Preview

Stanley Milgram Experiment Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram Experiment Essay
In 1963, a Phycologist at Yale University, known as Stanley Milgram, provided one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He conducted an experimentation concentrating on the dispute amongst a response to a direct order from a superior and the internal logic of what is right or wrong in one’s behaviors or motives, compelling towards right action. The principal objective was to see how far a human would go when an authority ordered them to kill an innocent individual. Milgram wanted to be precise if the Germans were complying their superior, a mutual clarification for the Nazi killing in World War II.
In 1963, a Phycologist at Yale University, known as Stanley Milgram, provided one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He conducted an
…show more content…
The principal objective was to see how far a human would go when an authority ordered them to kill an innocent individual. Milgram wanted to be precise if the Germans were complying their superior, a mutual clarification for the Nazi killing in World War II.
In 1961, Phycologist Stanley Milgram began his trial, known as the Milgram experiment, to investigate the obedience to authority figures. The format in which he testified his experiment was by newspaper advertising for males to participate in a study of knowledge at Yale University. He gathered 40 females between the ages 20-50 where they were paid $4.50. At the beginning of the trial, they were introduced to another participant commonly being an ally of the experimenter. They selected a straw whether they would be the learner or the teacher-although the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Aims and Context

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do, even if it had a negative impact on others, which in this case was murdering innocent people, although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked to do and yet still carried out the task.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One experiment, called The Milgram experiment, also raised ethical concern. The experiment consisted of 40 men recruited using newspaper ads. The participants were paid $4.50 for their involvement in the study. Milgram…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it fair to deceive humans in an unethical psychological experiment in order to receive new information? This is a question that I believe needs to be asked when one thinks of the Milgram experiment, a psychological study set up in the U.S in 1965. American psychologist Stanley Milgram held an experiment in order to see how severely ordinary human beings could knowingly cause harm to another human. This idea came about when he studied the holocaust in Germany in WWII, and then in the Nuremberg war trials years later, and gained an understanding that many of the Germans soldiers who participated in the death of many innocent Jews said they only did so because they were ordered by an authority figure. They claimed that they only acted out of…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Did Genocide Happen

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Following the conclusion of World War II in Nazi Germany, the world witnessed the Nuremburg War Criminal Trials, a set of trials against the onlookers of the Holocaust, or Germany’s mass extermination of European Jews. In most of the cases in the trials, the accused often used obedience to plead their cases, claiming that their actions had all come from higher in the Nazi’s hierarchy of government. Researcher Stanley Milgram “devised [an] experiment to answer the question ‘Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them accomplices?’ … The study revealed that two-thirds of the time, the participant was willing to deliver potentially life-threatening shocks to the ‘learner’ simply because they were receiving orders from an authority figure” (Document A and Documentary). Historians baffled the thought that Americans were not capable of killing their own peers, simply because the population was thought of as “superior” and it was claimed to be “impossible for an American to kill a fellow American.” However, Milgram’s experiments confirmed the truth that humans are willing to commit unethical or inhumane acts against other humans if given orders from an authority figure, confirming his suspicions during the Nuremberg Trials, and more specifically, Adolf Eichmann’s claim that he was only following…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do Milgram’s results—particularly the finding that the remoteness of the victim affected the obedience—relate to some aspects of modern warfare?…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Milgram experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram a assistant professor of psychology at Yale. The experiment wanted to show the obedience in people to the authority in others by creating a fake “shocking machine“. Lauren Slater quotes in the book Opening Skinners Box “In Milgrams view, any especially persuasive…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays