Preview

Nagarani Nanda Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nagarani Nanda Summary
Justice means that everyone is treated fairly. What is “fair” is hard to define. In the narrative of Nagarani Nanda, there are two entities able to judge how justice is carried out: the police and Queen Cobra. The police are supposedly bound by the law, though they can stray, led by their own selfish desires. Nagarani is not bound by the law. She believes police corruption is wrong, and those who break the rules and hurt others for their own gain should be punished. The law and the morals of individuals often conflict, which limits justice and how it is carried out. Justice is hindered by the law. If a person rapes or murders, but it cannot proven guilty in court, they walk free. A court case must be tried within the parameters of the law.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no justice if there is no trial and there is no trial when the legal system is engaging in unethical…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime Control Model Paper

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The criminal justice system in the United State has traditionally operated under two fundamentally different theories. One theory is the Crime Control Model. This theory is characterized by the idea that criminal should be aggressively pursued and crime aggressively punished. The other theory is the Due process Model. This theory is characterized by the idea that the rights of the accused need to be carefully protected in any criminal justice investigation.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian legal system doesn't deliver justice equally for all Australians. In this essay, the issues of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values, access to the legal system and issues of fairness in the law will be discussed. There are several relevant examples that have influenced the viewpoint of this essay. The case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, the case of Amy vs Adam (www.lawcouncil.asn.au) and the case of Brendan Dassey.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had all heard the same case, but due to the vast differences in their personal lives, they had all come to different conclusions. With two very strong willed and different individuals arguing, I found it surprising that they had managed to reach a point in which they decided a compromise was best. The idea of compromise, however, brought something completely different into account, the relationship of law and justice. The distinction between the two is very interesting, what really draws the line between the two? Does justice appeal more to emotion and law more to logistics? If that’s the case then how can someone reasonably mix the two in order to get a fair punishment if one is…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our reading there are two models to today’s Justice System, the Consensus model, and the Conflict model. The Consensus Model of Criminal Justice is “a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the systems’ components work together harmoniously to achieve the social product we call justice.” The other model,the Conflict Model, is “a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the system’s components function primarily to serve their own interests. According to this theoretical framework, justice is more a product of conflicts among agencies within the system than it is the result of cooperation among component agencies.” Both of these models or beliefs, are evident in everyday of our society, whether found by watching the evening news, or spending the day in the courtroom…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice and the law do not always coincide, as evident in ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’. The legal system and the views of society do not always reflect each other. When society demands the persecution of those ‘guilty’ of punishable crimes and the legal system fails to prevail, justice…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It ignores the possibility of unremorseful offenders and unwilling victims, challenges the criminal justice system operation, undermines the law- that define crimes and send offenders to prison, as well as outline the rights that protect citizens from the government. Crime can ruin lives, destroy relationships, and a mediated conversation can’t heal every wound, or address the problem at large. It reduces the legitimacy of law, which citizens are required to abide by, and believe in. The lack of established process results in discrepancies in outcomes; refuting the idea of equality before the law. Objectivity is essential to due process, and working with the victim eliminates the possibility of legitimate and fair consequences. This includes both extremes, harsh punishment for a minor crime and or no punishment for a harsher crime. The decision rests in the hands of a common citizen, who is usually virtually uneducated of the process of law as compared to appointed justices. Justices are appointed to fairly evaluate the situation and proceed in accordance with the law, and restorative justice can give too much power in the hands of those in the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between what society believes is important and worth protecting and how it is reflected in criminal law can be described in many ways. Society in general views actions such as murder, rape, robbery or even burglary as an act, evil in nature, public or of moral principles. These actions are considered to be Malum in se. Laws which are viewed as Malum prohibitum, consist of acts banned by laws such as speeding, drug use, or even prostitution. These acts are seen as regulatory infractions, more examples include, inside traders who illegally share information or avoiding tax payments. The only way for a person to be criminally prosecuted there must be proof that harm at any time was done to another.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harm Principle Law

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We as humans may think that the punishment toward the criminal may fit the crime that they created. Principle laws, a society ultimately degenerates into despotism--the rule of the strong and violent over the weak and nonviolent. Harm Principle laws are essential, and every government on Earth has them. Some laws are based not strictly on harm or self-harm concerns, but also on promoting the personal morality of the law 's authors (Head, 2014). On a law standpoint, it is wrong to commit a crime against anyone regardless of their circumstances.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The fact that our legal system is adversarial is a major contributor. Because the nature of our legal system is competitive and confrontational, it is designed to determine where laws have been broken so punishment can be dealt out. The legal teams employed are also seeking for winning cases, gaining reputations and are willing to project selective facts of a case only in order to win. Therefore, our system is not designed to seek the truth and equality is not achieved for the individual (offender).…

    • 3308 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can understand the difference between what is right and what is wrong. In the legal system, a person's failure to act can result in a terrible situation where someone can die. William Faulkner's short story "A Rose for Emily" shows how a whole town doesn't use the law to help in the situation, which was the result of the death of Homer Barron. The argument will be that there was an affirmative duty and the townspeople failed to respond.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the criminal justice system discuss the effectiveness of legal and non-legal measures in achieving justice.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ● Although justice may be an elusive concept, it is important to recognize that criminal justice…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miscarriages of Justice

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The statement "It is better that 10 guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" summarises and highlights the mistakes and injustices in the criminal justice system. In a just society, the innocent would never be charged, nor convicted, and the guilty would always be caught and punished. Unfortunately, it seems this would be impossible to achieve due to the society in which we live. Therefore, miscarriages of justice occur in the criminal justice system more frequently than is publicised or known to the public at large. They are routine and would have to be considered as a serious problem in our society. The law is what most people respect and abide by, if society cannot trust the law that governs them, then there will be serious consequences including the possible breakdown of that society. In order to have a fair and just society, miscarriages of justice must not only become exceptional but ideally cease to occur altogether.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays