As a neurosurgeon, Paul was expected to give his patients their prognosis and possible treatments. The reason that Paul became a neurosurgeon was to find out the meaning of life. This is important because Paul had devoted a large chunk of his life to find out which life was worth living. At first, Paul stated that he wanted to be a writer, not a doctor. In fact, on page 19, Paul states that he wanted to be anything besides a doctor. It was only after he read a book form his old girlfriend that Paul decided to become a neurosurgeon, the book stated that the mind was a fiction of the brain, and Paul wanted to debunk that belief. Deontologically speaking, Paul saw it as his duty to find out what was a good life, and to live that good life. Further proof of this can be found when Paul had to choose between working on a research project, or working as a chef in the Stanford alumni camp. Instead of working on a highly valuable research project, Paul decided to work as a chef in the camp. Both of these choices represent the fundamental conflict in Paul’s life. On one hand, Paul could choose to be a doctor, and learn about mortality from terminally ill patients. On the other, Paul could explore different options for his life. Paul could become a writer, a teacher, or a professor, as he was trying to do later on. Instead, by being a physician, Paul could observe how death changed a person, and explore the vast responses a person would put up against it. Furthermore, after becoming a physician, Paul started to find the good life in treating the neurological disorders within a patient. However, Paul’s attitude soon changes when he is diagnosed with a rare form of lung
As a neurosurgeon, Paul was expected to give his patients their prognosis and possible treatments. The reason that Paul became a neurosurgeon was to find out the meaning of life. This is important because Paul had devoted a large chunk of his life to find out which life was worth living. At first, Paul stated that he wanted to be a writer, not a doctor. In fact, on page 19, Paul states that he wanted to be anything besides a doctor. It was only after he read a book form his old girlfriend that Paul decided to become a neurosurgeon, the book stated that the mind was a fiction of the brain, and Paul wanted to debunk that belief. Deontologically speaking, Paul saw it as his duty to find out what was a good life, and to live that good life. Further proof of this can be found when Paul had to choose between working on a research project, or working as a chef in the Stanford alumni camp. Instead of working on a highly valuable research project, Paul decided to work as a chef in the camp. Both of these choices represent the fundamental conflict in Paul’s life. On one hand, Paul could choose to be a doctor, and learn about mortality from terminally ill patients. On the other, Paul could explore different options for his life. Paul could become a writer, a teacher, or a professor, as he was trying to do later on. Instead, by being a physician, Paul could observe how death changed a person, and explore the vast responses a person would put up against it. Furthermore, after becoming a physician, Paul started to find the good life in treating the neurological disorders within a patient. However, Paul’s attitude soon changes when he is diagnosed with a rare form of lung