Preview

RESJUDICATA IN CPC: Its Essentials And Exceptions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4619 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
RESJUDICATA IN CPC: Its Essentials And Exceptions
INTRODUCTION 'Res ' in Latin means thing and 'Judicata ' means already decided. This rule operates as a bar to the trial of a subsequent suit on the same cause of action between the same parties. Its basic purpose is - "One suit and one decision is enough for any single dispute". The rule of 'res judicata ' does not depend upon the correctness or the incorrectness of the former decision. It is a principle of law by which a matter which has been litigated cannot be re-litigated between the same parties. This is known as the rule of "res judicata" (thing decided).
"Res judicata pro veritate accipitur" is the full maxim which has, over the years, shrunk to mere "res judicata". Section 11 contains the rule of conclusiveness of the judgment, which is based partly on the maxim of Roman Jurisprudence "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium" (it concerns the State that there be an end to law suits) and partly on the maxim "Nemo debet bis vexari pro una at eadem causa" (no man should be vexed twice over for the same cause). The section does not affect the jurisdiction of the court but operates as a bar to the trial of the suit or issue, if the matter in the suit was directly and substantially in issue (and finally decided) in the previous suit between the same parties litigating under the same title in a court, competent to try the subsequent suit in which such issue has been raised. The principle of res judicata is based on the need to give finality and certainty to judicial decisions.

RES JUDICATA AS DEFINED UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure embodies the doctrine of res judicata or the rule of conclusiveness of a judgement, as to the points decided either of fact, or of law, or of fact and law, in every subsequent suit between the same parties. It enacts that once a matter is finally decided by a competent court, no party can be permitted to reopen it in a subsequent litigation. In the absence of such a rule there



References: 1. http://www.Shareyouressays.com/11159/objectsandessentialconditionsofresjudicataindia.htm(1/4/2014) 2. http://lawmanblog.blogspot.in/2012/02/res-judicata-res-judicata-is-phrase.html(2/4/2014) 3. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-res-judicata.htm(2/4/2014)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a court decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent case involving identical or similar facts.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Judgment Rule

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    [3] [pic][4] [pic]The two concepts to which St. Paul alludes are somewhat intertwined. The “one final judgment” rule prevents piecemeal dispositions and multiple appeals by requiring a final (as opposed to interlocutory) judgment before an appeal may lie. (9 Witkin, Cal.Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 43, pp. 66-67.) The doctrine of res judicata also addresses the issue of finality: it gives conclusive effect to final judgments in subsequent litigation between the same parties over the same controversy. (7 Witkin, Cal.Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Judgment, §§ 188-189, pp. 621-622.)…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural Question- May all 10 Plaintiffs sue in same lawsuit? District court says no, must file 10 separate complaints. Court of Appeals reverses and remands the decision.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Studies VCE Unit 2

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the case is being heard in a superior court of record, usually the High Court, Federal Court or state Supreme Court…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Res gestae: means thing done or that hearsay evidence (something that someone heard someone else say) can be used in court…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter One Review

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It means to stand on decided cases. It is a judge made law and each decision becomes precedent. Courts are obliged to follow binding precedents within their jurisdiction. In first impression cases a court may refer to public policy, or widely held social values to make a decision.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the heart of the common law system is the doctrine of stare decisis, which translates to “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis creates precedent and thus, when a court has decided a case in a particular way, future cases should be decided the same way. However, stare decisis will only apply if the facts of the case are substantially similar to the prior case. Precedent acts as a major guide for judges when hearing similar cases.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Stare Decisis Case Summary

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the interest of preserving the respect for the rule of law and cabin judicial discretion a principle of Stare decisis must be applied. This foundational principle in the U.S. legal system sets a base for favoring the adherence to precedent in order to establish a consistent and stable courtroom climate.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boerum Case Study

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Where a trial court makes a ruling as a matter of law, the standard of review is de novo. United States v. Gaviria, 116 F.3d 1498, 1531 (D.C. Cir. 1997). Alleged violations of the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation…

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    picture timeline

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    V. No man or chief shall be permitted to sit as judge of act on a jury to try his particular friend (or enemy), or one who is especially connected with him. Wherefore if any man be condemned or acquitted, and it shall afterwards be made to appear, that some one who tried him acted with partiality for the purpose of favoring his friend (or injuring his enemy), or for the purpose of enriching himself, then there shall be a new trial allowed before those who are impartial.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Criminal Law

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “ In Common Law jurisdictions when a judge is called on to deal with a new set of circumstances he is at liberty to decide according to his own view of justice and expediency; however in Code jurisdictions a judge is bound to deal in accordance with the principles already established, which he can neither disregard nor…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    7th Amendment

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    indicates if if the four justice believe that case she be heard then, a writ of certiorari would be…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The principle of in dubio pro reo (Latin for "when in doubt, for the accused") means that a defendant may not be convicted by the court when doubts about his or her guilt remain.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly thereafter a group of Yale law students with the help of their professor filed a new lawsuit on behalf of Haitian the refugees. Res judicata played a significant role for the students and professor since the court had already rendered a judgment in the Baker case. Res judicata also known as claim preclusion is a legal principle that states a case may not be relitigated once it has been judged on its merits. Simply, a losing plaintiff cannot re-sue the winning defendant for the same reason they did previously. While this doctrine may not seem just it promotes judicial efficiency, fairness, and consistent adjudication. Res judicata only allows a litigant one chance to litigate an issue and the losing party must rely on an…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics