklas deigns to step into the kitchen she creates food that make her lover desire her more, not devalue her as subservient. Troung explains the role of salt in enhancing their relationship explained as, “When miss Toklas first visited the rue de Fleurus, she felt Gertrude Stein's “appreciation” on her like a ribbon of steel. She felt her flesh rubbing against it, she felt sweat dripping down her back, sliding down her back, sliding down the side of her thighs. She crossed her legs, and Gertrude Stein looked at her as if she knew, Salt enhances the sweetness. Delicious thought GertrudeStein” (184). Troung is insisting the meaning of salt which came from sweat but in this case, the sweat is not of labor but of love. Truong describes Gertrude Stein thinking, “it is unfathomably erotic that the food she is about to eat has been washed, pared, kneaded, touched, by the hands of her lover” (Truong, 27). Here, food strengthens the relationship between Toklas and Gertrude Stein. It is rarely prepared by one of them, but adds to a long term romantic and sexual relationship that they are afforded. The different identities across relationships mean that the individuals and the relationships they are a part of view salt as a substance that enhances their love for each…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proctor had committed the crime of lechery and adultery with none other than Abigail Williams; before he knew it his goodly life was irrevocably corrupted. Proctor was a sinner, a sinner not only against the moral fashion of the time, but against his own vision of decent conduct. Proctor began to view himself as the thing he hated most – a fraud and a hypocrite. He was caged by his own guilt. The emotional weight of the play rests on Proctors journey to regain his self-image, his lost goodness. It is indeed, Proctors journey from guilt to redemption which forms the central spine of The Crucible.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, the couple, John and Elizabeth Proctor, undergoes a series of complications that only continues to aggravate the already thinly veiled relationship they have. Their strife begins with John Proctor, a stern farmer of good faith, who is only concerned with any matters that either benefit or potentially scar his reputation. John, however, is of good faith only in the faces of the public. He conceals one dark secret to the public; he had an affair with Abigail, who used to be John Proctor’s servant, but was fired seven months ago when John’s wife exhumed the truth. John’s affair had caused great turbulence in his marital relationship with Elizabeth ever since. The couple now has a very unstable relationship because Elizabeth is very skeptical of John, as he has been seeing Abigail lately in Salem, and John is trying to reconcile for his actions. John feels that he is being “judged for lies” by his wife every time he comes back from a trip to Salem, although John is desperately trying to accommodate for his actions such as his endeavors to “please [his wife]” (Miller 52). Elizabeth on the other hand feels that since her husband had already cheated on her once, he could be inclined to do it again. Therefore, Elizabeth can no longer love John the way she used to, and she speaks in a cold and dispassionate manner towards him, making innuendos of John’s sinful act with Abigail. For instance, as John converses with Elizabeth after returning home from Salem, he “gets up, goes to her, [and] kisses her,” but Elizabeth “receives it with a certain disappointment,” which evinces that she is still distraught from the incident seven months ago (Miller 48). As both John and Elizabeth continue to struggle in their fragile relationship, tensions may become worse as Abigail becomes more and more desperate to be with John; she believes that John still has feelings for her and will do whatever it takes to be with him.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics