Story assignment
ENG3U1
Teacher: Ms Lopes
Period: 3
Date: 20th September, 2012
North Albion C.I.
By: Sehab Shaikh Guilty or not guilty? A person who sacrificed lives of fifteen officers including him and saved five lives, should he be condemned? Lieutenant-Commander Oram and his crew of nineteen soldiers are under threat of losing their lives as there submarine has got a blast and they have air only enough for two days in submarine. As an in charge officer it is Oram’s call what to do. He decides to save five married officers over other fifteen unmarried ones. Is it a well justified act? Is saving those five men only worth? Statistically fifteen people are dying is better than twenty people are dying all together. But morally it was different for Lieutenant Oram. He had to make a call to save as many lives as possible. He had to hold his nerves to make a right call. There was no chance he could save all of them. “We have enough air for two days. (Bruce & Pg#83)”-Because of lack of air supply he had to make decision faster. He did make decision to let married men live. He sacrificed lives of other fifteen officers including him and showed his bravery which was very well justified decision according to the situation. One would think why Lieutenant Oram only chose to poison unmarried officers? Why didn’t they have right to live? As Oram gets the track of the situation he asks Lieutenant Paull, “Send the five married man to me”. The reason why he preferred to go to choose to save lives of married officers was because in those war time women were completely dependent on their husbands for almost every important tasks like earning money, feeding the family, etc. So, if there husband would die his family would be completely broken. Let’s say every five soldier having family of at least four (husband-wife & children) so it is five times four equals to twenty. He preferred to save those twenty lives over those fifteen which apparently wasn’t an easy decision for him. Therefore, one shouldn’t say that he killed fifteen officers. He saved twenty precious lives. He is not guilty because he didn’t have any bad intensions behind this. If one has to kill life of people who are already going to die to save few precious lives, it shouldn’t be considered as an act of guilt.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The first reason the narrator should forgive himself is, his guilt is making him put all the blame on his shoulders here is a passage from “The Moral logic of Guilt” that reinforces my claim, “Pulaski had saved Bonenberger’s life twice on one day, but when Pulaski needed help, Bonenberger couldn’t be there for him: “When he was in trouble, he was alone,” Captain Bonenberger said. “When we were in trouble, he was there for us. I know it’s not rational or reasonable. There’s nothing logical about it. But I feel responsible.”(Sherman p2). This quote clearly states the guilt people fell for no reason.…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Here's a news flash: No soldier gives his life. That's not the way it works. Most soldiers who make a conscious decision to place themselves in harm's way do it to protect their buddies. They do it because of the bonds of friendship - and it goes so much deeper than friendship.…
- 65 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Throughout our lifetime we face ethical dilemmas, and in this fictional ethical dilemma the main character must decide if he’s willing obey his superior or go against his superior because he views his superior has the wrong viewpoint. The main character is Robert Jackson, and he works in his local police department. The ethical dilemma is that Officer Jackson must decide if it’s morally right to target areas, which wealthy retirees tend to live in, with tickets. His boss tries to justify it by showing how the money will benefit the community as a whole.…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Marriage for a Femme Fatale is not a promise of love, romance and connection but rather one of unhappiness and darkness. In this film the family home is just a location to which displeasure thrives, and where Mr. Dietrichson hardly notices his wife both mentally and physically. In many noir films marriage life is almost sadistic, in Double indemnity it is clear that marriage and sexuality contrast each other, and that death and pleasure are the same thing. Another aspect of femme Fatale marriages in film noir is the nonexistence of children. In some circumstances the husband of the femme fatale is much older meaning that he may have an older child from his previous marriage, for example Mr.Dietrichson has a daughter Lola (Jean Heather). Phyllis…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This in no way is a good for mankind in general. Torturing another being of your kind is an absolute anarchy! The right versus right dilemma in this case is truth versus loyalty. The soldiers involved in the torturing may not all want to be involved in the acts, and possibly got the information from the suspect and wants to report it. However, if majority of the troops wanted to do torturing acts, high ranking officers wanted to, would you say no? Peer pressure has been the most influential stimulant for centuries. Battling alongside the group of men and women for months, sometimes for years, loyalty and bonds are formed. This is an ethical dilemma that I find really boggling. The resolution I would use in this dilemma would be the Care-based model. "Do onto others, as you would want done to you" is a saying parents have been using for years, could they be more true? If they were in another country and were captured, I highly doubt they'd give up information and secrets about military or government plans. If that occurred, he would be looked upon as a traitor. The government needs to stick to human rights principles and stick by the book in imprisonment…
- 1313 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
I would love to be on the officer team because high school is all about trying new things and having new experiences and I would love to try this and if I fall in love with the job maybe I'll aim higher than chapter officer. Being on this team would mean the world to me, I've heard so many great things about being on the team and that's honestly what made me want to join.…
- 128 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Life in the armed forces is filled with crucial, split-second decisions that must be made. Some of the decisions ask these men to take the life of a dangerous individual in order to ensure the safety of countless civilians. In this case many see this Homicide as Justifiable, however, others believe that nothing can justify a homicide and that a situation can always be resolved with non-lethal methods. When it comes to dangerous military targets, this position is naive as these people would not need to be eliminated if they were willing to reason and felt sorry for their crimes. These service men don't take another life for their own personal enjoyment or gain, but they do it because it is their duty to protect. Justifiable homicide is certainly justifiable when it is used justly to protect others from those who would use it unjustly.…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I do believe this is unethical as a police officer. It may be simplistic for the tow truck driver and he may not see anything wrong with it. I believe that it would be unethical because I believe it would be a misuse of the officers’ time. Not to mention that one-hundred-dollar payout for a “finder’s fee” or whatever it is.…
- 209 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Looking back on my eleven years of being a Memphis police officer, there has been several times in which I have been faced with an ethical dilemma. A police officer can encounter these types dilemmas on a daily basis. I remember one of the first ethical issues I faced, was during my probationary phase. We had been dispatched to a one car accident. The dispatcher advised the complaint was a motorist who observed a vehicle severe off the road hit a guardrail and split a pole. My partner who had relinquished all his duties that night because he had a rookie riding with him. Once we made it to the scene, the only thing left was twisted vehicle, a heavily damaged guardrail, and a split concrete pole. My partner, the paramedics, and I spent about fifteen to twenty minutes searching the area for someone who may have been thrown from the vehicle. We were in the area for a few minutes when one of…
- 973 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Like I just mentioned, unfaithfulness is a huge problem that we are adding to this even bigger problem. Another big problem is that not enough people are donating. People can donate their times and talents to help. People who are financially unstable, and alone, who join the military are adding to this problem too. They are going away because they have nobody else, and maybe they are going because they do not think that they are coming, but the chances are that they will probably come back alive. When they do come back, they will be alone once again, and have nobody to live with. Because of that, they might end up homeless, even though they might not know that when they are joining the military. Recruiters could also be adding to this problem.…
- 212 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Section I Applicable Policies (para 1, part V, MCM) 3–1. General This chapter implements and amplifies Article 15, UCMJ, and part V, MCM. No action should be taken under the authority of Article 15, UCMJ, without referring to the appropriate provisions of the MCM and this chapter. This chapter prescribes requirements, policies, limitations, and procedures for— a. Commanders at all levels imposing nonjudicial punishment. b. Members on whom this punishment is to be imposed. c. Other persons who may take some action with respect to the proceedings. 3–2. Use of nonjudicial punishment A commander should use nonpunitive measures to the fullest extent to further the efficiency of the command before resorting to nonjudicial punishment (para 1d(1), part V, MCM). Use of nonjudicial punishment is proper in all cases involving minor offenses in which nonpunitive measures are considered inadequate or inappropriate. If it is clear that nonjudicial punishment will not be sufficient to meet the ends of justice, more stringent measures must be taken. Prompt action is essential for nonjudicial punishment to have the proper corrective effect. Nonjudicial punishment may be imposed to— a. Correct, educate, and reform offenders who the imposing commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures. b. Preserve a soldier’s record of service from unnecessary stigma by record of court-martial conviction. c. Further military efficiency by disposing of minor offenses in a manner requiring less time and personnel than trial by court-martial. 3–3. Relationship of nonjudicial punishment to nonpunitive measures (para 1g, part V, MCM) a. General. Nonjudicial punishment is imposed to correct misconduct in violation of the UCMJ. Such conduct may result from intentional disregard of or failure to comply with prescribed standards of military conduct. Nonpunitive measures usually deal with misconduct resulting from simple neglect, forgetfulness, laziness,…
- 16870 Words
- 68 Pages
Good Essays -
Law is a topic mentioned when we talk about illegal activity and the things that were not able to legally do as citizen of the United States. When we end up breaking the law up, we are innocent before proven guilty. This all happens within the court system. This is where they find out whether you’re guilty or not, so I felt that this would be a great place to do my project. I’m able to get more knowledge about the law and the people around me. Some of the things that you see in court can be astonishing to some individuals and sad to others. Most cases in court relate to minor crimes or civil disputes, but the case that I decided to attend was a homicide case. It ended up being a lot more interesting than the things I’m used to seeing in court. With a case like this the jury proves whether the defendant was guilty, so upon arrival various people were adequately hearing both sides of the story, so in the end they’re able to make a decision on whether he/she is guilty. I enjoyed this project because it opened up my eyes to the law and the…
- 1258 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On December 23, 2011, firefighter James Rice passed away while battling a three-alarm fire. It has been said that his cause of death was due to breathing in “toxic fumes”, while he was wearing a breathing mask. We are still waiting for the state medical examiner to release the final report on how Rice passed away. Though we are unsure of his death it has been confirmed that an electrical problem sparked the blaze. Residents at the scene said a malfunctioning fuse on the second-floor bedroom started the fire. The building was equipped with working fire alarm system, smoke alarms, heat detectors, and carbon monoxide alarms but did not a sprinkler system within their facility. According to investigators they were not required when the building was built but would be if were built as of today. There are also no outstanding code violations for this facility. It seems as if the sprinklers were present they would have played a major role in this investigation. The sprinklers would of course help with the control of the fire as well as the “toxic fumes.” Also if his Personal Protective Equipment and S.B.C.A. was checked and up to date, according to the press, Rice wouldn’t have passed from the “toxic fumes.” The amount of time Rice spent breathing in the “toxic fumes” could have been limited for our veteran. It is still hard to determine what exactly could have been done to help prevent this tragic event from happening since we still don’t have the full story. As per the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducts a review for each firefighter line of duty death to see if there are lessons that can be learned to improve workplace safety, according to the press…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When I was assisting the United Services Organization (USO) in Hampton Roads Virginia, there was a soldier in need of a car. She had received orders a permanent change of station (PCS) move to Fort Lewis in Washington state. She was adamant about buying a new BMW X5 SUV, at a price point well out side her pay grade. Even though she did not posses the budget to support the monthly car note or maintenance fees associated with the luxury brand. Burdened also with abysmal credit score, suspended license and no one willing to co-sign the vehicle loan. As time grew closer to her PCS date, she was was unable to find anyone willing to assist her eventually asking an abusive ex-boyfriend. He seized the opportunity for a chance to produce a degrading sex video in exchange for co-signage.…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
As Mill states, “ Only consequences matter and intention means nothing when determining the value of an act.” Which leads me to when, Bentham believes that pleasure and pain motivates everything we do. In Bentham’s case we would receive great pain by not doing anything, but we see it as pleasure if we get our hands dirty to save any lives, we could, because if it were not up to Jim they all would have been dead. Mill’s believes that we all all driven by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. That being said, an immoral action of Utilitarianism is one that creates more pain, which in this case the action of Jim not killing one man, but because he didn’t kill on man the soldiers kill all twenty people which generates more pain for the action. If Jim chooses not to kill one person in order to save the rest, the consequences are that they will all will be murdered. All in all, the morally optimal action Jim should do would be to kill one man, and save the other nineteen because it generates more pleasure for the greater…
- 1090 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays