Danny Hurdubei Mrs.Morris English 101 9:30 14 November 2012 Should Henrietta’s Family Receive Compensation Henrietta’s cells have contributed many great things to both the medical and science fields. Her cells have also started many multi-billion dollar companies that specialize in selling her cells in vast quantities. Yet the Lacks families have received little recognition and compensation from the cells. Many people have argued that no one should be able to profit off their own cells or other body parts, because of the many legal, research, and ethical problems. While others argue that since the cells belonged to Henrietta, she should be able to compensate from them.…
G. Chapter 5: “Blackness Be Spreadin All Inside” (1951) 1. How well do you think Henrietta understood her illness? Her treatment?…
Throughout the book Rebecca Skloot shifts back and forth from Henrietta’s history to scientific research to her personal experience. In chapter ten, she gives readers a clear view of what she was seeing when she visited Clover. She describes how “dead” it appears and how things in the town are “suffering.” When she makes her way to Lackstown, she meets one of Henrietta’s Cousins named Cootie. She gets into his background, and the theme of pain and suffering is present again. Cootie says “she been gone so long, even her memory pretty much dead now. Everything about Henrietta dead except them cells.” It shows about the Lacks family that even though they face death and hardships on every side, they don’t give up. Henrietta still took care of everyone, and Cootie still built his house. When Cootie was talking, he had the radio on and a preacher was talking in the background. Cootie was saying that Henrietta’s cells were voodoo; they were either man-made or spirit-made. He talked about spirits that he’s seen and how they have protected him. Then, he relates it all back to the cells, saying that something was over them, because they weren’t any regular cells.…
Racist Experiments Racism is immortal just like Henrietta’s cells it will always be around. People would do anything to be the first to discover something. At the end of the day it’s all about the money. The Mississippi appendectomies and the Tuskegee experiments were similar in the way that the government forced treatment upon minorities without consent. Henrietta’s case was different than Mississippi and Tuskegee because the doctor in Johns Hopkins didn’t experiment on her actual body but on her cells without consent. Henrietta’s case the Tuskegee experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies are all different cases in different locations but serve the same purpose which is to take advantage of poor and uneducated minorities to further medical research.…
Do The Ends Ever Justify The Means? In her novel, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, author Rebecca Skloot addresses the many variations of ethics by telling the readers about the life of a poor African American Southern tobacco worker living in a time where racism was apparent. In 1951, Henrietta was diagnosed with cervical cancer when she was 30 and reseachers had taken her cells without her permission. The major concern that arises in the novel in my opinion is the lack of informed consent and knowledge given to Henrietta before and her family afterwards. Regardless of race, gender, or socio-economic status, doctors and researchers have a moral obligation to inform their patients thoroughly, provide them with side-effects that may occur, and to communicate properly with the family in case of death. While these and some other issues are merely portrayls, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks provides a narrative field within which these issues can be observed by reflecting on the experiences of many different individuals.…
1. “I've spent years staring at [Henrietta's] photo, wondering what kind of life she led, what happened to her children, and what she'd think about cells from her cervix living on forever - bought, sold, packaged, and shipped by the trillions to laboratories around the world” (p.1).…
The question of ethics, which reoccurs throughout the novel, was that of whether the doctors at John Hopkins should have asked for permission before collecting Henrietta’s cells. Another question raised was whether the HeLa cells fame, should have been explained to the remaining Lacks’ and whether or not the family was entitled to a portion of the profits. When Slook came in touch with the family, she began to teach them about their mother and her cells; they were finally beginning to understand the nature of their mother’s cells.…
After reading the book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, what stood out was the root of how Henrietta’s cells went universal. A sample of cervical tissue was taken and a doctor asked David or Day to do an autopsy on Henrietta for the sake of their children. By using Normandale’s College Library course quick start, searching for an article of interest took some time. In Academic Search Premier, I read a few like Our Body, Our Cells; and Returning the Blessings Of an Immortal Life. I then typed HIPAA into the search engine. The first and most recent one was titled HIPAA Fine Is a First by Jessica Zigmond. In this essay, I will relate the article to the book by bringing to surface thoughts you may or may not have critically pondered throughout the reading.…
This is the reason why Henrietta’s cells were immortal and kept growing. A documentary on HeLa cells and Henrietta’s contribution finally gave credit to the Lacks family. The family is still upset because they can’t even afford healthcare but their mothers cells are used everywhere. As Skloot was writing the book many people tried to prevent the family from even talking to her. Eventually Skloot gains Deborah’s trust. The stress of all that has happened in Deborah’s life causes her to become sick and she eventually has a stroke. Although The HeLa cells have led to many great contributions in the studies of viruses the book leaves the reader wondering how the family of Henrietta could have been treated so poorly considering Henrietta’s huge contribution. Henrietta’s case has also had monumental effects on laws about how patients are treated, because of Henrietta patients must give their consent rather than be tested on without their knowledge. Henrietta has had a huge role in science and for this along with her cells her contributions will live on…
It was hard to get in touch with Deborah. She had been through a lot after Sir Lord Keenan Kester Colfield, a con artist, tried to sue Johns Hopkins and the Lacks family. He attacked mainly Deborah and Courtney Speed, who tried to build a Henrietta Lacks museum. Fortunately, Johns Hopkins’ lawyer helped them to dismiss the case. However, she was frightened of everything and trusted no one after that. While her brothers and he father were trying to get money from Johns Hopkins hospital, Deborah was more interested in learning more about her mother. Discovering stories about Henrietta and her immortal cells gave Deborah the toughest time in her…
After Henrietta Lacks died, a doctor in John Hopkins Hospital took her cervical cancer cells and create an immortal cell line without her knowledge. Many researchers used African American’s organ in medical research before the 1970’s without their agreements since they do not have equal rights as white people. Today, these cells are known as HeLa cells, they are one of the most commonly used human cell lines. HeLa cells have been used for research into cancer, AIDS, the effects of radiation and toxic substances, gene mapping, and many other scientific pursuits. I believe that most of us have in one way or another benefitted from the HeLa cells. However, the Lacks’ gained no benefits from their mother’s cells, her youngest daughter, Deborah, told Skloot, “Truth be told, I can’t get mad at science, because it help people live, and I’d be a mess without it. I’m a walking drugstore! But I won’t lie, I would like some health insurance so I don’t got to pay all that money every month for drugs my mother cells probably helped make.” It is highly ironic that the family of the woman who devoted so much to medical research cannot even afford health insurance.…
This book follows the life of Henrietta Lacks and her family right before and after her death through the eyes of a curious science student/reporter. We are told about her lifestyle, giving us background on how she has lived her life leading up to her death. It is revealed that she has been forced to visit the doctor many times due to various diseases and infections obtained from her non-loyal husband Day. After she gives birth to her last child, she begins to feel serious pains in the lower abdominal area of her body, and goes to Johns Hopkins University Hospital for a visit as a last resort to identifying what is wrong with her and helping her recover. The reason for this being last resort rather than a priority in her decision-making for where to get treatment is because of two reasons: money and the color of her skin. It would cost much more to receive treatment at a hospital such as Johns Hopkins, and most hospitals generally did not treat black people as they treated white people. So it is obvious as to why this choice was a last resort. She did indeed receive treatment because, luckily for her, this was one of the few hospitals that actually treated black people like white people. She was not…
She looks straight into the camera and smiles, hands on hips, dress suit neatly pressed, lips painted deep red. It's the late 1940s and she hasn't yet reached the age of thirty. Her light brown skin is smooth, her eyes still young and playful, oblivious to the tumor growing inside her -- a tumor that would leave her five children motherless and change the future of medicine. Beneath the photo, a caption says her name is "Henrietta Lacks, Helen Lane or Helen Larson." Henrietta Lacks is depicted as a normal person who lived in a time of racism and unfair treatment of African-Americans. Although she was black, she managed to seek a hospital that treated both blacks and whites. It was during these treatments that her cells were taken from her without proper consent until a couple of days just before her death. She fortunately gave consent to the cell taking after hearing that it could benefit her children. She is later recognized through her children and they received commemorations in her place for her contribution to scientific research.…
Ethical Health Care Issues Paper HCS/545 July 28, 2014 Shawna Butler In the last decade, the debate over the ethics of organ and transplant allocation has intensified and the attention sensationalized in the media. At the core of this issue, critical questions remain. They include but are not limited to those regarding economics, race, and geographic inequity and about the moral relevance and weight of geography, economics, and other disparities and inequities in transplant allocation (Stanford University, 2012). Transplant allocation raises questions regarding the four of the basic major ethical principles of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, justice and non-maleficence. As such, bioethicists typically refer to the four principles of health care ethics in their evaluation of the merits and difficulties of medical procedures such as transplants. With regards to issue of transplant allocation, the four ethical principles can be applied to the issue in the following ways:…
AP Psychology; Awakenings 1. The abuses at Bainbridge Hospital reflected a broken system at that time. Any person who was deemed untreatable was put into a “garden”- where people were treated like flowers that were simply “watered” and “fed” every day. The attitude of the people who worked at the institution was of people who had accepted the system’s failures as a way of life; they did not strive for change, they simply “went with the flow.” Dr. Sayer introduces a number of attitudes that can be seen in modern care facilities. For example, his unfailing persistence in not giving up on patients who he believed had a chance at life. These patients had been immobile for decades, with countless people telling him that they would never get better. By believing in their cognizance and their persistent awareness of their surroundings, Dr. Sayer creates the hospital environment of today, punctuated with the idea that all patients should have the chance to have the best chance in life. He never gave up hope. However, Dr. Sayer also faced many different obstacles in attempting to treat his patients. For example, he needed to first overcome the mockery of his fellow coworkers. The doctors and nurses who worked with him did not understand his desires to pursue what seemed like a meaningless waste of time. However, in doing so, he gave life back to people who would have otherwise been trapped forever, in a state of permanent limbo. Later, he also faced the crisis of dosage with his “patient zero”, Leonard. Would he cross the line and illegally dose Leonard without the consent of the pharmacist? In doing so, he achieved success. However, he had to do so by compromising the laws set by society. Moreover, he had to muster funding for the drug for all the patients that had been affected at the institution. He could have given up after the head of the hospital told him that it was simply too much money, but he persisted in his efforts and was rewarded with enough funding for…