Preview

Probate Law Final

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Probate Law Final
To: Stacy Hopkins
From: Suzanne M. Briscoe
Re: Final Assessment Probate 65B
Date: June 12, 2013

1. What does the term “probate estate” refer to?

The term “Probate Estate” quite simply, refers to all the assets and property owned at the time of the defendant’s death that require some form of probate proceeding before the title and assets may be transferred to the proper heirs.

2. If property (either community or separate) goes outright to a surviving spouse or domestic partner how can that person go about collecting it without probate?

A person may transfer community property or separate property by using a Spousal or Domestic Partner Property order with the court to transfer title to the surviving spouse or domestic partner.

3. What are three ways probate can be avoided?

Three ways to avoid probate are:

1) Place all your assets into a living (inter vivos) trust

2) Place money into a trustee bank account that has a named beneficiary, on a “Pay-On-Death Account” or a “Totten Trust Account”

3) Have property held as community property or separate property, with right of survivorship that passes outright to the a surviving spouse or to the domestic partner upon descendants death

4. Why would a couple want to hold property as “community property with the right of survivorship” as opposed just “community property”?

Property that is owned by a married couple or domestic partners that is clearly identified, on the title document, as “community property with the right of survivorship” allows the surviving spouse or partner to inherit the decedent’s half interest automatically without probate. If property is held as community property, one-half of the property goes to the surviving spouse but requires transfer through the court thus making leaving property as “community property with the right of survivorship” a faster way to clear transfer of the property.

5. Whenever

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Janet (taxpayer) residing in Australia is named as the sole beneficiary of a property (1.85 hectares) with a large homestead as a result of the death of a relative on 7/10/2010. The property is not used for commercial purposes and at the date of death, the property was valued at $1.45million. Settlement took place on 21/12/2010. After moving into the homestead shortly after taking ownership, she planned to take a one-year trip which she had been planning for some time in late 2011. The taxpayer felt that the homestead was far too large for her (she is single),…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Illinois statute authorizing transfer of property into tenancy by the entirety states as follows:…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 20 Tax Homework

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. What is the rationale for requiring partners to defer most gains and all losses when they contribute property to a partnership?…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Barney Case Study

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the three legal issues Mr. Barney is facing includes the investment of mountain home that he owns with three of his friends as joint tenants with right of survivorship. A law states that “The interests of the grantees holding property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship shall be deemed to be equal unless otherwise specified in the conveyance” (North Carolina g.s. § 41-2). This explains that when someone is under a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship and during that period if one of the owner dies, the other joint tenants get that owner’s portion in the property regardless of the deceased owner’s will or the rule of interstate succession (Lewis, 2011). In Mr. Barney’s case, one of his friends, Andy dies and his will showed interest of the property which is owned with three friends to his son, Opie. According to the law explained above, Opie is not entitled to become an owner or the partner of this property and therefore, Mr. Barney is not legally liable for the defaulted loan nor can the bank foreclose the property. As…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    a common law srare ro a community property State. Answer c is incorrecr because community properry may be…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    California (CA) is a community property state. All property acquired by spouses during marriage is presumptively the spouses’ community property (CP), while all property acquired before marriage or upon divorce or after permanent separation is presumed to be the acquiring spouse’s separate property (SP). In addition all property acquired by a gift, devise, and descent or through inheritance is presumed to be the acquiring spouse’s SP. However, the spouses may change the character of an item of property by an agreement (such as premarital agreement or transmutation).…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry would like to transfer his property to his wife, Lucy to avoid being vulnerable to creditors. He would like his three heirs to equally inherit the property after his and his wife’s death.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. The lessor is concerned about having a lessee that is responsible and can maintain the property, he wants a family man because they are usually believed to be responsible. However he is motivated to negotiate further with the lessee because he has a noble profession which places him in the category of responsible people in the society. The lessee’s dependencies and motivation is to rent a decent house/apartment that he could rent for two years while completing his residency.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Families “owned” the right to use of land, but they did not own the land itself…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last Will and Testimate

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I give all the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, real, personal, or mixed, of whatever kind and wherever located, after the payment of debts, expenses, and taxes, as mentioned in Article I, and after transfer of my community property mentioned in Article II, subject to the laws of this state regarding community property, to my wife Elizabeth O. Smith, if she survives me. If she does not survive me, I give said residue to my children, John J. Smith Jr., Elizabeth O. Smith, and Bobby Smith.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Probate Court

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages

    being unanimously selected by all the heirs. (This alternative does not apply if the surviving spouse is the sole heir and an action for divorce or separate maintenance was pending at the time of decedent’s death.)…

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probate Code

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nonprobate property is not subject to probate because it cannot be transferred by will or inheritance. The nonprobate property goes straight to the named beneficiary or to the surviving joint tenant(s) or partners. Nonprobate property is part of the decedent’s gross estate for federal and state death tax purposes; it is subject to federal and state estate taxes and state inheritance tax.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Family LAw

    • 2126 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Family law is the body of law pertaining to marriage and matrimonial issues. Its main aim is to protect each member of a family, whether that family is nuclear, de-facto, single parent, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander or blended in nature, as family is the foundation of society. It can be argued that as society progresses in an ever developing world, the law continues to languish behind society’s changing values in regards to the recognition of same-sex relationships, surrogacy and birth technologies and the changing nature of parental responsibility. Although this argument is not true in all circumstances, it is a prominent issue which legislators face, as they are the ones who are required to ensure that the law is reflective of contemporary values.…

    • 2126 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics