Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Private and Publie Job

Good Essays
786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Private and Publie Job
There are always different points of view between the needs of clients for public and for private sectors. There are 4 major factors affecting the choice of different procurement and contractual arrangement in both the public and private sectors. They are “Prestige”, “Profitability”, “Expectation” and “Quality”. The factor will be different in every case or project with different humanity, person, company… Prestige is very important especial for those project by public sector. It could be one of the factors that would affect a company for many years. For an example, many of the government projects is over budget as they thought before, that was not because they had a poor management and arrangement, it was because they will always try to do the best as they can to afford others people negative command. Therefore, change and change happened during the civil work or building time but still need to be finished on time. In this case, the public sectors had to invest more and more money into the project and try to maintain the quality of wok, finishing time on the project and the expectation for public. However it is not usually happened in the private sectors side, because for most of them the major factor affecting them is “Profitability” Profitability is the other major factor, without it no one will get in to the business. Most of the clients on private sectors side will put this factor on the top of their project. Sometime they will decrease the building time for the project. They want to finish it faster mostly because of two issues. First it could save money in their pocket and also they will have more people go for another project. In the positive side it is mean that they can use less time and limited people or workers and less money to work on the projects in hand. Second is the market. In an open market like Hong Kong that we are living right now, the unit price is different in every day. Every single developer want to sell it in a higher price to gain as much as it can. Therefore shorten of time can have a better chance to gain more profit. It is happened for most of the big development company. But there is also negative side for that. Since the make the building time shorter, the quality of work and the expectation may not up to the standard or people expected. Shorten period of time will make work not as good as before for most of the cases. For an example, choice of material and supplier will be limited. It may affect the quality, and also it may have lot of defective. The other two factors are “Expectation” and “Quality”. In every project no matter the client is on public or private sectors side, the will have expectation. Expectation can be so many things. From the design of work, quality of work, finishing time, choosing of material… Many of the things is related to quality and

different people in different position will have different opinion. For an example most of the expectation for the developer (client) from both the private and public sector is try to use as less money as they expected to have the best quality or work material as they could and less time to finished the project, so they could have the more profit. Since time, quality and profit are always cannot have it on the same time, they have to make a decision of give up at least one factor or keeping the one that could make them most success. In this case the two sector may have and different result, because they are facing different of client. For those public sectors expectation is huge for them. It is because they are building something that not only for severing a small group of people, sometime for the world. That is one of the major reason public sector always gain less or nothing. For private side, the just only need to follow what is the market needed in that period of time for those small groups of people. They may not using the best material that they could use or doing the best they could, but they could make the expectation for the people in the market that they involved. Either clients for private or public sectors, the 4 major factors “Prestige”, “Profitability”, “Expectation” and “Quality” cannot be balance at the same time. There is always a hard decision making between left or right and north of south. There is always no true winner but if someone made a right decision to keep what the client needs, there is always a successful project.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is3110 Unit 4

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the project is completed on time then there is no risk for completion. All of the regular risks that apply to a project built on time apply to this one regardless of whether you are building a new infrastructure or modifying an older one. If the project is finished one month early, the quantitative risk really does not exist. It is basically comparable to completing the project on time. Since the project is quoted at 3 million dollars it will stay the same regardless of how fast the project is finished. However, you may see differences. When you rush a project this large you could possibly cut corners or receive poor quality results. If the project is finished two months late there are additional risks. If the company expects to make $20 million dollars annually, and assuming that the 4% penalty is levied against this yearly figure and not within smaller period of time, one month late means that US Industries Incorporated loses $800,000 annually. There doesn't appear to be any additional risk, however, further penalties and the possible eventual loss of the contract to a competitor could result in a poor product. There again appears to be no real quantitative risk involved if the project is finished a month early with the security requirements. If the originally quoted $3 million dollars remains the same regardless of how fast the project is finished and not coupled with hourly or daily wages, then there is nothing to lose financially. However the companies go beyond the required 1.5% completion benchmarks that the contract demands. Rushing a project of this scale also comes with rushed results possibly cut corners or poor quality. The credibility of the company is at stake with such a high profile, high income project such as this, and it is important to use all of the time available to ensure the best product is on display for any customer. The finished project should meet both the time and security requirements but not the service agreement. There does not…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whatever the type of project, there are three important elements of cost, schedule and performance project managers must achieve in order to attain a successful project outcome. These elements are interrelated which means a slight change of one of the elements such as prolonging the project time schedule highly affect the element of cost or more…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    economics 365

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Companies are becoming more competitive over the course of time. As the population grows so do new company’s aiming to be successful. For a construction company, this is especially true. Current businesses and new businesses want growth and the construction companies are who make the physical structure of the business happen. Included in this paper, is a discussion of how horizontal mergers, government policies and regulations related to externalities, and business decisions by management affect the construction business entirely.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Managing Change

    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The pace of change has accelerated to a significant pace in organisation over recent years. Changes in external environment have brought about the need for organisations to adapt their internal attitudes, strategies, structures and operations to meet the demands of new external conditions (Craig et al 2005). The construction Industry is no exception to this rule and in July 1994 Sir Michael Latham was commissioned by the United Kingdom government and industry organisations to review procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry, aiming to tackle controversial issues facing the industry during a period of lapse in…

    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are possibilities of other advantages that the government can take away from this type of contract. On the other hand, there are several disadvantages associated with using this particular type of contract as well; for example, client needs to set aside management hours for controlling and tracking vendor resources including the approval and clearance of time-sheets; it is often difficult to provide accurate budget estimates since there would not be any limits on the hours of utilization; vendor managers will not take responsibility of deliverables and management of stakeholder expectations. These are just a few pros and cons that federal government and its agencies will have to be concerned with, while dealing with time and management…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When a company makes a contract with a government for supplying goods or services without competing against bidders, there is a real risk of corruption and overpricing. The company may feel that it can charge what it wants without worrying about the competition, weakening the incentive to be efficient and provide a good deal.…

    • 773 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Latham, Sir M. (1994) Constructing the Team: Joint review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London…

    • 3744 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Swedish construction business consists of four main actors namely JM, NCC, PEAB and Skanska that historically have had exclusive rights to bid on large-scale governmental projects. This is not a result of corruptive and lobbying activities but rather a result of the sheer size and financial budgets of these projects and firms with the ability to finance them. (Hådell and Uveborn, 2004). This in terms cause extensive competition between the medium players as they focus and fight over signing the medium- to small-scale projects.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If we were to observe some statistics related to the abandoned, delayed and problematic projects in Malaysia, one can simply conclude that, this is not new issue but it has happened long time ago since the 80’s.…

    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The big and big projects they do a bidding and different electrical –contracting put a bid for the bidding. In addition, the company, which wins the bidding, owns the contract. The work is related with entire wiring system of the big construction project, and install the electrical light, power, CCTV system, communication system and cabling etc. and there are many players in the market competing for the same bid. The bid is either for public project or for the private project. Public project is held by the government and is more focused on maintenances of existing…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Weak competition ( existent accommodation is in poor condition as it has been designed during the communism era and has not been dated since…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is not the case with PPP’s. While it can be said that the role of government changes, government still plays a major role. In all cases, it is responsible for a project’s output specifications and in many cases, paying for the services produced by the private sector. Payment however, is based on delivery of the contracted service to the specified…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Private Partnership (PPP) is a contract between a public sector institution/municipality and a private party, in which the private party assumes substantial financial, technical and operational risk in the design, financing, building and operation of a project. Traditionally, private sector participation has been limited to separate planning, design or construction contracts on a fee for service basis – based on the public agency‟s specifications. Expanding the private sector role allows the public agencies to tap private sector technical, management and financial resources in new ways to achieve certain public agency objectives such as greater cost and schedule certainty, supplementing in-house staff, innovative technology applications, specialized expertise or access to private capital. The private partner can expand its business opportunities in return for assuming the new or expanded responsibilities and risks. PPPs provide benefits by allocating the responsibilities to the party – either public or private – that is best positioned to control the activity that will produce the desired result. With PPPs, this is accomplished by specifying the roles, risks and rewards contractually, so as to provide incentives for maximum performance and the flexibility necessary to achieve the desired results “PPP is a partnership between the public and private sectors with clear agreement on shared objectives for the delivery of public infrastructure and/or public services.” There is no single PPP engagement model that can satisfy all conditions concerning a project‟s location setting and its technical and financial features. The most suitable model should be selected taking into account the country‟s political, legal and socio-cultural circumstances, and maturity of the country‟s PPP market and…

    • 9330 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of the study is to examine the common performance criteria for construction projects in Hong Kong and the perceived importance of the criteria from the perspective of the key participants normally involved with the various stages of a construction project (p 377). The Authors used nine specific performance criteria and a questionnaire survey to determine the differences in the levels of importance of the criteria from the perspective of clients, consultants (designers), and contractors. The study did not include suppliers or subcontractors, or others not considered primary stakeholders. Over a six month period, 950 sets of questionnaires were distributed, from which a total of 324 were returned. The response rate is 34.1% (p 380). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA are used to analyze the returned data. The participants are selected by purposive sampling of key participants that have participated in partnering projects in Hong Kong construction projects. A research model, using questions regarding the life of a construction project, determined the order of importance of the questions and their respective performance outcomes. The findings of the study indicate that there are differences in the levels of importance of the criteria among the respondents, and each performance outcome underperforms to any standard that is initially established. Other studies cited in the article list key elements which differ from those determined by Lai and Lam to be necessary for successful project completion (p 383). Although there are differences in methodology and criteria, the conclusion are consistent with those of the…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar Case

    • 1127 Words
    • 7 Pages

    while their strategy to deliver projects end to end didn’t do well in the market. There were market / economy impacts besides large internal…

    • 1127 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays