Preview

The Elements of Criminal Liability

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Elements of Criminal Liability
The Elements of Criminal Liability

ACTUS REUS & MENS REA

"Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea", or "an act does not make a man guilty unless his mind be also guilty (Burgess, 2004, p.8)." In criminal law, for an individual to commit a crime, there must be present two elements. They are:
• Actus Reus (meaning guilty act – or omission); and
• Mens Rea (meaning guilty mind).

Actus Reus is the guilty act or omission in the commissioning of a crime. In short, it is what the offender does or doesn't do which results in a crime taking place. Mens Rea is the guilty mind behind the crime. It is what tells the offender that what they are doing or not doing is wrong but they do it regardless. An act can be described as an action carried out by the offender in order to commit the crime. On the other hand, an omission is the opposite, where an offender neglects to take action to prevent a crime. To omit something is to leave it out, failure to act (Halsey, 1986, p. 704). For example: Watching someone have a heart attack and no attempting to render assistance or call an ambulance could be classified as an omission. The failure to render assistance or calling an ambulance resulted in the person's death.

These elements can also be described as a physical element and a fault element. The Commonwealth Criminal Code of Australia sets out that the physical elements of an offence must include an element of conduct involving the offender. Conduct may be an act, an omission, a state of affairs or some combination of those elements (AIJA Magistrates' Conference, July 2001, p. 6). The Code also defines five distinct fault elements: intention, knowledge, recklessness, dishonesty and negligence (AIJA Magistrates' Conference, July 2001, p. 6).

Majority of crimes require not only the proof of an action or omission having been perpetrated by the offender but a guilty mind must also be established before a person can be convicted. In other words, the prosecution must prove

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Omission – An Omission is where the Actus Reus is in the form of not doing something, another term is negligence.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a result of Lydia’s actions, Danielle and Gemma have died. Therefore, the extent of Lydia’s criminal liability for their deaths must be explored. Lydia’s culpability for their Murders must be explored before lesser offences of manslaughter can be considered. The majority of law pertaining to Murder is found in the Common Law, rather than being defined in statutes like a great deal of criminal offences. Murder, as defined by Lord Coke, is when a man of “sound memory” at the age of “discretion”, “unlawfully” kills any “reasonable creature” in any “county of the realm”. Prerequisites for murder include that the act take place “under the queen’s peace” with “malice aforethought”.1 This means that the Defendant must not be legally insane, should…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (as shown in the book) Figure 2–1 illustrates the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Criminality exists when the two concur and where no defense, as characterized in the figure, exists. Defenses in this figure refer to the zone of individual liberties over which governments have no authority to regulate and to those instances where other factual or legal defenses free an individual from criminal responsibility. Hence, as discussed in this chapter, the essence of criminal conduct consists of a concurrence of a criminal act with a culpable mental state.” In the case of the shooting of Mayor Crespo, wife Lyvette ‘actus reus’ or the criminal act is the shooting of her husband. ‘Mens rea’ is the wife’s culpable (or responsible) mental state during the incident. A concurrence of the two – actus reus and mens rea is clearly observed in the shooting, and this clearly constitutes as crime. Whatever outcome this may have in the coming days or weeks, I will be one of many spectators who wait for the full story and final decision. One thing is clear; a crime was obviously committed at the night of the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal law often prohibits specific acts. Therefore, the evidence must be reasonably demonstrate actions caused by the suspects. This particular action is called guilty act - Latin: actus reus. Prohibited acts can constituted by an act or an act of intimidation, or in some extreme cases, the non-action as well. For example, parent starved newborn is also a forbidden act. If the offense is a no action as mentioned above, it should be accompanied by a duty. This duty may be due to contracts, voluntary commitment, relationships and sometimes blood vessels due to their assigned positions. Responsibilities also can form if you manually create a dangerous condition. An offense can be defended if the prosecutors could not prove causal link of the offense of the offender for damages caused.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecution in a criminal case need only establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the crime.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Actus Reus: A Latin term, which means the guilty act. Actus Reus means that there must be an action or physical movement.…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Voluntary nature of actus reus , The act or omission must be voluntary on the part of the defendant, if the defendant has no control over his actions the n he has not committed the actus reus. InHill v B…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing Evidence

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence of a statement that inculpates the accused, a number of courts require that statement be against the declarants interest and that there be corroboration. Factors that courts look at for corroboration include motive, general character of the declarant, whether more than one person heard the statement, whether it was made spontaneously and the timing of the declaration and relationship between the declarant and the witness.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The basic requirements for criminal liability is the performance by a person of conduct which includes voluntary act or the omission to perform a duty imposed by law which the person is physically capable of performing.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the exception of strict liability offences for a criminal offence to have occurred, the accused must have committed both elements of the crime:…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – conduct does not make a man guilty without a guilty mind…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actus Reus

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Actus Reus  The physical element of a crime: o An act o An omission (failure to act) o A ‘state of affairs’ Conduct, consequence, circumstances. To complete an offence, mens rea is also needed. Strict liability offences do not require mens rea. A ‘state of affairs’ is an involuntary act: o Larsonneur 1933- D ordered to leave UK; brought back to UK against her will but Irish police. Convicted, despite involuntary act. Actus reus must be proved: o R v Deller 1916- D thought he’d mortgaged car, and so was lying to buyer. Car not mortgaged- mens rea for false pretence but no actus reus. Conduct generally must be voluntary to constitute actus reus. Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea: o Thabo Meli v R 1954- Ds plied V with drink; hit him intending to kill. Pushed V off cliff, where he died from exposure. Privy Council held that entire event was one continuing actus reus. o R v Le Brun 1991- D hit wife intending to injure. Her death actually resulted from D dragging her from the car, where she hit her head on the ground. Manslaughter conviction- two acts part of same sequence despite time gap. o R v Church 1966- D fought V; knocked her unconscious. Assumed she was dead and threw her into river where she drowned. Manslaughter. Omissions Normally, only voluntary acts can constitute actus reus. However, a ‘state of affairs’ can be sufficient for actus reus. Omissions- failing to act. There is only criminal liability for the failure if there was a duty to act; the crime must also be a result crime (e.g. murder). Six different duties. A statutory duty: an act of Parliament can create liability for an omission, e.g. failing to report a road traffic accident. Examples include s.1 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, the Domestic Violence, Crime, and Victims Act 2004 and the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991: o Greener v DPP 1996- D guilty under Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 for failing to take precautions when restraining a dog that escape and bit a child. Common Law Duties: A…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics