Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Spousal Support

Better Essays
1164 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Spousal Support
In North America approximately 50% of all marriages will end in a divorce. Divorce is the dissolution of a marriage that can sometimes lead to one party having to pay spousal support, also known as alimony. Spousal support is an allowance made under a court order to a divorced person by the former spouse (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 2003). In Canada it is a common belief that regardless of the reasons for divorce or separation the man can predictably be expected to pay spousal support. One of the most common grounds for divorce or separation in Canada is the infidelity of a partner. However, many find it hard to justify that a man should pay alimony when the reason for a divorce or separation is due to the infidelity of the wife. This issue can be looked at from both sides, one being that the man should have to pay. Canada has a no-fault system; therefore, alimony is based on need not conduct. If the wife was economically dependent on the husband 's income, then she should be awarded alimony to help her get by as a single person. Also, the standard of living during the marriage can affect the amount of alimony the wife might receive. On the other hand, woman should not be getting spousal support automatically just because they were married. With a no-fault rule in place, there is no deterrent for woman to make a commitment to their marriage, because whether they have cheated or not they could always leave with the possibility of receiving a better income than before. Women have pressed for years to get equal rights but still expect support from their former husband once they divorce. Whether it is considered just or not that men should be paying alimony for a spouse that has committed adultery, under Canadian law it does not matter. The Supreme Court of Canada 's Divorce Act states that "the court shall not make into consideration any misconduct of a spouse in relation to the marriage" (Canadian Press, 2004). This means that no matter how the marriage ended whoever supported the other could end of paying alimony. The court grants alimony to a spouse if they have a need for support, not based on their conduct during the marriage. Spousal support is paid to help with the recipients living expenses as a single person, because there are now two households that need to be paid for instead of one using the same amount of money (Divorce Info, 2005). If a wife was economically dependent on the husband she will most likely be awarded some kind of alimony but the amount and the duration of the alimony depends on various factors. The longer the marriage, the greater the chance that spousal support will be made, because the longer the marriage the stronger the presumption will be that both parties should have an equal standard of living. The difference in income also becomes am issue. The greater the difference between the incomes the greater the chance that spousal support will be made. If the husbands income is substantially larger than the woman 's than he should have to pay alimony, even if she was the one that cheated (John-Paul Boyd, 2006). The man should also pay spousal support if the woman is at an economic disadvantage. Sometimes after a couple has been married for a long period of time one partner can lose skills and opportunities for employment. If a woman has made career sacrifices for her marriage she will have a greater chance of being rewarded alimony (Brenda Cossman, 2006). Lastly, the man should pay alimony if the woman 's earning capacity is reduced because of her health, or other obligations such as child care. People might get the assumption that because men are court ordered to pay spousal support more frequently means that women should automatically get alimony once they get divorced. Alimony is designed to provide the lower-income spouse with money for living expenses (Divorce Info, 2005). If the woman makes an equal amount or more than the man, than he should not have to paying alimony. A party who is self sufficient or capable of being self sufficient at the end of a marriage will usually not be awarded spousal support (John-Paul Boyd, 2006). There are instances when a wife might begin living with another man, also known as cohabitate (NC Family Law, 2002). In a case like this, no alimony should be granted for wife because the party is probably getting enough support from the person they are living with, if not then she would have to try and prove her case. Usually cohabitation by a spouse receiving support is a basis for reduction or termination of alimony. If the wife has the mental and physical ability to work than no alimony should be granted to support her. Otherwise, women could marry with no intension of making the marriage last but end up earning an extra allowance after the divorce, along with her regular income from working. When there are no kids involved the wife would usually have no reason to sacrifice her career for the marriage, therefore she should simply live off her own income like before the marriage. Women have fought for equality in all areas of life, so why must they continue to demand alimony from ex-husbands. If she is making a descent living and no kids are involved than the man should not have to pay spousal support, especially when she broke the marriage with her infidelity. Divorce is always hard, especially when dealing with issues like alimony. What makes it so difficult is that no one could ever understand exactly what went on in a marriage, so to place blame is almost impossible. I believe this is why so many areas, such as Canada and some of the United States, have decided to go with a no-fault divorce act, because nobody except the husband and wife could ever really know who was to blame. The downfall of this is that woman might end up getting rewarded for bad behaviour, such as adultery. I believe that the issue of spousal support could never and will never be solved with black and white law enforcement.

Works Cited

"Alimony". Divorce Info. 9 Oct. 2006 http://www.divorceinfo.com/alimony.htm.

Boyd, John-Paul. "Spousal Support". JP Boyd 's BC Family Law Resource. 9 Oct. 2006 http://bcfamilylawresource.com. Cossman, Brenda. "Cheaters Beware." University of Toronto Faculty of Law. 24 June. 2004. 10 Oct. 2006. www.law.utoronto.ca/visitors_content.asp?item.

"Dictionary of the English Language." The American Heritage®. 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/alimony.

"Dating During Divorce". NC Family Law. 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.ncfamilylaw.com/download/date46.html.

"Supreme Court to hear case on ‘no fault ' divorce." Canadian Press. 28 Sept. 2004 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.canadiancrc.com/articles/.

Cited: "Alimony". Divorce Info. 9 Oct. 2006 http://www.divorceinfo.com/alimony.htm. Boyd, John-Paul. "Spousal Support". JP Boyd 's BC Family Law Resource. 9 Oct. 2006 http://bcfamilylawresource.com. Cossman, Brenda. "Cheaters Beware." University of Toronto Faculty of Law. 24 June. 2004. 10 Oct. 2006. www.law.utoronto.ca/visitors_content.asp?item. "Dictionary of the English Language." The American Heritage®. 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/alimony. "Dating During Divorce". NC Family Law. 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.ncfamilylaw.com/download/date46.html. "Supreme Court to hear case on ‘no fault ' divorce." Canadian Press. 28 Sept. 2004 10 Oct. 2006 http://www.canadiancrc.com/articles/.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Earl Jones Ponzi Scheme

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew, C. B. (2010). Canada update-highlights of major legal news and significant court cases from january 2010 through april 2010. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 16(3), 603-612. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/759759421?accountid=3455…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critically assess the view that an increase in the divorce rate in 1980’s was due to changes in the law. (* - 25 minutes)…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some of the items protected in the Spousal Impoverishment Protection Program are burial funds, vehicles and the couples home. It's very important to help protect a spouse when the other spouse enters long term care because its prevents the other spouse from losing everything. The at home spouse may fear financial devastation from paying the high cost of nursing home care. Medicaid rules have been created to protect certain income and properties for the at home spouse, without affecting the nursing home…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Horin, A. (2012) ‘Judges rarely meet young in parenting disputes, says study’, Sydney Morning Herald, 26 May.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    4. McKie, D, Prentice, B & Reed, P. (1983). Divorce: Law and the Family in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.…

    • 3093 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The AICPA term “spousal equivalent” seems to be open to interpretation. Left to my own senses, I found in an internet search the Free Dictionary version of what a “spousal equivalent” is. According to the definition, a spousal equivalent is “a person (not necessarily a spouse) with whom you cohabit and share a long-term sexual relationship”. This definition leaves a lot to be desired and can be interpreted and misled in many directions. Just because one cohabitates with someone else (regardless of sexual preference), doesn’t necessarily mean that they are having sex. As Dr. Higgs mentioned in this week’s lecture, even married couples that live together don’t necessarily have sex. In addition, what is a long-term relationship? In my twenties, a long-term relationship could have been six months. Now that I’m older, I think that the same term should be measured in years. It sounds to me that by using this ambiguous definition, the AICPA is covering all bases when it comes to protecting the ET Section 101 rule of independence.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fault-Based Divorce

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the United States, divorce laws, in general, provide two basic forms of divorce: fault based and no-fault based. However, even in some jurisdictions whose laws do not require a party to claim fault of their partner, a court may still take into account the behavior of the parties when dividing property, debts, evaluating custody, and support.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of the legalization of divorce in Canada predates that of its colonial overseer, England, where it was only in 1857 that divorce was legislated, mainly on grounds of adultery. Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island respectively enacted divorce laws in 1761, 1791, and 1837, generally on grounds of adultery (Wu & Schimmele, 2009). It was not until 1968 that Canada enacted its first unified Federal Divorce Act, which was followed by the more liberal or no fault act of 1985 and it was mentioned that the sole reason for divorce is marriage breakdown, which is defined as either living apart for at least one year, or committing adultery, or treating the other spouse with physical or mental cruelty. Though divorce rates have not increased recently in Canada, the number of divorced persons is however increasing with…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    argumet essayfinal2

    • 830 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1950, only a few states allowed the no-fault divorce. In this kind of divorce, the divorce would not be issued unless one of the couples committed a sin such as adultery, desertion, brutality, intoxication or some other reason that made it difficult to continue the marriage. “At that time, divorce was relatively uncommon and difficult to get in the United States. Fault was usually required-one of the spouses must have committed a crime or sin that justified the divorce” (Attorneys1). This might go back to the reason where the United States’ people and government use to be connected more to their religion. Then, around 1970, approximately all states allowed the no-fault divorce. Moreover, when the United States society’s laws have changed, the divorce numbers also have been shifted showing an increase in rate…

    • 830 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Last, it will distribute the marital assets between the two parties in an equitable fashion. Equitable does not mean equal, but rather what is deemed by the Family Court to be…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divorce In Canada

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page

    Divorce has become an increasingly common experience in the lives of parents and children. In the 1960s, the divorce rate in Canada quite rated. However, according to Dumas and Peron (1992), in the period of the end of the 1960s and the mid 1980s, the divorce rate grew dramatically, five time increase. Bureau of Review (1990) showed that the number of couples divorcing in Canada was nearly one third of all marriages. In the statistics reported in the 1980s and 1990s, parental divorce in Canada was 262 per 100,000 people (Statistics, Canada, 1997) and there were approximately 74,000 kids became “children of divorce”.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Media on Sexuality

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: Elizabeth Goitein. (1998). When the evidence is the crime. The Yale Law Journal, 107(8), 2667-…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Divorce Across the Lifespan

    • 2598 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Wallerstein, J.S., Lewis, J.M., and Blakeslee, S. (2000). The unexpected legacy of divorce. New York: Hyperion…

    • 2598 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Kerr, Margaret, JoAnn Kurtz, and Olivo Laurence M.Canadian Tort Law. 3rd. Canada: Thomson Reuters, 2009. Print.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, the author examines the ideas of marriage through medieval times, which was rarely focused around love and actually focused more on gaining land or money. Men simply lost payment for ending an engagement while the woman lost social credibility. In this event the man would be sued and forced to verify the women’s virtue, allowing the event of another engagement to occur. This law was then adopted by Canada but with more detailed reasons where the man is able to verify that the woman slept with other men before the engagement, allowing the man to end the engagement. Throughout years this law has since faded during the sexual revolution of the 60s and also social growth in which women no longer require a marriage to be successful. Johnston concludes the article by stating that Canada has since demolished allowing lawsuit to occur due to a “Breach of Promise”…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics