Preview

Realism and Instruments of Power

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Realism and Instruments of Power
The international environment is very complex, due to the inclusion of various political actors and the interaction of these actors at different levels. Typically, threats emerge from competition between states over geopolitical and traditional issues. Recently, non-traditional threats have emerged that affect the national interests of various countries; one of these challenges that is quickly moving to the forefront of importance is that of energy security, and the related topic of environmental security. Political scientists and leaders try to distill the international environment down to basic theories, which can help determine appropriate courses of action in this landscape of change. Using the theory of realism, and responding with the Instruments of Power (IOP), the US can moderate the threat of energy and environmental security. At the heart of realism is the belief that international affairs is the struggle for power amongst states over self-interested concerns (Snyder, 2004, 55). Realism centers on four principles: states, interests, anarchy, and power. States are the overarching administrative, policing, and military organizations that are led and coordinated by an executive authority (Forsyth, 2008, 8). Interests are the hierarchical goals which a state treats as significant to its well-being; security and survival are the highest ranked goals (ACSC, 2010, L1). Anarchy is not chaos, but rather is the absence of a supreme authority over states to impose order in the international environment. Power is the ability to affect outcomes, the ability to change the behavior of others to make an outcome happen, and is the ultimate way to organize a disorderly world and achieve security (Forsyth, 2008, 9-18). According to realism, the driving force behind international politics is fear, which forces states to exercise their power. States impose order over anarchy in order to achieve security for their interests. Different threats to states’


Bibliography: Air Command and Staff College. Lesson 1 Instructional Narrative, 2010. Air Command and Staff College. Lesson 3 Instructional Narrative, 2010. CIA World Factbook. “Saudi Arabia.” Washington, DC, https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the-world-factbook/ (accessed 19 Apr 2010). Development, 2006. Daojiong, Zha. “China’s Energy Security: Domestic and International Issues.” Survival 48, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 179-189. International Energy Agency. “Energy Security.” Paris, France: International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/ (accessed 19 Apr 2010). Barracks, PA.: US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute (June 2006). King, Col Chris, PhD. “Understanding Environmental Security: A Strategic Military Perspective.” West Point, NY: United States Military Academy, 2004. Snyder, Jack. “One World, Rival Theories.” Foreign Policy (November-December 2004): 52- 62. Bartholomees, Jr. Carlisle Barracks, PA.: US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute (June 2008) United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). “From Conflict to Peacebuilding: the Role of Natural Resources and the Environment.” Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2009. United States Department of State. “Energy, Sanctions, and Commodities Staff.” Washington, DC, http://www.state.gov/ (accessed 19 Apr 2010).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She suggests that different understandings of peace and order have affected states' willingness to intervene forcibly in other states, and aims to describe how changing beliefs and norms are the cause. Finnemore’s main thesis is that realist theory cannot make sense of how modern day interventions take place, because the…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nation states play a significant role in the promotion and enforcement of World Order. The nation states, through compliance with international law and multilateralism retain a significant impact in the enforcement and maintenance of the idealistic notion of World Order, defined as the sole existence of global peace and stability and an absence of conflict. However, state sovereignty and a lack of political will can ultimately impede on the effective enforcement of World Order. Nonetheless, as highlighted by the international humanitarian intervention in March 2011, nation states play a pivotal role in achieving world order.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arrogance of Power Review

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages

    William J. Fulbright, a democratic Senator from Arkansas, was Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1966 when The Arrogance of Power was published. In an excerpt from Fulbright’s book, he analyzes the misguided thinking behind America's global interventionism and its delusion of righteous all-powerfulness. These symptoms are a confusion of power and virtue. Fulbright defines the arrogance of power as, “a psychological need that nations seem to have in order to prove that they are bigger, better, or stronger than other nations” (2). William J. Fulbright uses persuasive appeals in his well structured book, The Arrogance of Power to help convey his views on U.S. war strategies.…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To begin with, security is heart of every foreign policy of any state but the question of what constitutes being secure, security breach or generally in what context security shall be viewed opens doors to a lot of interpretations. Realists view the concept of security from a traditional perspective, which meant military, war to mention a few (Lawson, 2003: 80). This is the underlying idea behind the security that the realists seem to be addressing. As they believe in an anarchic international system where the state is the actor which is power hungry, self-serving and only concerned with its survival, their view of security has everything to do with the respective state in the international community. In other words the state fights for its protection and survival in the international sphere through war or military prowess. But the application of this theory in a quiet and peaceful world becomes problematic. A good example is now that there is peace, how does one explain peace. Even though the realists explain the peace time as being an artificially construed and temporary thing, and war being natural way the international sphere, their argument does not hold much water especially when met with liberalist views on International relations. One must stress out that the realist theory was a very much accepted and may even still be accepted because…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the lack of definition, realism has been successful and has become a dominate theory in international relations (Rosenberg, 1994). Therefore defining it remains an active argument, meaning realist scholars continue to debate the fundamental assumptions of realist…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a famous representative of realism theory, Waltz asked himself the question why do wars occur? “Waltz’s question is as old as war itself, possibly because “to explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” (Waltz, 1959: 2). By the time Waltz posed this question, many answers to it already existed. These answers fell into three categories (or as IR theorists came to define them, were found at the three “levels of analysis” or in the “three images”). These three categories/levels/images are: the individual, the state, and the state system” (C. Weber, 2009, p. 17). These main causes of conflict will be represented in detail in the main body of the paper by the example of Berlin Crisis.…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Audience Analysis Essay

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Professor of peace and world security, Michael T. Klare is the author of several articles and books, including “The Coming Era of Energy Disasters”.(1) I have found that Klare is one sided…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the midst of this, states are constantly battling to shout intentions and read intentions among a cacophony of messages. In this forum acquiring weapons is the most sensible course of action, and as Schelling emphasizes, the nuclear option allows for the “diplomacy of violence.” The mere threat of force is a poignant example of the effects of anarchy, and state attempts to balance power.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the international system of anarchy and complexity, the means of illustrating the key aspect of international society that influences the actions of states, and the motives behind their actions is a complicated process. According to some scholars, the norms of society, both internal and external to the domestic setting, and the conventional perceptions these provide surrounding key issues across the globe, are of upmost importance and hold the most influence upon states. These scholars suggest that states act based on ethical and morally concerned relations, as to correspond with the norms held by the members of their domestic population and the population of the globe. These ideas surrounding social norms however can be proved as somewhat…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The United States has been most successful when it has followed a foreign policy of what might be called prudent American realism,” an approach rooted in both American principals and Aristotelian prudence (27). To truly understand prudent American realism the distinction must be made between American realism and traditional realism, “Prudent American realism, as opposed to a more traditional realism, recognizes that the internal character of regimes matters and that foreign policy must reflect the fundamental principles of liberal democracy ”, meaning that it is in the best interest of the united state if the world shares it’s same views on governing (27). For example, the U.S. has spend and enormous amount of money and involved itself in…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Synthesis

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Mr. Siemiesz’s chapter he explained about the National Security Consequences of U.S Oil Dependence and how it could be fixed and changed for the best interest of the country; Mr. Siemiesz outlined specific points or steps the country could take to make those changes he outlined in the chapter. “Those major energy suppliers from Russia to Iraq to Venezuela have been increasingly able and willing to use their resources to pressure their strategic and political objectives. That these country’s are consuming less oil less then all of the other countries especially the United States. The Fact is that the U.S. makes up to 4.6% of the world’s population but uses 25% of the world’s oil. So the challenge of this is over the next several years the U.S. needs to slow down and stop consuming a lot of Oil and hopefully find new ways to find energy”.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sovereign states have the only power to conduct foreign affairs, since businesses are not involved in signing treaties or in creating law that is applicable to sovereign states. Hence, the operation of treaties is fueled primarily by the interests of the state. The realist perspective supports this claim because it boils down to a state’s interest and the conscious decisions states make. For instance, treaties could lead to opportunities in attracting foreign business through international relations. Even though there is a chance of increasing one’s economy, it can have large impacts on the…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays