Preview

Separation Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
967 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Separation Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo
Phaedo, written by Plato is the interpreted dialogues between Socrates, a major philosopher, as well as some others including Cebes, Simmias, and Echerates. The overall idea of the book is Socrates trying to convince his colleagues of his theories, which explains the fundamental argument that the soul is immortal. Since Socrates is introducing such unheard of ideas, and seeming to be challenging beliefs, he is sentenced to death. While awaiting his fate, Socrates asks only one thing of his colleagues, which is to share his theories. Some of his theories are easily accepted; while others require deeper explanation in order fully convince Socrates’ colleagues.
A true philosopher does not fear death, instead, they welcome it. The main goal is to become as close to death as possible because they feel that this is the only way to gain true wisdom. The soul and the body are considered to be separate from each other. The body is also thought to get in the way of the soul, making it harder to become separate due to the needs of the body such as pleasure. The more one ignores the needs of the body, the closer one is to the separation of the body and soul.
Socrates’ fundamental argument that the soul is immortal is supported by
…show more content…
It is very important to live properly and do good in life because the effects of a person's actions will follow the soul through eternity no matter what form it takes. Simmias and Cebes both are convinced and agree with Socrates’ argument that the soul is immortal. Although they did valid arguments against Socrates, he is able to further explain his reasons for the theories and convinces them. They most likely had originally had doubt about the theory because it was a new idea, something that no one had challenged

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 2 Ancient Greece

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates was the original philosopher. Socrates dies from headlock, he had the choice to live a lonely life with food and water or to take the poison and he picked the headlock, because He believed the search for truth would lead to proper conduct. “The unexamined life is not worth living”, that was the quote that Socrates believed by saying that the purpose of life was personal and spiritual growth. Considered the nature of beauty, knowledge and what is right. His method was to ask questions, to try to expose the flaws in his fellow Athenians' preconceived notions. Socrates went on to teach Plato, the next great Athenian philosopher.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simmias’ objection basically challenges Socrates’ claim that the soul is immortal. Simmias inquires why the soul is not similar to a lyre and its harmony, the soul representing the harmony, and the body representing the lyre. Simmias points out the fact that when a lyre becomes old, the harmony suffers, and eventually ceases to exist (Phaedo, 82a). He claims this occurrence to be the same relationship as between the soul and the body. Socrates, however, is quick to prove Simmias incorrect. Socrates’ first claim is that the soul possesses knowledge at birth, and therefore the soul only recollects what is previously known. Simmias and…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is an impulse to fear death which exists due to the incessant involvement of religious ideas of damnation throughout time. Per Lucretius, this fear of death is completely theoretical, and is overall completely invalid; he argues that there is nothing after death, therefore, people have no reason to fear it. It is important to note not how he counters religion, but how he bases it upon his own ideas of atomism. Lucretius argues that the whole of the human body, mind and physique, are created from specific kinds of atoms. A principle idea of atomism is that the atoms people are comprised of provide the basis for the human senses, such as taste, smell, touch, etc.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Apology: A Defense of Socrates was assumed to serve as Socrates’ trial for his being a fink and shady practices with the youth. Socrates safeguarded himself in a way that he was solely operating assistance to the god that claimed that he was more knowledgeable than everyone else. This defiance didn’t function, and he didn’t win the trial. Socrates continued defending during the ruling allocation of the trial, which lead to him being condemned to death, and aforesaid he was compelled to display his state or condition of being subject to death. Socrates looked at death as not being a dreadful. The information in this paper will clarify how Socrates developed that theory and display why this development is not true.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates in essence, believes in god and is too wise for his own good. Throughout whole trial he spoke nothing but the truth however, because of the greed and jealousy of men they convicted him other wise simply because of their own intentions. Furthermore, searching for the truth couldn't be possible because of the reality of the situation: Socrates was considered the wisest man, people in an act of evil wanted to confront and destroy him and in essence, this couldn't be possible because in fact Socrates was the wisest man and was unknowing of it. This in reality represents the irony in the situation because Socrates doesn't consider himself to be the wisest man in Greece, but he is. In reality Socrates only escape from death was to lie and he didn't feel obliged to do so. In fact the truth was there the whole time and it was up to the people to pry through the illusion of this situation and understand what Socrates was saying. This represents the high cost of searching out the truth in this case, which was the causing of Socrates'…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    helloham

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Socrates describes his views about the nature of Truth and knowledge. his view of his duties; the nature of his courage (why a good man need not fear death…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' Apology

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though this reading is old it still carries great value and importance because it shows that knowledge as Socrates argues is not ours but it belongs to God. Hence, Socrates’ work will continue even after his death “For the word which I will speak is not mine.” It reminds me of Jesus Christ, which story is similar to Socrates’. They both followed a divined forced rather than their own interests and hence both didn’t have a sign of this divine force until the very end. However, their end, death, might seem a negative end to others but the opposite was for both Socrates’ and Jesus’ point of view. Furthermore, their deaths didn’t stop the work they were doing and were accused of but it rather intensified it, making other to seek same path or belief.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato, who was a pupil of Socrates and a famous philosopher, represents the four dialogues during the time from the beginnings of Socrates' trial in Athens to the day of his execution. Also he examines themes regarding of the essence of existence, the nature of death, and the value of wisdom. The first dialogue is a "Euthyphro," which is the name of the first citizen who involves Socrates in dialogue. The two men encounter one another outside the Athenian version of the law courts, where Socrates is about to go on trial for corrupting the youth of the city and Euthyphro is about to bring charges of murder against his father. The two men discussion the natures of both piety and justice. Their conversation ending when Socrates proves to Euthyphro that his (Euthyphro's) actions are not what he believes them to be, and Euthyphro leaves in confusion.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus Vs Plato

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Phaedo is a dialogue depicting the death of Socrates, who was imprisoned for corrupting the minds of…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays