Preview

Personality Theory Bandura & Carl Rogers

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personality Theory Bandura & Carl Rogers
Running head: Albert Bandura & Carl Rogers

Compare and Contrast Social Cognitive and Humanistic Theories of Personality to the case study entitled Myesha

Course: PSCY3017 Personality Theory II

Personality is an intriguing component in psychology vital for the perception of human beings. Understanding and defining personality has proven to be a difficult task. It is so complex, in fact, that no single theory can adequately define it. If one was to ask an ordinary individual to do so, some of the most common answers might be “a person’s characteristics” or “the impression (s) one makes on others”. Personality Theorists on the other hand view personality as the essence of the person, the individual’s true inner nature (Rathus, 2004). According to Carver and Scheier (2000), “Personality is a dynamic organization, inside the person, of psychophysical systems that create a person’s characteristic patterns of behaviour, thoughts, and feelings” (p.5). For this assignment the assumptions of the Social-Cognitive and Humanistic theoretical paradigms of personality will be applied to evaluate the personality of the case study, Myesha. It will also discuss personality tests- methods/instruments, used to measure whether people are sad, glad or bad and how people with certain personality traits respond to life’s demand. Before one can begin to understand and assess this individual’s personality, it is important to briefly review the Social-Cognitive and Humanistic theories of personality with their respective theorists such as Albert Bandura and for the Humanistic approach, Carl Rogers. According to Passer & Smith (2007), social cognitive theory is a perspective that was developed by Albert Bandura. It “combines the behavioural and cognitive perspectives into an approach to personality that stresses the interaction of a thinking human with a social environment that provides learning experiences” (p.467). It is proposed



References: Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy, Encyclopedia of human behavior. Academic Press, 4, 77-81 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modelling Bandura, A (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. Retrieved on 12th Feb 2010 http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Bandura1999HP.pdf Bandura, A. (2001) Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology Bandura, A. (1974). The case of the Mistaken Dependent Variable. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83 (3), 301-303. Bandura, A. (1978). The Self System in Reciprocal Determinism. American Psychological Association, 33 (4), 344 - 358. Barone,F. D., Hersen,V., B, V., & Hasselt, V.( 2004). Advanced Personality (1st Ed). Springer. Betz, N., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men Betz, N. E., Klein, K., Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the Career Decision- Making Self-Efficacy scale Carver,C.S and Scheier,M.F. (2000).Perspectives on personality (4th Ed.)Allyn and Bacon. Engler, B. (2008). Personality Theories (8th Ed). Wadsworth Publishing. Friedman, S. H., & Schustack, W. M. (2008). Personality Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th Ed) Funder , C. D., & Ozer, J. D. (2001). Pieces of The Personality Puzzle (2nd Ed). Norton and Company Inc. Gladding, T. S, (2000). Counseling: A Comprehensive profession (4th Ed). Prentice Hall, Inc. Harré, R., & Gillet, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Hergenhan, B.R., Olson, M. H. (1999). An introduction to theories of personality. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Pajares, F. (1996). Self efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66 (4), 543-578. Passer, W. M., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior (3rd Ed). Pervin, A. L., Cervone, D., & john, P.O. (2005). Personality Theory and Research (Eds). John Wiley. Rathus, A.S. (2004). Psychology Concepts and Connections. New York: Thomson Rogers, C Swann, B. W.,Griffin, J. J., Predmore, C. C., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive affect crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement Taylor, K., & Betz, N. (1983). Applications of self efficacy theory to understanding the treatment of career indecision

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Psychodynamic Worksheet

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personality can be described as a set of characteristics possessed by an individual that has an effect on his or her behaviour. There are several personality theories within psychology which give different ideas and attempt to give an explanation about the way personality develops. The psychodynamic and social-cognitive theories are two of the many ways personality is explored in psychology. The psychodynamic theory explains personality in terms of interactions of various components whereas the social-cognitive theory focuses on the individuals thoughts in order to explain…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Friedman, H.S., & Schustack, ,M W. (2009). Personality: Classic theories and modern (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson: Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Friedman, H. S., & Schuustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed.). : Pearson Education, Inc..…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Personality is an individual’s unique and relatively consistent patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. Learning about personality helps us to understand how and why people act the way they do. There are four perspectives of personality: psychoanalytic perspective, humanistic perspective, social cognitive perspective and trait perspective. The psychoanalytic emphasizes the importance of unconscious mental processes and the influence of early childhood experience. The humanistic perspective represents an optimistic look at human nature, emphasizing the self and the fulfillment of the person’s unique potential. The social cognitive perspective…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    personalitytheoryoutline

    • 2193 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Personality theory is a grand subject centered between six foundational tenets. Each tenet will be discussed in detail and be accompanied by factual, scholarly evidence. Each tenet is different from the other but also entwined in the whole of the personality. The tenets each have their own relation to the individual personality; however, they are also relational to one another and work together to make up the whole personality. In order to be psychologically healthy, certain progress needs met under each foundational tenet.…

    • 2193 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2013). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. (2013). Theories of personality (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psy 250

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Friedman,H.S. & Schustack, M.W. (2009, July 15). Personality: Classic theories and Modern Research, Fourth Edition: Retrieved from University of Phoenix: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/ebooklibrary2…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychodynamic Theorist

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our personality is our characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling and acting (Psychology David G Myers), it’s the combination of traits that ‘outlines the doctrine of uniqueness’ (Gifts Differing – Understanding Personality Types) that sets us apart from everyone else. Psychologists vary between themselves concerning the meaning of personality. Most would agree that it originated from the Latin word persona’ – meaning a theoretical mask – but they differ on how an individual obtains this ‘unique mask’ (i.e. how they develop their personality) and thus this brings the divers theories of personality. This essay will compare and contrast two popular theories: one being the: Psychoanalytic theory, and the other a Humanistic approach.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychosocial Paper

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Cervone, D. & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. (4 ed.). Pearson.…

    • 2192 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chart of Theories

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays