Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Gene And Cell Therapy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Gene And Cell Therapy
Gene and cell therapy are new treatments for cancer patients. These treatments are easier on the patient than the standard methods that are offered. Although they are experimental and still under clinical trial, they have shown positive results in some patients. This treatment allows patients own bodies to fight the disease for them and not have to worry about reoccurrence. The one thing that needs to be considered when using these types of treatments are if they or not. Gene and cell therapy are not ethical because it breaks the theory of utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism theory states that in order for something to be ethical the output must make the most of the good. Its focus is on creating pleasure while taking away the pain. The goal of this theory is to make as much good in the end that is possible. The viewpoint is “that our actions should be ethically determined by the consequences likely to result from them” (Mepham 31). This states that the outcomes of people’s acts determine if they are ethical or not. The consequences need to produce good, wholesome results.
Gene and cell therapy goes against God. God created humans how He wanted them to be in His own image and likeness. God knows that people
…show more content…
This treatment has not been around long enough to know about any long-term consequences from this type of treatment. These unknown consequences could do more harm than originally thought. Gene therapy changes the genetic code which could lead to unknown mutations or consequences when reproducing. This could do more damage than good for the people undergoing these treatments. These treatments are still clinical trials that need more findings before doctors know how well they will work. These doctors do not know what the outcome are yet, but they have a hypothesis. If the outcomes are bad and hurt the patient and their families, it would violate utilitarianism theory because the bad outweighs the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gene therapy has become a powerful therapeutic approach for many different diseases, including diabetes and cancer. Appropriately, gene therapy using genetic engineering, and gene-delivery systems have been broadly studied. Among scientists, it is a major challenge to engineer effective gene-delivery vectors with less cytotoxicity. Viral vectors, which have been used as gene-delivery carriers, have shown many signs of toxicity and side effects. Therefore, non-viral vectors used for gene delivery has been studied and developed to overcome the physiological obstructions of the viral vectors.…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After researching and looking for different reasons as to why or why not they support the CRISPR system I decided that I only agree to the treatment side rather than the designer baby side. CRISPR gene therapy for people with diseases will be very useful. It will help people live a longer, and happier…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freaks

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Yes because gene therapy may have to be may have to be measurable after a short amount of time and require tissue sampling.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First of all, it was pointed out that the therapy has health risks on the patients. It was discovered that some patients were suffering from side effects and have formed tumours in their bodies because of the rejection of incompatible stem cells to their bodies. Why resort to such therapy that does not only destroy other lives but could also destroy yours? Secondly, it was pointed out that there are strong moral issues against the human embryo. We defined human embryo to be a developing human, so destroying one would mean killing your own kind. There is nothing good about prolonging life when other thousands of ones are destroyed as well. Thirdly, we provided other types of alternatives that are less controversial and are not unethical. These therapies include the adult stem cell, umbilical cord stem cell, and induced pluripotent stem cell. Unlike the human embryonic stem cell therapy, these alternatives do not need to destroy lives. That is why researchers should focus more on developing these therapies for the benefit of the people instead. Lastly, we pointed out a counterargument which is that the therapy may reverse the effect of aging but we also rebutted it in the end by pointing out that there is no over all good consequence in destroying lives. The point we provided is obviously stronger due to the fact that moral…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gene therapy is a technique used to treat or prevent genetic diseases. It involves inserting corrective genes that have been designed in a laboratory, into a patient’s cells, which will then correct the missing or defective gene. To insert the corrective genes into a cell, they will use an adenovirus vector. The viral vector will contain the new DNA, and when introduced into the nucleus, the genetic information should be transcribed just like any other gene (1). They can replace the mutated gene which causes disease, inactivate the mutated gene, or introduce new genes to help fight the disease (2).…

    • 4547 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics, John Harris discusses the concept of Eugenics when it comes to using Gene Therapy. Harris defines Eugenics as adapting to the production of “fine” offspring, or artificially producing offspring to fit certain criteria. He stresses on how this concept should be achieved. His main argument is that we should be in favor of Eugenics when it comes to potentially saving a child from living a potential disabled life. Harris believes that his view is not wrong, but believes that it is a matter of indifference whether we call it Eugenics or not. Harris argues that Gene Therapy is ethically sound, and using Eugenics can save lives. Harris notes problems when discussing the idea of using Eugenics. First, he notes that we do not fully understand the objective of producing “fine children.” Second, we do not understand the definition of “fine” and notes the difference between what an offspring can be, and what an offspring normally is. He poses a question where he argues what the difference between removing and repairing dysfunctions is, compared to using measures to enhance the functions of a potential offspring (Eugenics) He poses a second question where he asks if Gene Therapy in general is morally acceptable.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite rapid scientific progress, many people of the public feel somewhat excluded from the debate surrounding the application of science in new technologies and products. Moreover, as scientific progress becomes increasingly fundamental to society, it is becoming equally difficult to stop it from clashing with long-held ethical values. One common and long standing debate is gene therapy. In 2005, a public survey was conducted to see people’s attitudes towards human gene therapy and while 82% stated that they would accept somatic therapy for major illnesses like heart disease, only 64% supported…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Crispr

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlike religion, children can not simply change their genetics when they come of age. Modifying human embryos determines the physical, and arguably mental, characteristics of the unborn children. By deciding to use CRISPR on a human embryo, a child must accept the predetermined choice made by another human. This process will determine what the child will look, act, and think for the rest of his life. Without an doubt, using CRISPR to modify human genes goes against all the civil liberties that America believes in.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, CRISPR/Cas9 system can invite an unhappy future if people misuse the technology. For example, designer baby. Of course, there are pros of designer baby, like “reducing risk of genetic diseases, getter chance the child will succeed in life, increased life span” (Hanson). It also can be that people are enable of organ transplant, and give birth to children of same-sex couple. On the other hand, there are cons, for instance, end of embryos, making a gap in society, loss of individuality” (Hanson). “making a gap in society” means only rich people can use the technology and control the world. What is most problematic is parents can edit children’s genome as they like. Even if their children, they are not their possession. Parents do not…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    I would like to know more about it whether or gene therapy can have different side effects, and if a person has to be really healthy in order for it to work best or if it will work the same no matter what. I feel that the healthier the person, the more likely gene therapy will work, but then that brings up a problem because if people are healthy they won’t need gene therapy, so gene therapy would then be pointless. This is probably one of my biggest questions at the moment, but I really like this topic and I hope I can learn more about it in the near…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is one of the many benefits that come with genetic manipulation. Some say that scientists are finding new ways to control what traits get passed through heredity. If that is so, scientists can make the traits that carry heritable diseases vanish. If scientists can manipulate DNA to relinquish the formation of certain diseases, they will know what causes that disease. This advancement will not only prevent people from obtaining disease but will also eliminate it in people who already have it. “We will see disease eliminated in the future, or we will witness the creation of new and possibly more dangerous genetic conditions that cannot be cured once they are unleashed”(Tagliaferro 75). Some believe that once technology goes so far it will be an unstoppable, dangerous force. Many think that scientists manipulating DNA is simply too far. “Can we, however, ignore opportunities to improve human health”(Tagliaferro 51). What if no one in the world had cancer, down syndrome, or other disabilities and diseases? People would not oppose research so much if they knew what the outcome would be. People are afraid to take risks; they do not want to put their fate in someone else’s hands. What if those hands cured illness and…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether or not it is ethical to change the genes of a child before they are born, to rid them of a family disease or just simply to be able to pick their traits, has been going on for years now. Every year humans as a whole are getting closer and closer to minimizing the major health concerns, so gene therapy can be done safely. It has been done on people in the past, but very few have received an effective treatment. But this doesn’t mean gene therapy is impossible, it just means more research needs to be done. Gene therapy was first proven possible in humans in 1990 on a four year old girl named Ashanthi, who was suffering from a rare disease. In 1998, author Sharon Begley published her article, “Designer Babies”, where she…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic Engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2014). This was first tested on crops, but scientists have now fathomed the idea of genetically modifying embryos to make the “perfect child.” Thus known as a “designer baby.” This new gene tampering experimentation has raised many questions. The most important being, “is predetermining your child’s genetic makeup unethical?” I believe ethics plays a vital part when deciding how far is too far with genetic engineering. I do not believe it is unethical to use these technologies in certain cases, such as altering cells and DNA to reduce genetic diseases. Relying too heavily on the use of genetic…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discoveries by scientists have found many diseases related to genes, and believe that genetic engineering is a way to decrease and eliminate the chances of inheriting these diseases by altering the embryo. This sounds great right? But how great is it really? Many believe that parents should be given the right to design their own child as their consider it to be a moral obligation so that their child grows up into a better adult. However, growing up in to a good person is not genetic. For example, if an alcoholic adopt their child into a stable and moral family, the child is more likely to grow up as a stable adult than alcoholic – such as the saying ‘children see, children do’ . Altering the embryo is not a moral obligation because it is not possible to change the moral of an unborn child.…

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism as most know view that in order to determining what we should do, we must consider what specific act would produce the best overall consequences. They view the ethical goal is to lead is a life rich in pleasure or happiness both in point of quantity and quality for…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays