Preview

Monopoly In The United States Of America Before The Standard Oil Company

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monopoly In The United States Of America Before The Standard Oil Company
Walden 1 What is a monopoly? A monopoly is exclusive control of a commodity or

service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation

of prices. A perfect example of a monopoly was Rockefeller’s Standard Oil

Company from 1870-1911. The company was later found to have been an illegal

monopoly because it drove out all the other competitors to become the only

standard oil company, allowing complete control over charges for oil. This paper

will discuss the economy in the United States of America before the standard oil

company, what happened during the standard
…show more content…
The case did not go their way. In 1911 the Supreme Court ruled that the

Standard Oil Trust used illegal means to become a monopoly and therefore had

to break the trust up into 34 different companies that were distributed to the

stockholders ("The Dismantling of The Standard Oil Trust").

In conclusion, the writer of this paper full whole-heartedly agrees with the Supreme Courts decision to break the company up into 34 smaller companies.
A company should not be allowed to drive out all the other competitors and be a monopoly. They should work their way to the top just like the other companies have to. They should have to be creative and innovative to gain customers instead of driving out the competition using illegal means. The United Walden 5
States of America has learned a valuable lesson from John D. Rockefeller's illegal monopoly. We as a nation have learned from history and the United States has set laws in place for it not to happen again. Since john D. Rockefeller's incident, The United States of America has established several antitrust laws to prevent companies from the tactics used by John D.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Pierpont Morgan was a successful financer, that more than once saved the U.S economy; he would manipulate the economy to his will, before the Federal Reserve was assembled. As a result in order to acquire all of this power he would create monopolies. John Pierpont Morgan was trying to create a steel monopoly, and was already a stockholder of every railroad company. According to investopedia John would merge with other strong competitors, this would expand his reach throughout the market and have more control over certain businesses, as well reduce competition, therefore, creating monopolies. Under those circumstances, people started questioning the immense control that he held over the economy, he was praised and criticized for his involvement…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government should break up Standard Oil’s monopoly. In 1870, John D. Rockefeller started his Oil corporation in Ohio. They had about 10,000 shares. Him and, William Rockefeller, who was his brother, Henry Flagler, chemist Samuel Andrews, silent partner Stephen V. Harkness, and Oliver Burr Jennings all partnered up to make this company become one of the first and biggests around. Then about 37 stockholders decided to put their shares into trust with an organization called the trustees. This system became so successful that other enterprises used this technique also. Eventually John’s company was spreading so fast as he was getting richer, he saw no need for other oil companies, so he bought out almost all his rivals. With no other companies…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a free enterprise system, all companies strive have a competitive edge over its competitions be it in a more specialized labor or a innovative product. This was also what allowed Andrew Carnegie to rise to his peak, had it not been for his ability to chose who to work for as a consumer he would've been unable to gain a substantial wage and in turn unable to start his investments or even his company. He was born in the lower rung of the society he lived in, but due to his hard…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Large corporations began to form monopolies in the 1800s. Competition helps the economy, by allowing the control of products and prices. However, in a monopoly there is only one seller of the product. Monopolies may cause prices to increase greatly, but only the corporation benefits. In order to seize control of large corporations was to form a trust. The federal government passes a series of antitrust laws in order to have a successful economy.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When one company controls an entire area of goods or services, so that customers don't have other choices.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plessy vs. Ferguson

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case had an extremely huge impact on society. It allowed segregation to continue legally until 50 years later. In 1956,…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his article, “How Corruption is Strangling US Innovation,” James Allworth delineates why for the most part, capitalism’s sole beneficiaries are incumbent firms. It is these incumbent firms such as “NADA and Comcast” that hinder the innovative efforts of up-and-coming organizations/companies, by establishing “ridiculous regulations that new entrants must contend with.” These dominant firms thwart the efforts of small, but rising companies because it does not suit their interests to allow the competitor to come in and run off with their current customers, who will most presumably prefer the innovation, offered by the developing company to the incumbent’s conventional, pre-existing product/service that lacks innovation. People are drawn to innovation, so naturally with innovation in place, dominant firms eventually lose their dominance due to the competition of innovation. Hence, it is for their very survival that these large, incumbent firms impose such “ridiculous regulations” making the “new entrants lives very difficult.”…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eu Competition Policy

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, the competition between the companies must be unbiased. A company that is dominant in a market has no right to abuse its power to eliminate its competitors (e.g. the giant Intel tried to exclude competitors from the market of electronic chips, reducing the capacity of the competitors to compete with Intel in order to narrow consumer’s choices). Companies are not allowed to fix prices or share any markets (cartel: set a price higher than that resulting from free competition). Acting otherwise would be breaking the rules of pure competition and undermining market efficiency and consumer options.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (3) Substitutes: Availability of substitute goods can limit price level P, so as to deter buyers from switching to substitute product or service.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the most part, companies are free to pursue competition. However, ethical issues could arise in the use of exclusivity in deals and territories. As in the example of MAC cosmetics above. An ethical question could arise if in part of the negotiations that MAC made with the retailers was the fact that they would not be allowed to sell any other product. Or that the product could only be sold in Beverly Hills and not in the Los Angeles…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Monopoly, also known as a monopoly seller, selling alone, exclusive, generally refers only to one or more sellers in the market, through one or more stages, in the face of competitive consumer; and monopsony opposite. Monopoly on the market, can freely adjust the price and yield (not simultaneously adjust). Monopoly can be legally exclusive privilege to control sources of supply, or together or work together to achieve the behavior of enterprises. [1]…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Topics for Finance Gd

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • What do you think of this firm's (one that is in the news) decision to go public?…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuffy

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    7. Monopoly – (noun) Complete control by one group of the means of producing or selling a product or service, a company having complete control. From the Greek word monos, meaning “one” and polein, meaning “to sell.” The Chinese government’s monopoly of ticket sales to the Olympics allowed them to sell the tickets to whoever they wanted and for whatever price they wanted.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Environment

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A situation in which a single company or group owns all or nearly all of…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays