Preview

Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1912 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo
Table of Contents Description of the experiment, and information about Zimbardo 2 Method 2 Incidents that took place during the procedure 3 The end of the experiment 6 The conclusion and the criticism of the experiment 6 The Conclusion 6 The Criticism 7 References 8

Description of the experiment, and information about Zimbardo
The Stanford prison experiment was an experiment conducted by a group of researchers and led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. Zimbardo was born in New York City on March 23, 1933. He completed his BA in Brooklyn College with a triple major in sociology, anthropology and psychology in 1954. He got both his M.S. and Ph.D. from Yale University in 1955 and 1959 respectively. Also he was a psychology
…show more content…
According to the shift plan there were 3 guards on duty on every shift but when this event took place guards from other shifts decided to voluntarily work some extra hours in order to restore the calm and quell the uprising. Thereupon they unleashed an attack with fire extinguishers against the prisoners without been supervised by any member of the research group. When things came back to normal prisoner #1037 asked Zimbardo to let him leave and he was given the feeling that he wouldn’t be allowed to leave, although Zimbardo never said that, according to Zimbardo the fact that he was the leader of the revolt and he told the other prisoners that they weren’t allowed to drop the experiment and leave the facility converted the experiment in to a real prison in the prisoners’ mind. After that the guards decided that handling nine prisoners with only three guards on duty on every shift was challenging, so one of them suggested that they should start using psychological tactics to control the prisoners. In order to do so they set up a new cell called “privilege cell” in which the prisoners who weren’t involved in the revolt were put and treated with special rewards, like better quality meals. Although the "privileged" inmates chose not to eat the meal in order to stay uniform …show more content…
Also other critics been made suggest that the experiment lacks of generalization due to diversity of the factors, as the participants were mostly white and middle class males. There is also criticism been made referring to the ecological validity of Zimbardo’s prison experiment stating that even though the members of Zimbardo’s research team and himself did their best to recreate a prison setting, it isn’t possible to mimic in a perfect way the whole range of environmental and situational variables of prison life. Despite some of the criticism, the Stanford Prison Experiment remains an important study in our understanding of how the situation can influence human behavior.

References
(2013, 05). Stanford Prison Experiment. Wikipidedia. Retrieved 05, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
Shuttleworth , M. (2008, 06). Stanford Prison Experiment. Explorable. Retrieved 05, 2013, from http://explorable.com/stanford-prison-experiment
Zimbardo, P. Frequently Asked Questions. Stanford Prison Experiment. Retrieved 05, 2013, from http://www.prisonexp.org/faq.htm
Cherry, K. (2013). The Stanford Prison Experiment. About.com Psychology. Retrieved 05, 2013, from http://psychology.about.com/od/classicpsychologystudies/a/stanford-prison-experiment.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A controversial experiment by Zimbardo (1971) (Spoors et al.) shows how a groups of males were separated into two groups of guards and prisoners in a make shift prison. After six days of a two week experiment it was stopped. The guards became abusive while the prisoners showed signs of emotional disturbance.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Experiment is a study of experimental psychology conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971 on the effects of the prison situation. It was created with students playing the roles of guards and prisoners. It was intended to study the behavior of ordinary people in such a context and effect was to show that this was the situation rather that the personality of the participants who was at the origin of behaviours sometimes opposite the values professed by participants before the start of the study.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment lacked a controlled, independent variable as Zimbardo lost his identity and kept excusing the guards’ behavior. He lost sight of the real purpose of the experiment and treated the boys as subjects rather than humans. This experiment had numerous errors. Obviously, Zimbardo should not have been switching from being a part of the experiment to just observing. In addition, there should have been more psychologists there from the beginning for Zimbardo to discuss with. It should have not taken until Maslach’s visit for someone to realize this experiment has gone extremely wrong. Personally, I thought this experiment was very out of line and should not have happened. Though I always see the value in scientific testing, but the Stanford Prison Experiment went too far. It unnecessarily dehumanized the prisoners. After the first mental breakdown of the prisoners, the experiment should have ended. The Stanford Prison Experiment did help Zimbardo with understanding the incidents at Abu Ghraib, Iraq, but it seems pretty obvious that “power without oversight” can lead to horrendous events, especially when people lack the guidance and…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, Zimbardo conducted an experiment which is known as The Standford Prison Experiment. It took place in the basement of a psychology department, which was constructed to feel like an actual prison, and the participants were paid to either choose the role as a prisoner or guard in attempt to gaining a better understanding of human interaction and its effect on human behavior. Zimbardo predicted that from this experiment that the goodness in people would overcome the evil. However, the results proved otherwise. Though some may disagree with Zimbardo's interpretation of his experiment, it revealed that man's nature is evil because of their environment,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In August of 1971, a group of researchers, headed by Dr. Philip Zimbardo, at Stanford University, set out to learn just how prison affects a person psychologically. The results of this experiment were shocking, to say the least, and led that team of researchers, and many others, to question just how bad the prison systems of America really are. The results of this experiment were far more devastating and shocking than anyone involved had imagined.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Go to the following site:http://www.prisonexp.org/. Click on Begin SlideShow at the bottom of the page. Read through the article and watch the video in entirety.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Zimbardo wrote the Article over “The Stanford Prison Experiment”. He set up an experiment that would test how subjects conformed to roles they were given. He started the experiment by picking out subjects through the newspaper. Zimbardo got seventy-five males interested in completing the experiment. Then the subjects went…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays