Preview

Missouri Compromise

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Missouri Compromise
The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery state representatives. The compromise involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state boundaries of the Missouri territory. In return for Missouri being a freed state, Maine was allowed to become a state separate from Massachusetts. The Events that led up to the compromise are not nearly as important as what the compromise represented; a deep rooted division of doctrine. Part of the issue surrounding Missouri as a slave state had to do with votes in Congress. When Alabama was admitted to the Union, the votes were even, thus there was no chance of slavery being abolished at the Federal level. If Missouri were admitted as a slave state, Congressional power would shift in favor of the slave states. To balance the votes of slave states and Free states, the northern region of Massachusetts was broken free and a proposal was drafted to annex it into the United States as the free state of Maine. When this proposition was brought forward, the southern states blocked it.
While one would think that this meant that there was no difference between a deadlock that forced northern states to accept slavery in the south and the south having more votes thus insuring slavery stayed the status quo, there was the west to think about. The northern states wanted the west to be kept free of slavery. The south saw business potential as slavery in western states where there was an abundance of natural resources could be profitable. The compromise reached was that both Missouri and Maine could be admitted but slavery ended geographically at the 36°30′ parallel. With the exception of Missouri, which was allowed to have slaves.
The flaws of the compromise are pretty evident. Geographical separation enforced by law did not change the attitudes of either party. Secondly, the second

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, many of the northern senators were hesitant to allow Missouri to become a slave state because there were already 11 free states and 11 slave states and the northern senators did not want too much representation from slave state senators. Also, Missouri was the the west of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers so it was not required to follow the Northwest Ordinance Act leading to the confusion of whether it was a slave state or a free state. The northern senators argued that slavery was an immoral sin and should be abolished while the southern senators argued that slavery was justified in the constitution and that they had the right to keep slaves if they wanted to. To keep a balance of pro-slavery senators and free-state senators, Henry Clay proposed the Missouri Compromise which stated that Missouri would be a slave state if Maine was accepted as a free state. It further drew the 36-30 parallel to create a division for which states would be free and which would be slave-owning.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    slave state, while also adding Maine to the nation as a free state to maintain balance. However, this compromise also states that any state north of the Mason-Dixon line, “contemplated by this act, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, forever prohibited.” It effectively divided the country by geography, and it indirectly splits people into a demographic.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fugitive Slaves Law legalized officers of the law to arrest any runaway slaves. The first major compromises reached between the slave states and the Free states to create and preserve the Union are the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act. In 1820 the Missouri Compromise was established and the unequal balance of slave states and Free states were solved by making Missouri a slave state and Maine a Free state, this compromise also divided the rest of the Louisiana Purchase into slave and free land.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and Free states. The slaveholding states feared that if they became outnumbered in Congressional representation that they would lack the power to protect their interests in property and trade.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Framers Vs Constitution

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To begin, the compromise helped settle the trade affair, giving Congress the power to lay and collect taxes and duties, and regulate national and foreign commerce within the country. Without the pact, the north and south would not agree to, and would likely reject, the Constitution, as their economies established their authority in the country. Furthermore, the compromise on slavery satisfied the demands of the south. Although the majority of the country was opposed to slavery, many southerners were financially dependent on slavery and wanted the practice to continue. By a majority of the Framers, it was accepted that the “migration and importation of slaves” were not to be prohibited by Congress prior to the year of 1808 in order to obtain the support of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, states needed to further gain support for the Constitution. Clearly, the Framers were judicious in making the tariff and slavery compromises because the agreements led to cooperation between the states regarding the US…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The divide that slavery was causing was becoming very apparent in the North and South. The southern Whigs joined the Democrats who were pro- slavery. States began threatening to leave the Union if California and New Mexico were admitted as free states. To help address this issue, the Compromise of 1850 was started. This was a ten month long debate over how to reduce the problems between the North and the South. Henry Clay was asked to help assist with finding a resolution. His proposals to the solution included allowing California into the Union as a free state, allow Utah and New Mexico to have no restrictions on slavery and letting the residents decide for themselves. He also suggested to avoid letting Texas have New Mexico, but to make…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    • 1820 - Missouri Compromise: The legislation prohibited slavery in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory above the 36°30’N latitude line, admitted Missouri to the Union as a slave state, and Maine as a free state in order to maintain the balance of slave and free states in the Senate.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Removal of the Missouri Compromise upset a decision that took place years before the case even appeared before the Supreme Court, when the United States acquired a mass of land west of the Mississippi River from France in 1803 during the Jeffersonian administration. Even though the majority of Americans believed that acquiring land was crucial to securing America’s position on the world stage, the topic of slavery in these states was still a heavily debated subject. During this time the United States had 22 states, 11 of which were free and 11 of which were slave. These states preserved a delicate balance of power in the Senate. In 1817, when Missouri requested admission into the union, this balance was threatened. Congress, in 1819, contemplated legislation that would allow Missouri to construct its own state constitution, which led James Tallmadge, a representative of New York, to add a stipulation that would ban slavery in the new state to the legislation. The amendment passed in the house, which was controlled by northern representatives, but failed to pass in the senate which was equally divided between northern and southern states. The senate adjourned without having resolved the issue. The issue of slavery in the newly acquire land led to heated debates…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages

    - Southerners, however, wouldn’t accept CA as a free state b/c it would upset the delicate balance between free and slave states – so they tried to make CA a slave state or at least extend the Missouri line.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slave owners living in Missouri did not want people to Kansas and Nebraska to become free states and if the Missouri Compromise stayed than both states would become free states, because they are both above the longitude line that decides if a state is a slave owning state or not. If both states became free states than Missouri might have been forced to change from slave owning state to free but the people from Missouri in government did not allow the development…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a bad solution, because it did not solve the slave problem but it was also a good compromise because it lasted for several years and temporarily solved the conflict of whether or not the new states would be slave states or free states. Perhaps the more important aspect of the Missouri Compromise was the agreement that no territory to the north of Missouri’s southern border could enter the Union as a slave state. That part of the compromise effectively stopped slavery from spreading into the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. The Missouri Compromise, as the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue, was also important as it set a precedent that Congress could regulate slavery in new territories and states. While the Missouri Compromise seemed to settle an issue at the time, its full impact still lay years in the future. The issue of slavery was far from settled, and further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates over it. This was meant to settle the question of slavery in the Western territories that were applying to become states of the Union. It was agreed to draw one line of latitude, north of which slavery would be illegal. The line was the Southern border of Missouri. The compromise was made to make everyone happy, it wasn’t really about the slaves but about power. There were 11 slave and 11 free states and one more state was coming into play. If the state became a slave state then the South would have had more power in the House of Representatives, than the North. If the state became a free state then the South would be weak in the House of Representatives. No one in the government or in the North wanted the South to have more power because they were afraid the country would become a slave nation and they didn’t want that. The only way to make everyone happy was the Missouri Compromise, but it was not an ideal way to settle the dispute over the expansion of slavery in the…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was effective for the southern states even though California was a slave free state in 1849 when California joined the union. (1) Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois managed to push this agreement for California to enter the Union as a free state but there were concessions made to slave owners about other acquisitions. (1)With this result the people in the southern states felt a relief of tension and a cause for celebration. This gave the southerners the right to retain slaves in those territories. (1) Congress cried “The Union is Saved!” (2) The Compromise had five bills which was intended to stave off sectional strife. The goal was on to deal with the spread of slavery to territories which in turn to keep northern and southern interests in balance. (2) One of these new bills was the Fugitive Slave Act which enlisted federal magistrates in the task of returning the runaway slaves back to their owners. (2) Another bill was New Mexico and Utah were allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issues of slavery. This meant that the people would pick whether the states would be a free or slave state. (2) Also, one of the other bills was that the slave trade be abolished in the District of Columbia. The ineffectiveness of the Compromise of 1850 was ultimately it led to a Republican victory in 1860 and to the Southern secession. Also, it led so much more animosity between the North and South.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays