Preview

Personal Narrative: The Apology Of Socrates

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1045 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personal Narrative: The Apology Of Socrates
As the world becomes more immersed in advanced technology and more discoveries are made, we assume we know everything. If Socrates were here today he would repeat what he said to Athenians 2,400 years ago, that we know nothing. After Socrates encountered the Oracle of Delphi, which told him he was the wisest man in Athens, he went on a journey to try to disprove the oracle. He did this by asking politicians, poets and craftsmen questions. He knew that he didn’t know everything and along the way, he realized that the public didn’t know more than he did, just that they thought they did. He concluded that he knew nothing and because he acknowledged this, he was the wisest man in Athens. (The Apology of Socrates, 32-35). Socrates’ anecdote …show more content…
It allows many doors to open in life; however, you have to remain realistic and understand that everyone has limitations. I was born legally blind and my parents were always told that I would never be self-sufficient and would most likely not go to college. Nonetheless, they decided to never tell me I couldn’t do anything. I continued to push myself and didn’t quit at anything before I even gave it a chance like some doctors advised. If I had a closed mind and believed what I was told, instead of questioning it, I wouldn't be attending USC, and I wouldn’t be writing this paper today. My parents kept me optimistic and held my doors open for me at a young age so that I could walk through them and open more doors for myself when I got older. It is important to be optimistic, but realistically everyone has limits. For example, I knew that I wouldn’t be able to drive because of my vision, so I didn’t push for that. Not only would that put me in danger, but also all society. You need to know your limits because not everyone can be president. However, still push yourself because you won’t get anywhere in life if you are …show more content…
Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives. Like Athenians, we are so quick to ignore someone's views just because they do not mirror our own. You need to accept that you are not omniscient, and if you think you are then that can lead to arrogance. For example, history is only told by the side that won because they thought they knew everything. Nevertheless, at the next battle, they could

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. After hearing the oracle, Socrates plans to find a wiser man than himself to…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Socrates has made the absolute most just decision with everything he could have done. It still remains remarkable to me that he had turned down such an easy and pleasant life of exile to take on his execution that he is innocent for. Although it seems like such a hard thing to pass on, I know I would have done the exact same thing after some deep thought about how it would impact myself along with the rest of the community. I fully stand behind Socrates’ decision by staying in prison and taking on his…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates chooses to sacrifice his life to justice. He thinks his motherland raised him up and he had already made the agreement with his State, so he should obey the rules. Besides, he thinks he ought not to return an injustice or an injury to any person, whatever the provocation, so he would not escape from the prison, because this behavior may injure his State. Moreover, it is really important thing is not to live, but to live well, which is the same thing as to live…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This would go on until the person that Socrates was talking to (such as Euthyphro) winds up in the same position, recognizing that they didn’t know all that they thought they knew, then walks out irritated. I think, this raise an interesting humanity question for us. We claim that we value the truth more than lies, yet at the same time we would found ourselves similarly irritated by people (like Socrates) who challenge our ideas and put us in a position where suddenly the idea that we have been defending, we can suddenly see it’s not a good position that we thought it was, yet typically we don’t welcome…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the false accusations in the Apology, Socrates is imprisoned for being wrongly tried and condemned to death, later on he is greeted by Crito his friend who visits in the cell with him. Crito tries to convince him through compelling, but at times selfish arguments. Socrates responds against these arguments with selfless reasons to explain the bigger issue of his own principles. Firstly, Crito argues minor and major points of logic on why it is right to escape, but Socrates does not escape based on his obedience to divine command. Secondly, Socrates reasons that he does himself justice by obeying the law at hand and dying will do him more good than harm because he has lived his whole life according to what is just and good and betraying his sensible reasons would only convict him of not doing what he stood for. In the end, Socrates will not go against the laws that govern the state not for the sake of obeying itself, but he knows…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    THE APOLOGY OF SOCRATES.

    • 12076 Words
    • 49 Pages

    I know not, O Athenians! how far you have been influenced by my accusers for my part, in listening to them I almost forgot myself, so plausible were their arguments however, so to speak, they have said nothing true. But of the many falsehoods which they uttered I wondered at one of them especially, that in which they said that you ought to be on your guard lest you should be deceived by me, as being eloquent in speech. For that they are not ashamed of being forthwith convicted by me in fact, when I shall show that I am not by any means eloquent, this seemed to me the most shameless thing in them, unless indeed they call him eloquent who speaks the truth. For, if they mean this, then I would allow that I am an orator, but not after their fashion for they, as I affirm, have said nothing true, but from me you shall hear the whole truth. Not indeed, Athenians, arguments highly wrought, as theirs were, with choice phrases and expressions, nor adorned, but you shall hear a speech uttered without premeditation in such words as first present themselves. For I am confident that what I say will be just, and let none of you expect otherwise, for surely it would not become my time of life to come before you like a youth with a got up speech. Above all things, therefore, I beg and implore this of you, O Athenians! if you hear me defending myself in the same language as that in which I am accustomed to speak both in the forum at the counters, where many of you have heard me, and elsewhere, not to be surprised or disturbed on this account. For the case is this: I now for the first time come before a court of justice, though more than seventy years old; I am therefore utterly a stranger to the language here. As, then, if I were really a stranger, you would have pardoned me if I spoke in the language and the manner in which I had been educated, so now I ask this of you as an act of justice, as it appears to me, to disregard the manner of my speech, for…

    • 12076 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He does not even believe in the Polis let alone acknowledge or worship it. Socrates is the kind of guy that does not have anything to do with the Athenian community unless it involves himself or some form of his actions. He is just known as one of those people and that is another reason why he should be put to death. He is a flap-doodle that cannot stand to listen to political morals, or any type of politics unless it is based around him. Socrates thinks the whole world revolves around him. He does whatever he wants, and it does nothing for the community. He is a horrible teacher and a straight up horrible person in general to make someone do such a thing like that. To bring it down to simple terms, Socrates is not focused on anyone but his own self. He does not care about the community or the gods or the governments decisions. I do believe that this should be enough evidence for the death of this malicious, egotistical quack. He is a felonious sneak that should serve any if not all types of punishments doable to him until his vagabond of a person is proclaimed guilty by the trial.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Continuing on, Socrates states, “what’s best and easiest isn’t to put down other people, but to prepare oneself to be the best on can” (39 d). He says this in a last attempt to teach the people in the courtroom. He knows that younger people will step up in his place and continue questioning the higher authorities of Athens just as he did. He knows that the Athenians will never be free of Socrates just because he has been condemned to death. Socrates has taught many people and has many followers that will continue his work. He says the best and easiest thing to do isn’t to put down other people because more people will just step up after they put down the first. Putting people down for what they believe will not free the Athenians from questioning and they teachings of Socrates. It might even fuel Socrates followers’ cause. Socrates warns the jury that it would be easier if they did not worry about Socrates and his followers and to let them be and instead focus on themselves. If they bettered themselves and were able to answer Socrates questions, then they would truly be free.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates had experienced the effects of this analogy first hand. First, one needs to take into consideration that the democrats of his time represented the ones controlling the shadows on the walls. This of course made the prisoners content with this reality. Likewise, anyone who questioned this reality or truth, would be considered a disruptive nuisance. They would then face the possibility of execution, just as Socrates. Therefore, it is obvious that they both did not care for the injustice of democracy, which is the ignorant ruling the unaware.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Apology By Socrates

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Conscription has been around throughout centuries and is used within modern society when necessary. With conscription being a controversial topic, societies negative view is due to lack of education in regards to conscription; which has lead to neglect of an eighteenth and nineteenth century political ideology in need of reform. In Plato’s writing “The Apology,” Socrates is on trial for “infecting the youth” (Solomon 8). In an attempt to defend in his innocence to the court, Socrates elucidates, “It is not difficult to avoid death, gentlemen of the jury, it is much more difficult to avoid wickedness for it runs faster than death”(Solomon 3). Socrates here touches on the topic of integrity and honor, which he later exemplifies through his…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not Socrates is truly breaking the law by practicing philosophy is questionable. In the city of Athens it is said that Socrates has corrupted the youth by teaching his incorrect version of philosophy and creating new gods. It is for this reason that he is being wrongly accused and put on trial. Socrates positions in the Apology and the Crito, in regards to following the law, appear to be contradictory to each other but in fact they are consistent in most ways. In the Apology, Socrates states that he would much rather die than refrain from spreading his wisdom of philosophy. In the Crito, Socrates refuses to escape from prison with Crito because he believes that it is morally wrong to intentionally break the law. This is an interesting reason for Socrates to believe this because he is being acquitted for supposedly breaking the law. There is a slight irregularity with Socrates arguments over following the law. In the Apology he seems to have no care…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the stand Socrates takes, he argues that since he has lived in Athens all his life, he is required to stand his ground and take what 's thrown his way, even if that punishment is death. Socrates says "do you think you have the right to retaliation against your country and its laws?" (Plato) Socrates was a master of words. It is easy to say that his intellect allowed him to make anyone see all sides of an argument. Even Crito at times is confused about his decision to free his friend, thinking that he is making the right decision. Socrates continues, "or do you think it possible for a city not to be destroyed if the verdicts of its courts have no force but are nullified and set at naught by private individuals."(Plato) Socrates’ words are very convincing, but what he is not thinking about is the fact that this whole predicament was not meant to be. Socrates was supposed to be in all likelihood banished from Athens by the courts. Nobody suspected that Socrates would advocate for his own death. In regards to his situation, if he were to leave, the towns’ people would not have thought badly about his decision to keep his life. Perhaps if he had though about this, he would…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowing the fact that most people are unaware of their own ignorance, Socrates decided to teach and inspire others to learn better about themselves. As Socrates believes, his efforts actually helped some Athenians to examine the meanings of their lives, however, majority of fellows still didn't trust his ideas, and some of them even set him as their enemy because of his weird opinions. As a result, Socrates received the death penalty in the end, but still, as he said, "The difficulty, is not to avoid death, but to avoid unrighteousness; for that runs faster than death" (17).…

    • 1444 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates on Moral Value

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates lived during a time of crucial transition in Athens. The city sought recover and stabilize from its defeat, and from this situation that public had began to doubt democracy as an effective form of government. The famous trial of Socrates is known to be an essential event, which revealed key themes to Socrates’ teachings and beliefs about moral and virtue. The Apology and Crito were fundamental to revealing those beliefs and played an important role in conveying Socrates’ position on living a meaningful life of moral worth; through those documents we can see that his grasps on his beliefs were firm up until his execution, denying any fear of death in pursuit of the maximal exemplification of his teachings.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates - The protagonist of The Apology, as well as all of Plato 's other dialogues. Socrates seems to be a very simple man, not having many material possessions and speaking in a plain, conversational manner. However, this seeming plainness is all a part of the ironic characteristic of Socrates ' method. Professing his own ignorance, he engages in conversation with someone claiming to be an expert, usually in ethical matters. By asking simple questions, Socrates gradually reveals that his interlocutor is in fact very confused and does not actually know anything about the matters about which he claimed to be an expert. The quest for wisdom and the instruction of others through dialogue and inquiry were considered by Socrates to be the highest aims in life: one of his most famous sayings is, "The unexamined life is not worth living." Some have argued that Socrates himself never advanced any theories of his own, and certainly many of the doctrines that appear in the later dialogues are of Plato 's invention. In early dialogues, such as The Apology, Plato presents us with a Socrates who is less informed by Platonic philosophy and serves more as foil for his interlocutors who claim to have positive knowledge.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays