Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Mongol Brutality

Good Essays
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mongol Brutality
Although the Christian and Muslim warriors were of extreme cruelty, the Mongols brutality and carelessness was far greater because of their battle tactics, physiological warfare, and weaponry. These ‘barbarians’ captured a surplus amount of land in a stunning amount of time with questionable war tactics. Despite the brutality of the Mongols, Christian and Muslin warriors began to become more and more merciless. All three of these groups of warriors prove to be dangerous and cruel, but the Mongols seem to have the perfect mix of terror and destruction to make them the most brutal.
The Mongols warfare tactics, although quite cruel, proved effective. When the Mongols wanted a village or town to expand their empire, they attacked with full force. The devastating thing about these attacks though, was the ‘no mercy’ kind of mindset they showed. These warriors were known to kill everything to get what they wanted, men, women, and children alike. The Muslim and Christian warriors were thought to have slaughtered whole towns before, but unlike the Mongols, it was not a tactic they were known for.
The Mongol people were feared everywhere they went as word spread about these ruthless attacks. The fear these warriors inflicted on some people was enough to surrender attacks and turn over cities before a battle even began. Although whenever the Muslim or Christian warriors approached a battle, it was fought. This proves just how cruel yet skilled these Mongol warriors must have been. However, in most cases, just surrendering seemed to be the better idea, because in the case you didn’t, your city may have been looted and burned with all your people slaughtered.
The Mongols success and expansion is largely due not only to their war tactics but also to their advanced weaponry. The Mongols were expert horsemen and masters of the bow and arrow, therefore adding to their success. These warriors used special ‘long bows’ to have more powerful and precise a weapon; they also used horses to charge into villages and slaughter those inside. Worst of all, the Mongols were thought to have catapulted dead bodies infected with the plague over city walls to kill all of the residents through biological warfare. The Christian and Muslim warriors, although with good weapons, could not match the expertise, power, and experience the Mongols had with their weapons. Their weaponry was simply more advanced and powerful adding to the brutality of these cruel Mongols.
The Mongols were extremely powerful warriors, with disturbingly merciless attacks. These warriors’ slaughtered entire towns, looted cities, and then burned them to the ground. The Christian and Muslim ways of warfare could in some aspects be similar to that of the Mongols, but not nearly to the extent of the Mongols. These warriors who made cities surrender before an attack even began and who had advanced weaponry matched with expert and experienced weapon holders were practically unstoppable. These cruel slaughtering’s, feared attacks, and powerful weapons used with no mercy outweigh any opposition in the argument of why the Mongols were more brutal than Christian and Muslim warriors.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Out of many conquerors, the Mongols were the most barbaric empire wise. In document 1, it shows that the Barbarians conquered almost five million square miles of land throughout their reign. This shows that they would go through any means to achieve their goals. To conquer many large, neighboring empires, the Mongols would have had an outstanding army to do all of these tasks. Compared to the other conquerors the…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mongols DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Mongols, who eventually became known as the Tatars, were one of the most savage conquerors of history. The Mongols had good military tactics, that’s how they conquered many so fast. They were very clever in their battles and planned ahead. They didn’t act until they had plenty of men or when they had…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mongols were very barbaric, their reputation was not pretty, they slaughtered entire cities and left one person alive so they could tell the terrible story.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongol army went into battle with a brutal well planned tactic with the intent of causing maximum damage, “I’ll trick them and make them come out in the open. I’ll pretend to retreat and when they come out I’ll attack them,” this contributed greatly to the success of the Mongols (Doc: 1). Marco Polo’s biased description the soldiers stuck out from the documents “their arms are bows, iron maces, and in some instances, spears” (Doc: 3). The fact that Polo was sent by the Mongol ruler to administer the realm contributes to this bias. The warriors of the Mongol army were disciplined “their obedience and submissiveness is such that if there be a commander of a hundred thousand between whom and the Khan there is a distance of sunrise and sunset, and if he but commit some fault, the Khan dispatches a single horseman to punish him” (Doc: 4). A document from the perspective of one of the conquered civilizations would be very useful because it would give insight on how events took place.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There were many great warriors throughout the Middle Ages, however none so prominent as the Mongols. While the Carolingian “war machine” conquered a sizable expanse of land, it was a miniscule feat when compared to the enormous empire the Mongols ultimately created. Though they prospered for a relatively short period of time, they succeeded in generating a lasting impact. The traditional stereotypes of the 13th century Mongols were influenced by stories from Russia, China, and Persia, which insinuated that the Mongols were barbaric raiders contingent upon destroying everything in their path. This perception is not entirely true, while the Mongols were still a fierce war machine,…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic people until 1206, when they acknowledged Temujin as the supreme leader, Genghis Khan. A huge empire was created under his rule, linking Eastern and Western Eurasia. An analysis of these documents will discuss the topic of how the Mongols expanded their empire so far in such a short time through their power of violence. This analysis will also show the admiration and respect of the Mongols by others in surrounding regions. Ultimately, this analysis will discuss how the fear from other people gave the Mongols their biggest advantage in conquering other regions to expand their enormous empire.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ▪ Mongol horsemen most mobile force in pre- modern world – surprise attacks on enemies…

    • 2823 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mongols were a fierce army that had the strength of a thousand wolves. The Mongols were fired by a lot of people. When the Mongols would come into a close presence of any leader, most of the leaders get suspicious because they fear that the Mongols may try to overtake them. The Mongols scared almost all people they came in counter with. The mongols were so scary and big that hired mercenaries from their enemies have even stopped and joined them because they knew they couldn't with the fight.…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through their expansion, Mongols were ruthless with conquering other empires. As a result, many who were conquered did not view them with fondness. A Hungarian bishop held two Mongols captive described them as barbaric and had no religious belief (Doc 4). Others agreed with this statement, an Italian monk called them extremely arrogant and have no moral disputes about killing people. Additionally, in terms of dealing with others, Mongols are described as crafty liars. (Doc 5). However, these intense negative feelings derive from viewing only one side of the Mongols. The bishop most likely only experienced the Mongols’ violence while the Monk was specifically pointing out their flaws.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Were the Mongols Barbaric?

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Multiple Tribes started forming as early B.C. These tribes brought new history toward us and we study them every day to find out their hidden secrets and the way they lived in the past. They brought us new technology, new ways to export and trade items. As one of the tribes began to rise to power, the Mongol’s located in China during B.C many other tribes were weaker than them. Although one could say that the Mongol’s were a strong empire, due to the faiths that they were cruel within their culture, battling, and trading, this made them barbaric.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    World History 600-1450

    • 3256 Words
    • 14 Pages

    caused the initial movement, and that the Mongol's superior ability as horsemen sustained their successes.…

    • 3256 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During his reign as emperor, Genghis Khan killed and ravaged many civilizations and villages, “He was responsible for the deaths of as many as 40 million people.” The amount of people that he is responsible for killing is inconceivable. Genghis Khan would destroy civilizations beyond repair. He wouldn’t leave a single survivor. Genghis Khan took pride in destroying his enemies. He once said, "The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters." He would not be satisfied with just defeating them in battle. He needed to make it so they could not come back from it. He took joy in truly wrecking all that his opponents stood for. He wanted to see them suffer. After Genghis Khan would destroy a village, “No living thing was spared, including small domestic animals and livestock. Skulls of men, women, and children were piled in large, pyramidal mounds.” He did not care if you were a child, he would kill you. It did not matter if you had wronged him or if you did nothing wrong. He did not even care if you could benefit him, he went to extreme measures to make an example. In order to prove a point, “Temujin's Mongols then defeated the Taichi'ut using a series of massive cavalry attacks, including having all of the Taichi'ut chiefs boiled alive.” Temujin, another name Genghis Khan, would go to extreme lengths to assert his dominance. He would use smart military tactics, and then use barbaric ways to finish them off. This would be his way of sending the message, don’t test…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 1200s, many people were affected by the violence and brutality of the Mongols. Their empire spread from northern China all the way to Russia and Europe, just on the backs of their horses. Every Mongol leader had one motive in mind - to conquer and kill. These ruthless soldiers spent their lives travelling and conquering many towns and major cities, leaving nothing behind but messages of their defeat. The Barbarians were proved to be truly ¨barbaric¨ by the writings of John of Plano Carpini, Mongolian leaders, and outlooks of non- Mongolian people.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on the history of the mongols, some believe that they were barbaric and some believed otherwise. Much land was conquered and an abundance of innocent people lost their lives on the way. Some died in ways unthinkable. On the other hand, the Mongols were also somewhat civil due to the fact that they had crimes against adultery. But overall, the Mongols were a group of barbaric animals.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Eight hundred years ago, during the 13th Century, a small tribe from the grasslands or steppes of central Asia conquered much of the known world” (background essay). Most of the world called the Mongols “barbarian” referring to people who lived beyond the reach of civilization, people who savage, evil. Were they barbarians spreading death and destruction, or is there more to the story? Cultures had both expanded through conquest and changed the dynamics of regions. The Mongols were important for their limitless empire’s stable rule, expansion of safe trade, and wicked conquest.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays