Preview

State and Local Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State and Local Government
State and Local Government Paper
POL/215
University of Phoenix
January 15, 2006

Introduction The city of Fountain, Colorado is a full service municipality. Within the city, several actively responsive city boards see to the needs of the community and plan for the city’s future growth. One such board is the City Council, which holds regularly scheduled meetings on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. Each meeting follows the same basic structure and allows for input from local citizens. During the last several council meetings, one of the focal issues has been the possibility of reducing the fifteen-foot non-smoking radius in entryways. The Colorado Clean Indoor Act has a clause that states “smoking is not allowed within 15 feet of an establishment or business main entryway unless defined differently by a local law” (Smoke Free Colorado, 2006). During the December 19, 2006 Fountain City Council meeting, this was a focal topic for the council meeting.
Positions Taken As with most issues, there were citizens and council members on each opposing side of the issue. The majority of the citizens expressed a need to reduce the non-smoking radius. The reasons behind this need were focused on keeping patrons from standing in parking lots to smoke. Several citizens pointed out the fact that many businesses are currently violating the current ordinances in order to keep patrons. Council member Oneyear did not feel that there was any need to reduce the non-smoking radius for any businesses within Fountain city limits. However, the majority of council members agreed with the strong positions provided by citizens and storeowners. Therefore, Mayor Howells made a motion to reduce the non-smoking radius. Another member of the council seconded this motion. Therefore, a new ordinance is going to be read at the next council meeting to reduce the radius from fifteen feet to five feet.
Prior Action The issue of the smoking radius has been



References: Smoke Free Colorado. (2006). Colorado Clean Indoor Act. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.smokefreecolorado.org/theLaw.aspx

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The official ballot summary on Initiative 901 reads, "This measure would prohibit smoking in public places and in places of employment. Current laws allowing designation of certain smoking areas would be repealed, including current provisions allowing designation of an entire restaurant, bar, tavern, bowling alley, skating rink, or tobacco shop as a smoking area. The prohibition would include areas within 25 feet of entrances, exits, opening windows and ventilation intakes, unless shorter distances are approved by the director of the local health department."…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 516 Words
    • 1 Page

    make sure everyone is protected the government. This prevents a tyranny by making people not…

    • 516 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Billingsley has the power to encourage change and write new policies to be effective immediately without any hesitation. While the employee’s are discouraged, they need to acknowledge that they do work for the health department and smoking is considered dangerous to the public. According to the Columbia Encyclopedia “smoking is considered a health hazard because tobacco smoke contains nicotine, a poisonous alkaloid, and other harmful substances such as carbon monoxide, acroleing, ammonia, prussic acid, and a number of aldehydes and tars. (Capella) So the health effects are smoking are really dangerous so smoking on state property should be eliminated immediately as you are representing a healthy lifestyle to the…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people debate over where government intervention is appropriate and personal freedom should begin. One of these highly discussed topics is banning smoking in public places. The ban of smoking in public has many advantages and reasons. Smoking in public puts innocent adults, teenagers, and children at risk of serious health problems. If smoking is banned in public, this may help lower rates of potential smokers and current smokers as well. The welfare of the nonsmoker and the smoker are both affected by allowing smoking in public. By banning smoking in these areas, the population would be positively influenced.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If smoking is allowed in public places then the freedom of the non smoker is taken away. If we don’t allow smoking in public places then the smoker’s freedom is then restricted. Therefore banning smoking is a decision between the health of a whole nation versus the freedom of a minority. Which is more important? The millions of people that die from second hand smoke or the smoker who always has that cup of coffee and a quick smoke during their lunch break. It is not fair that the non smokers choose not to smoke by but in public he or she has no choice when it comes to smoking because of second hand smoke. Therefore the Louisiana Government should ban smoking in public places.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main idea of this article is banning smoking in federal housing units. The goal is to avoid 760,000 children being exposed to secondhand smoke. One of the unspoken goals might be to avoid loss of life and public housing due to fires. People who has asthma or other medical conditions can be worsened by the smell of smoke. The smoke can leave stains on the walls…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    government

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Legislative - The House of Representatives was given more power than the Senate. They borrow and coin money, set up post offices and roads, regulate commerce and immigration, create an environment for good commerce, maintain army, navy, militias, declare war, conduct impeachments, make laws limited to the six purposes in the first 52 words of the constitution, and oversee the District of Columbia. Congress also establishes the jurisdiction of the Court and has the power to impeach judges.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States was founded on economic and political freedom. This freedom enables all our citizens to successfully pursue unlimited opportunities to use their god given talents to work, produce, invest, take risk, and grow wealthy while keeping the prosperous fruits of their enterprise. Here we have state governments that are “laboratories of government” and a notional government that has more autonomy than the state government. The state governments have some type of autonomy but the national government is stronger even if they are not close to those individuals the serve.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My position as an Anti-Federalist is to oppose the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the Constitution of 1787. The Anti-Federalist rejected the term and argued that they were the true Federalists. In both their correspondence and their local groups they tried to capture the term. We the Anti-Federalist were composed of diverse elements, such as those who opposed to the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or people; those that claimed a new centralized, monarchic power that would only replace the cast-off despotism of Great Britain with the proposed government; and those who feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoking is harmful. At least, that is what many people seem to believe. Over the past, a growing number of states and their local governments have enacted laws that restrict or prohibit smoking in bars, restaurants, and other public places. The government in the U.S. seeks to reduce the adverse health effects of smoking, both to smokers and non-smokers. Policies have focused on discouraging smoking through tobacco taxes, restrictions on tobacco advertising, providing services to assist smokers to quit, and taking various steps to inform the community of the health risks associated with smoking. However, the extension of smoking prohibitions to commercial casinos is a new phenomenon, and additional research make significant discoveries not only with regard to smoking but also with regard to how it impacts public areas that are most affected by smoking. This research results in a greater understanding of this issue, and it also provides the chance to be able to answer questions.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    State and federal

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How a society punishes their criminals can say a lot about the way the citizens live their lives. Here in the United States we would rather take better care of someone in prison for life than a person on the street who has never committed a crime in their life.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Punishing a child for behaviors out of their control is not within the realm of reasonable (Osborne & Russo, 2007).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Restaurant goers make decisions that effect their overall satisfaction in an establishment every time they go out. They have to decide if they want their steak cooked medium-well or rare, if they want a Budweiser or a Bud-light, and if they want to start a tab or pay in cash. So what do all these decisions have in common? They have the freedom to choose what they want. So, why is it that we don't have a choice when the decision is whether or not we can smoke in public? You may think this seems like a complaint on the behalf of customers who smokes. But, in fact, it is the complaint of a non-smoker. Non-smokers have no choice in whether they are surrounded by people who smoke or not when they are at a bar or restaurant. Other customers, who…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The impact of tobacco on the environment: Tobacco facts sheet, (2012). Legacy for Longer Health, 1-3. Retrieved from:…

    • 1467 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lambert, T.A., (2006), 'The Case Against Smoking Bans ', Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, Vol.13.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays