Studies have shown that the reliance on the SAT’s favor wealthy white people over other applicants. If SAT’s became optional, the number of black people admitted would rise from 8.3 percent to 11.3 percent (Jaschik). The Latino percentage would go from 7.9 to 10.6 (Jaschik). Not only does it discriminate against minorities, it also discriminates against poor people. Data shows that poorer people test lower than wealthier people. Some say it could be because they do not have the money to afford the help of a tutor or books (Lobosco). Some of the less fortunate may not be able to take the test because it is too costly. Therefore, there are not a lot of people from poorer families or minorities in college because they get judged by a test score rather than their work ethic or grades in
Studies have shown that the reliance on the SAT’s favor wealthy white people over other applicants. If SAT’s became optional, the number of black people admitted would rise from 8.3 percent to 11.3 percent (Jaschik). The Latino percentage would go from 7.9 to 10.6 (Jaschik). Not only does it discriminate against minorities, it also discriminates against poor people. Data shows that poorer people test lower than wealthier people. Some say it could be because they do not have the money to afford the help of a tutor or books (Lobosco). Some of the less fortunate may not be able to take the test because it is too costly. Therefore, there are not a lot of people from poorer families or minorities in college because they get judged by a test score rather than their work ethic or grades in