Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Schenck V. United States

Satisfactory Essays
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Schenck V. United States
Legal Brief
10/24/11

Citation: Charles T. Schenck v. United States, Supreme Court of the United States, 1919
Issue: Whether distributing anti-conscription literature during war time is protected under the First Amendment.
Relief Sought: Schenck did not want to be convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 so he appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Facts: Charles Schenck was the general secretary of the Socialist Party of America. Socialists believed that the war had been caused by and would benefit only the rich, while causing suffering and death for the thousands of poor and working-class soldiers who would do the actual fighting in Europe. Party officials not only opposed the war, they urged American workers to oppose the war as well.
Schenck participated in many antiwar activities in violation of the Espionage Act, including mailed letters to draftees that suggested that the draft was a bad idea that was motivated by the capitalist system. The letters urged "Do not submit to intimidation" but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act.
He was arrested and charged with “causing and attempting to cause insubordination in the military and naval forces of the United States” and with disturbing the draft.
Holding of the Court: Schenck’s criticism of the draft was not protected by the First Amendment, because it created a danger to the enlistment and recruiting practices of the U.S. armed forces during a state of war.
Reasoning: Schenck thought the the Espionage Act was unconstitutional and that the Socialist party were persecuted for opposing what they felt was an “immoral war.” The 1st Amendment was specifically included in the Constitution to protect political speech, and to prevent a tyranny The 1st Amendment protections would be meaningless if Congress could choose where and when citizen'
The United States believed that a nation at war is justified in taking steps to in order to defend itself. The case involved a congressional draft policy, not the 1st Amendment. The actions and words of the Socialist party were a danger to the nation. The Espionage and Sedition acts, by contrast, were legitimate and appropriate in a time of war.
Holmes, speaking for a unanimous Court, concluded that Schenck is not protected is not protected by the first amendment in this situation. The character of every act depends on the circumstances. During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished.
Dissenting Opinions: No dissenting opinion
Legal Term: Espionage- the act or practice of spying. capitalist system- an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.
Implications: The Schenck case stands as the first significant investigation of the limits of 1st Amendment free speech provisions by the Supreme Court. Its clarifications on the meaning of free speech have been modified, rewritten, and extended over the years. Flowing directly from this case, two schools of legal thought on the protections of the Bill of Rights emerged. One group felt that the Constitution meant to tolerate no interference by government with the people's freedoms absolutely none.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    President of that time, Woodrow Wilson, wanted the United States to stay neutral and out of the war. He was afraid that getting involved with the war would get people, from different nations in USA, go against each other. In many of his speeches, President Woodrow Wilson told people, that the choice of…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was labeled a "draft dodger" and was fined, sentenced to jail time, and stripped of his…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question #2 Were there any groups or persons that were against the inclusion of this amendment (or any part of it)? Who were they and why did they not support it?…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case Yates v. United States was asking if the Smith Act was a violation of the First Amendment. Fourteen leaders of the Communist Party were sent to court for violating the Smith act. Yates argued that he was protected by the First Amendment. The Smith act was made to set criminal penalties for planning the overthrow of the government. The dissent was Yates had the protection of the First Amendment. The outcome of Yates v. United States was not constitutional because the Supreme Court had already ruled the Smith Act did not violate the First Amendment.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Eugene V. Debs: The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 reflected fears about Germans and antiwar Americans. Kingpin Socialist Eugene V. Debs was convicted under the Espionage Act and sentenced to jail for ten years.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my paper, I am going to be arguing how the Federalists preserve the liberties of the people. The federalists wanted a stronger national government. They felt that establishing a larger national government was necessary to create a more perfect union. The federalists wanted to create relationships with the states and wanted the states to trust them. The federalists also claimed that a strong national government would preserve the liberties of the people the best.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?…

    • 250 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shenkley V. Tabuena

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Defendant Mark Schenkly detained Mr. Flynn in an unreasonable manner because he poked him in the back with a bat, called him names, and denied him access to water and to his phone.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Pearl Harbor was an act of war and we had every right to retaliate using whatever force necessary.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dereliction of Dutys

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Any person serving in the Armed Forces of America, is guilty of violating this article if they, through any means that can be prevented, disobey any order given by a superior, as long as that order is not itself illegal.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court keyed the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech, under the first amendment. In finalizing the conviction of a man accused with disturbing the peace by handing out provocative flyers to draftees of the war, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that in certain ways, words can create a “clear and present danger” in a way that Congress may constitutionally disallow. While the decision has since been overturned, Schenck is still a major point in creating context-based balancing tests used in reviewing Freedom of Speech challenges.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ali refused to be drafted into the military on June 20, 1967. He was convicted due to his refusal This caused Ali to be sentenced to five years in prison and with a fine of $10,000, Ali was also banned from boxing for three years.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The realty firm is correct. The court’s ruling in Schenck v. United States (1919) is in favor of the realty firm because placing "For Sale" or "Sold" signs in front of homes in racially changing neighborhoods does not creates "a clear-and-present-danger test of illegal acts". To go from the signs to a danger for the community takes a lot of deductions, which renders the initial act irrelevant to the eventual danger. The sign is a form of speech which is protected by the First Amendment. The ordinance also interfere with the firm's business, a fact that might lead to a lower revenue and lower employee's salary. Moreover, the citizens should have a right to be informed of their neighborhoods and to decide their changing of…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Haines JLC 101 Prof. Edelson 9/11/14 Hawkins v McGee case brief Case Name: Hawkins v. McGee, 84 N.H. 114, 146 A. 641.(1929) Facts: Mr. Hawkins, the Plaintiff had undergone reconstructive surgery by Dr. McGee,the defendant, in order to remove scar tissue on his hand that had resulted from an electrical wire accident nine years prior to the transaction. The procedure called for the removal of the scar tissue from his palm and the grafting of skin from his chest in its place. When asked about how long the procedure would take, the plaintiff claims the defendant replied “ Three or four days, not over four;then the boy will go home and it will be just a few days when he will go back to work with a good hand”. On top of this assumed promise of a successful procedure, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant had repeatedly talked to the defendant’s father about the opportunity of “experimenting with skin grafting”. The plaintiff agreed to the procedure, but it was unsuccessful.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Here he had his brief case. When he was on the subway, so was an agent, and this agent stole his brief case when Himerick had fallen asleep. In that brief case was 200 documents containing what the Germans had planned on buying. After this, Tom T. decided that the only way to get information was to illegally tap into the phone lines. During this time, President Wilson did not deal with this much; for over 2 years he wanted to keep the public calm. Wilson also wasn’t convinced until a chief aid brought the situation to his attention saying something had to be done. Wilson’s final straw was when the Germans had a plot to arm Mexico and put United States into a war against Mexico. On Flag Day 1917, Wilson explained that he never expected our friends to do this and it was time to go to war. The German ambassador was then…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays