Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Source analysis on "Still Hope"

Good Essays
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Source analysis on "Still Hope"
“Still Hope”
1a) The message of this source is that when Chamberlain flies over to Germany (in 1938) he will hopefully negotiate terms with Hitler to avoid a war breaking out/ postponing the war. We can tell this by the cartoon in which we see Chamberlain flying over to Germany with qualities of “peace:” angel wings (signifying that God is on their side and will help them) and an olive branch (which is normally what white doves hold in their beaks to represent peace). “Still Hope,” indicates that attempts have been made before and failed but that in this negotiation that Chamberlain was travelling to Germany for in 1938, was the Munich Agreement, people had very high hopes for. This was because Hitler promised that if he had part of Czechoslovakia, he would be satisfied and would not start a war which is why it was so important that Chamberlain and the other 3 leaders (apart from Czechoslovakian prime minister) present that they had to negotiate and agree on terms to this “Munich Agreement.” “Still Hope,” could also be interpreted to show that Hitler has not yet demoralised Britain and that the briefcase that Chamberlain is holding, shows determination and the will to get this sorted and dealt with. I think it is significant that he is flying as it puts him in a position that seems more superior. The source would have been less effective if we would have seen him stepping out of an aeroplane because he would not seem as important as an “angel,” or a “dove,” perhaps. The fact that it says Chamberlain is “flying over Germany,” is shown by the chalets, the mountains and the snow below him, which is also significant as it kind of makes him look like he is better than Germany, and can rise above them and prevent Hitler from accomplishing his evil ways.
1b) Germany and the USSR signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939 because it was a Non-Aggression Pact between the two countries that pledged neutrality from either party if the other were attacked by a third party, so they would defend each other if that happened. Hitler’s first plan was to invade Poland and to do this without any interference he had make a Pact with the USSR, to ensure that Stalin would not stop him/attempt to prevent his invasion. It was also a very tactical move by Hitler, as Stalin was unsure for a long time on whether to join Alliance with France and Britain like in WW1 or whether to join sides with Germany to hopefully avoid Germany trying to invade the USSR; however even though Stalin was sure that after the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact they would not get attacked, Germany attacked not even a year later! So the Nazi-Soviet Pact was in completely and utter vain.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 23, 1939, delegates from Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union met and marked the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (likewise called the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact and the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact), which ensured that the two nations would not assault each other. By signing this pact, Germany had protected itself from having to fight a two-front war in the soon-to-begin World War II. Consequently, as a component of a mystery addendum, the Soviet Union was to be granted land, including parts of Poland and the Baltic States. The agreement was broken when Nazi Germany assaulted the Soviet Union under two years after the fact, on June 22, 1941.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    F. Nazi Soviet Pact- Germany and the soviet union agreed not to interfered if the other went to wat…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In August 1939 the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression treaty called the Nazi-Soviet Pact with the Nazis. This pact was signed so that Stalin could keep the Soviet Union out of a war with Germany on the eastern front of Europe. Stalin believed that war with the Nazis was a foregone conclusion. The pact was signed in the hope of pushing this conflict off until 1942. This was not a wise decision. The Nazis had become so confident and powerful with their Blitzkrieg model of warfare that the Soviets would have been more prepared for battle in 1939 rather than 1941. Operation Barbarossa allowed this more formidable Nazi force to smash through the Soviet defences in both the north and south of Russia and the Ukraine.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww2 Collaboration Analysis

    • 3933 Words
    • 16 Pages

    An example of collaboration with the Germans was the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact. Under this 1939 pact the two nations agreed not to attack the other if it were to be in war another country, regardless of who started it. The treaty essentially bought time for both leaders as it allowed them to get what they want without the other interfering. During the first two years of World War II while the Soviets and Nazis were collaborating with each other (before Hitler’s invasion of the SU) the territory of what is now Poland and Ukraine was invaded and split between the two…

    • 3933 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HIST410 final exam 1

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Question 1.1. (TCO 1) Historical research involves four main tasks. Discover refers to the task of: (Points : 4)…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's effects on WW2

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On August 23rd of 1939, Soviet Union ruler Joseph Stalin agreed to sign a non-aggression, or neutrality pact with Adolf Hiter, this prove to have a huge influence on the decisions of the Germans. Part of the non-agression pact was that the Soviets would not come to aid Poland if it was attacked, Stalin agreed. This non-agression pact insured Germany that it would not be fighting on two fronts in the coming war, for signing this pact the Soviet Union was given land that included part of Poland and some Baltic States[1]. Just a couple days before the non-agression pact was signed, Vyacheslav Molotov, the Chairman of the Council of People's in the Soviet Union made an economic agreement with the Germans, agreeing to provide food products and raw materials to Germany in exchange for machinery from Germany, this in combination with the non-agression pact helped Germany bypass the British blockade. These pacts were supposed to last ten years, they only lasted two.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the end of World War II, there was a war between two groups of nations. The Soviet Union and the Axis powers. The Soviet Union was mainly consisted of the United States,Britain,France,and Russia which had democratic republic goverment system. Then the Axis power consisted Germany,Italy,and Japan which was based on dictatorship. After the Axis powers invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 the United States started to view the soviet Union as an embattled country being overrun by Axis powers,and was further reinforced in the aftermath of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline of Wwii

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages

    August 23, 1939 - Germany and Russia agreed not to attack each other, which allowed Hitler to open up a second front in the West without worrying about defending against Russia. Granted Western Poland ot Germany, but allowed Russia to occupy Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Eastern Poland. Hitler intended to break the pact.…

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women's Role In Ww2

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1940 on September- Germany, Japan, and Italy sign a pact called the Tripartite Pact and create the Axis Alliance.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This caused Russia to change positions and join the Allies, even though Russia’s leader Joseph Stalin was very distrustful of the United States and Great Britain partially because they had refused to open a second front against the Nazis. Shortly after the end of World War II, conflict tension arose between Russia and the other allies as each had differing ideas as to how the German borders should be redrawn, they also disagreed on how the establishment and maintenance of post-war security should be run. At the Potsdam Conference in July of 1945 the Allies finally came to an agreement deciding to split Germany into four occupation zones with the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union each controlling one. The agreement also stated that Germany’s reparations would be decided by the county that controlled the individual zone. By the time of the Potsdam Conference Russia had already joined with the surrounding countries in Eastern Europe, dominating the countries the Red Army had previously pushed back the Nazis in, creating what Churchill called “The Iron Curtain”.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In retaliation Britain and France declared war on Germany. Russia and The United States were late to join the war for different reason. The Soviet Union and Germany signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. It was a non- aggression pact which meant that the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany would remain neutral in the event that either nation were attacked by a third party. This treaty remained in…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays