Preview

Richard The Lionheart Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
540 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard The Lionheart Research Paper
Explanation of the Importance of Their Family and Background to Their Career
Richard I, also called as Richard the Lionheart, reigned as King of England from 1189 to 1199 for only six months and was famous for his strong revolt against father and mother and his exploits during Third Crusade. He was born on 8th of September 1157 in Oxford, England. He was born between Henry II, the lord of Scotland, Ireland, and Wales and Eleanor of Aquitaine who was the greatest heiress in Western Europe in that time. As Richard was Eleanor’s favourite son out of other children, making him stay with her and getting her care after his parents divorced. This meant that Richard was the heir of her property. From his young age, he was educated as a man and learned how to defend their property.

In 1174, joining his older brothers, Henry the Young King and Geoffrey the Duke of Brittany and encouraged by his mother, Richard rebelled against his father in order to leave only his brother Henry, as the only king living. However his brothers were defeated and
…show more content…
Third Crusade, also called as Kings’ Crusade, was an attempt by Europeans kings to reconquer the Holy Land from Saladin, who conquered the land in 1187. When Richard became the King, he was ambitious and eager to join the Third Crusade. He raised money for his army; however some of his armies was killed during their fleet. Richard arrived at Acre on 8th of June 1191. His accompaniment, Philip II of France was already there fighting against King Guy, who was on Saladin’s side and who was besieging Acre. It was only until Richard and his army had arrived Acre and the opposition fell to the crusades and he was victorious at capturing Acres. After this siege, Philip got sick and returned to France, leaving the crusade in Richard’s hand. Without Richard, the other crusaders would not have been successful at conquering

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wrong Deeds of King John

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1191, Richard left England to embark on the Third Crusade. He left John in charge of the country. John's reputation as a leader had been severely dented as far back as 1185 when Henry II sent him to Ireland to rule. John proved to be a disaster and within six months he was sent home.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How has your exploration of the connections between your prescribed texts enhanced your understanding of the values and contexts of each?…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shortly after Richard III usurped the throne he faced a series of rebellions, the majority of which coming from the south of England. Many people call these rebellions after the Duke of Buckingham but in fact most of the rebellions took place before he switched sides and he himself on backed a few of the rebellions. In these rebellions (Kent, Sussex and Surrey being the biggest ones) Richard needed to rely on his loyal over mighty Lords to crush the rebellions and bring stability back to his reign as King of England.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the rule of the feeble minded King Henry VI and the genius Queen Margaret of Anjou, there was civil unrest in Medieval England due to whom should be the heir to the throne. Henry VI suffered mental breakdowns and so Richard, Duke of York, exploited his claim on the throne garnered by his ties with previous King Henry V. Henry VI and previous kings of England where from the Lancastrian family this meant this was the first instance of non York conformation. This set the beginning of the War of the Roses, based on the questionable rulings and the extreme power of the high nobility in England creating a power struggle between Lancaster and York. Thus it prompted for many changes that would ultimately benefit England in the long run, through…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The untimely episodes of mental illness of Henry the fifth was one of the main cause of the wars of the Roses. This left Richard the third to rule, who was the last Yorkist king. He was defeated at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 by Henry Tudor founder of the House of Tudor. Both houses were in direct descendants of King Edward the third. The ruling Lancastrian king, Henry the fifth, surrounded himself with unpopular nobles. The availability of many powerful lords with their own private armies. The civil unrest of almost all of the population…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard III grew up with many siblings which included three older brothers. He was the runt of the family, so his chances of gaining power were very low. Into his adult life, each of this brothers were dying one by one until the death of his oldest brother, King Edward IV. Richard loved his brother Edward and looked up to him as a hero…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward IV youngest brother, Richard, duke of Gloucester was powerful by himself due to Edward giving him lands in the north; this gave him power, men and was far away from court and London. Richard’s wife Anne Neville’s family owned large amounts of land and power in the north this passed on to Richard, making him stronger and wealthier. Richard could raise an army from his lands this threatened the Woodville family because Richard had the support of the north. He had no opponents with the north and made his own law. Richard also had the support of many nobles loyal to Edward because he had shown his loyalty through the war of the roses; Richard also showed his dedication to England by capturing Edinburgh from the scots. Richard also developed religious patronage, founding collegiate chapels at middle ham and Bernard castle.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard 3rd was born on October 2, 1452, in Fotheringhay Castle. “He died in England in 1485( https://www.biography.com June 6, 2016)“, 50km from where he was born but he met his own in Bosworth field 33years later. In 1485, he leads the finally charge in England’s history. Approximately 600years later his body was found under a car park and was finally given a proper burial at the Leicester Cathedral in England. From his birth to death he was very unpopular as shown in source 7,8 and 9. These are some reasons he affected medieval England. Richard had reason why he did things.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip II, after winning back Acre hurried back to his country saying he has done his job, but secretly he was planning on invading English lands in France while King Richard wasn’t in England so King Richard I was the only one left and the crusades eventually became the “Richard Crusades”. After around one year of war with Saladin, King Richard I realized having Jerusalem back wouldn't last long and be taken away by the Islam again so decides to ask for a ceasefire with a precondition; Christians having the freedom to go to Jerusalem for pilgrimage reasons. However, Saladin didn’t have restrictions on pilgrimage to Jerusalem to anyone, the precondition didn’t mean…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At just age 14 he became the duke of Aquitaine. Richard was rebellious and favoured his mother over his father. He and his brothers came together to protest against his father for giving their youngest brother three castles. This lasted for about a year and after their relationship was never the same. Richard became the King of England through inheritance, like his other titles. Richard did what he wanted and stayed where he wanted; however, while he did not care for much for most he cared greatly for his mother. When his mother was locked up from his father's causing he came to her rescue, earning his nickname Richard the Lionheart. Another important fact to note is that Richard was not the biggest fan of England and left no heirs of his own to succeed him in the throne, causing the throne to go to his brother…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His loss to France really put a big blemish on his record. He is also dismissed as an almost pathetically led king who lacked the nous in political judgment. Edward IV, on the other hand, is described as a decent enough ruler who grew prematurely aged by drink and debauch and opened the way for usurpation for the malevolent Richard III. On the controversial issue regarding Richard III’s wickedness, Norwich disagrees with those stating that he was a much-maligned emperor, stating that he was a ruler devoid of principle and conscience and would do anything to satisfy his political ambitions[CITATION Mic002 \p np \l 1033 ]. Norwich further alludes that there is little doubt in Richard III’s role in the murder of Edward V, his 12-year-old brother and the rightful heir to his…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However this is not enough, Richard is far removed from the throne. Before he can have a legitimate…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V and Richard III depicted how two very different men rose to power and assumed the throne of England. Henry was an intelligent, driven young man who sought to reconstruct the civil war ravaged kingdom after the death of his father. Shakespeare presented Richard as a corrupt, sadistic villain who cared nothing for the English people except that they knew and feared his absolute authority. Both men, though, possessed the same focus and determination, which made the comparison and contrast of these two plays that much more drastic.…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between the two rulers and their own legitimacy led to its fair share of rebellion and resistance as well. Henry IV Part 1 deals primarily with the aftermath of Henry’s taking of the throne, which took the shape of an armed rebellion by the Percies; this rebellion mirrors the feelings and resistance of Catholic dissenters during Elizabeth’s time both historically and through Shakespeare’s guidance. Hotspur and the Percies retained great loyalty to Richard II despite supporting Henry’s claim to the throne -- Hotspur expressed this sentiment many times throughout the play, describing Richard as a “sweet lovely rose” and Henry as a “vile politician,” among other things (1.3). Richard’s effervescence in the minds of the rememberers…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard was born on 2 October 1452 at Fotheringay Castle in Northamptonshire (Wikipedia). His father was Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York and his mother Cecily Neville. Richard had a claim to the English throne through both parents (Kendall p.g. 15). In the play Shakespeare never mentioned this part of Richard’s III life. According to BBC.com, Richards’s father conflict with Henry VI was a major cause of the Wars of the Roses, which dominated Richard's early life. His father and older brother died at the Battle of Wakefield in 1460. In 1461, Richard's brother, Edward, became Edward…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays