Preview

The Evolution Of Bipedalism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
98 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Evolution Of Bipedalism
There are many other arguments for bipedalism. Some Paleoanthropologists have argued that bipedalism, monogamy and the lack of visible estrus were interrelated. Bipedalism favoured males who gathered food for females which contributed towards monogamous behaviour and certainty of the paternity of offspring. Peter Wheeler noted that a bipedal hominin exposes only 7% of its surface to sunlight, whereas quadrupeds expose 20% of their surface. He argued that bipedalism evolved to prevent overheating. Kevin Hunt suggests bipedalism might have evolved as a feeding adaptation as pre-hominins were confined to drier and more open habitats than forests where chimpanzees lived.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the moment humans were created to modern times, they made numerous physical and technological advancements. It started when the Australopithecines began displaying signs of bipedalism, freeing two arms for using tools and carrying food while walking at the same time. This was a significant physical change that the hominid species chose to make, as bipedalism was the gateway to hunting, farming, and harvesting. As time passed, the homo habilis began showing up. Their brain size was on a range between 550 and 687 cubic centimeters, whereas the Australopithecines had a brain size between 350 and 600 cubic centimeters, which meant that the homo habilis' brain capacity grew around 50%. This larger brain capacity led to the experimentation with…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron-Cohen 2002 suggested, in their E-S theory, that male hunters gained an evolutionary advantage systematising over women who were much more empathetic. With their theory they suggested that during stress responses, men tend to be adapted for flight or fight. Where as females normally tend and befriend. Shields 1975 suggested that men and women evolved to have roles that complemented each other, in order for both genders to survive.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over decades, many Americans reject the ideas of evolution and there were many arguments against the theory of human evolution. However, in order to understand how the human developed, we must look at the human evolution. For many centuries, we have been curious about our origins and our human bodies structure. How we got to be the kind of species we are today, such as the way we look; walking upright on two legs, our hands has five fingers, the size of our brain and teeth, and what makes us a unique species. Our animal ancestors have shaped our body structure in many ways, we humans have a lot in common than you might think with apes, reptiles and even fish.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Key innovation in human evolution is the development of bipedalism and gradual increase in size of brains. The evolution might have occurred due to change in climate and environment which lead to reduction and replacement of trees with grasslands. Due to presence of large numbers of trees, it was easier for our ancestors to have quadrupedalism instead of bipedalism, so that they can climb on trees and move from one place to another. But with the decrease in number of trees, requirement for bipedalism increased. In an article by Wayman E. (2012), it has been mentioned that Lucy had the anatomy of bipead. Lucy belongs to Australopithecus afarensis. It is estimated that Lucy lived 3.2 mya. Her pelvis was broad and she has thigh bones which were…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To support the evolutionary perspective, the division of labour was shown to be an advantage. Men were the hunter gathers, breadwinners, while the mother was at home acting as the ‘angel of the house’ and looking after the children. If a women was to hunt, this would reduce the group’s reproductive success, as the woman was the one who was pregnant or producing milk. Although, the women could contribute to the important business of growing food, making clothing and shelter and so on. This enhances reproductive success but it also important in avoiding starvation – an…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sexual selection can be used to explain certain characteristics or behaviours which increase an individual’s reproductive success. These characteristics may get exaggerated over evolutionary time. In humans, these characteristics may include good physical and mental health, as well as physical features such as good looks etc. these characteristics are attractive because they show an ability to reproduce and pass on these genes to offspring. There are two types of sexual selection, intrasexual and intersexual. Intrasexual selection is the evolution of characteristics that enable an individual to compete with their rivals whereas intersexual selection is the evolution of characteristics that are attractive to a mate. An example of this would be a peacock’s tail. The peacock with the ‘best’ tail (longest and brightest etc.) is considered to be more attractive to the peahen and therefore he is more likely to reproduce and pass on his genes to the next generation. Buss, 1989, found evidence to support this. Over 10000 participants across 37 different cultures took part in his study on differences in intersexual selection. Questionnaires were given to the participants, asking about preferences for variables such as marriage, age differences, characteristics etc. He found that women valued qualities such as ambition and industriousness in men – qualities showing their financial potential. He also found that men valued youth and physical attractiveness more highly than women. This suggests that males look for qualities associated with fertility in line with evolutionary predictions. He concluded that women have evolved to select mates who can provide resources for themselves and their offspring. Buss’ study had over 10000 participants and therefore has credibility, however the participants may have not given a truthful answer and instead given one they thought would appear more…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human are classified in the primate order. The primate order contains countless species of prosimians, monkeys, apes, and us. Moreover even though humans are classified along with other primates the nearest relative is chimpanzees. Similarly, humans and chimpanzees share, “anatomy, and genetic material” that has been noted for several years now. By sharing similar traits it is noted as a vital part of human evolution. Human evolution is the development of humans also known as Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens are categorized in the Hominidae family, a family that has shown to ensure increased brain size with complexity and bipedalism. Chimpanzees have undergone many different changes during that resulted in binocular vision, mobile digits without claws but nails, decreasing in sense of smell due to a reduced snout, large and complex brains. Specific traits are illustrated distinctively within humans (Kottak, 2009).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characteristic that separates primates from hominids is bipedalism; means walking in two feet. These characteristics can be seen in the skeletal structures that have different traits that are: the pelvis is vertical, the spine is curved in an S shape and the last trait is that the arms are shorter than the legs.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bipedalism Research Paper

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “On land, tropical forests underwent reduction or, more commonly, broke up into mosaics where patches of forest were interspersed with savanna or other types of open country. With the breaking up of forests, our early ancestors found themselves spending more and more time on the ground and had to adapt to this new open environment.” There are many different theories trying to explain why and how our ancestors came to be bipeds. This quote is stating the theory that our ancestors faced many obvious problems through having to deal with the forest-savanna change. The major problems here are that as forests shrank, we had to move from patch of trees to other patches of trees, but the major problem was food gathering. As trees became scarce,…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bipedalism Hypothesis

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Owen Lovejoy is known in the scientific community for his reconstruction work on Lucy’s remains. He is a functional anatomist at Kent State University. Lovejoy hypothesized that bipedalism may have influenced male provisioning in our species. Walking on two legs meant our bipedal ancestors couldn’t carry their offsprings on their backs the way quadrupedal hominids do; instead, they have to carry their offsprings in their arms until they are weaned. Having full hands meant that their mate must provide food and protection. This probably resulted in monogamous relationships between mates until the offsprings are weaned. Bipedalism might have been the catalyst that transitioned our species from R-reproductive strategist towards K-reproductive strategists. R-reproductive strategy is characterized by large quantity of offsprings, little care for offsprings, fast maturation and short lived. In contrast, K-reproductive strategy is characterized by lower quantity of offsprings, more care for offsprings, longer maturation stage and long lived. Though our evolutionary relatives, the chimps, are facultative bipeds and can carry food in their hands while using biped locomotion for a short period of time, it is very energy consuming. It’s very energy consuming for them because they lacked the pelvic and lower body structure to walk energy efficiently that is present in hominoids with obligated bipedalism. Lovejoy’s hypothesis suggests that bipedalism may have increased offspring survivorship and the species reproductive fitness through by increasing efficiency in male…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based on the lab data and observations of primate locomotion, the main reason I think that children are better at brachiating then adults, is because their bodies are more flexible. For instance, unlike adults, children’s skeletons are not yet fully developed and as a result, many of their bones are still partially cartilage to allow them to grow. This would give children an advantage when performing physical actions like brachiating because it would allow them to stretch their bodies into positions that could otherwise be awkward on the adult skeleton and joints. Moreover, another attribute that would make children more suited to movements like brachiating, is their size. Specifically, young children weigh far less than their adult counterparts…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The greatest achievement and jump in evolutions was mans bipedality, suddenly we were faster, taller, able to bring and eat food for efficiently, it was a marvel. We were mobile, energy efficient, we could migrate and avoid the incredibly harsh weather, it also allowed for bigger brains, which improved out intelligence. Tools were also a great help to Neanderthal men, it made life easier and able to compete with the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Primate Brains

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (2005) provide an overview of the “ecological dominance-social competition” (EDSC) model as an explanation to the unique evolution of human cognitive adaptations and specific traits that make us armed with different sets of skills compared to other species. The article then presents an analysis of some of the major human features and evaluates their compatibility with the EDSC model, relying on the hominin fossil record and human neurobiology and cognition as the main two empirical resources. Flinn et al. begin with presenting different hypotheses that have been explored to explain the evolution of human cognition. According to the authors, many of these hypotheses included ecological problem solving, hunting, a sudden genetic change, sexual selection (female choice hypothesis) and the consideration of the the brain as a “social tool”. All of them encountered limitations in explaining how our hominin ancestors diverged from other species in terms of their cognitive capabilities. For instance, the ecological problem solving and hunting models are not generally accepted since many other species also engage in activities like tool use and scavenging, in addition to the fact they do not account for other aspects that are far from functionality like art and religion. The female choice hypothesis states that females chose to mate only with increasingly intelligent males, which directly acts as a selective pressure within the population towards higher cognitive abilities. However, the lack of sex differences in the overall level of intelligence presents as an unnegligible challenge to this theory (Flinn et al., 2015,…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Paleolithic Era

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Paleolithic Era, also known as the “old stone age” was a time where humans foraged hunted wild animals or gathered edible portions of wild plants. Nothing was stored because people were always on the move. they couldn’t take the extra weight. The Neolithic Era or the “new stone age” refers to a period of time where humans began refining their tools for use on domesticated plants and animals. It was during this time that people began to store dry or wet things in pottery due to the surplus of food that had to be stored. The beginning of the Neolithic Era was the Transition to Agriculture. Neolithic peoples wanted to secure themselves a more stable lifestyle with a sure income of food. Women of this time began to nurture plants and men began…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A distinctive evolutionary feature of humans can be seen by the lack of hair on their bodies as compared to their primate relatives, the apes. Hair is an essential body covering for most mammals. According to The Naked Truth (2010), hair provides a means of insulation, protection, and can be used for camouflage. There are several arguments on why the ancestor’s of humans lost their body hair, which can ultimately be narrowed down to three popular theories. One theory suggested in The Naked Truth (2010) says that humans lost their fur in order to regulate their body temperature as they adapted to a new strenuous way of living. Another theory suggested by Nicholas Wade of New York Times (2003), says that humans lost their fur because of their…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays