Whether poverty fosters crimes remains a continued source of contention politicians, socialists, economists, psychologist as well as members of the general public. On the one hand, opponents of the debate claim that the problem of crime in the society should be qualified as the consulted outcome of poor structural on security and reliable mechanisms for the nurturing and safeguarding of responsible citizens (Regoli, et al., 2009). On the other hand, proponents in the debate assert of the far-reaching effects of poverty in negating the socioeconomic wellbeing of the people as well as the ability by the government to engage in effective security measures (Kriesberg, 2009). All in all, given evidence of a strong link between poverty andinability by individuals to engage in useful activities, there is no doubt that poverty foster crime. This paper is a critical argument in support of the view that poverty foster crime.
Poverty foster crime.
The proposition that poverty promote crime finds rationale thanks to a number of reasons. On the one hand, poverty is to be blamed for prompting the culture of idleness among members of the community. Humans always engage in pursuing some form of activities as a means for spending their energy. On the other hand, it is a common consensus that an idle mind is the devils workshop. Based on this reasoning, failure by individual members of the community to find useful activities to spend their time in implies their elevated risk of engaging in destructive activities (Winfree & Abadinsky, 2009). This is true given the fact that poverty is a root cause to the problem of chronic unemployment. Increased levels of poverty translate toreduced chances for securing sustainable socioeconomic growth and development in the community and hence promoting the culture of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document