Martin Luther King Vs. And Malcolm X

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two very influential men during the Civil Rights Movement. While they both were fighting for the same things, they had quite different ways of acting upon solving these problems. A lot of people see them as complete opposites, seeing as they had contrasting views on violence versus peace. Most are very familiar with King, seeing as he has his own holiday, but not many people may know what he did or was involved with other than civil rights. Both men were adamant in putting an end to segregation, but Malcolm X is known to have relied on violence to get his point across, instead of peaceful protesting. King and Malcolm X were seen as ideological opposites, and many people describe their characters based on preconceived notions, when in reality, their ideas and views converged in some areas.
One major difference between the two is their approach to protesting against segregation and unequal rights. King, known for praising peaceful protest and using tactics other than violence to fight, is a clear opposite to Malcolm X. Malcolm X, on the other hand, is known to most for his use of violence during the civil rights movement. Both men had different beliefs when it came to how to fight. “Malcolm dismissed the new nonviolent activism as misguided in its adherence to King’s nonviolent principles, but King himself realized that “‘the students had taken the struggle for justice into their own hands.’” While King admired the student’s use of nonviolent activism, Malcolm X thought the complete opposite, that nonviolence was useless. King and Malcolm X had different beliefs, and they were seen as ideological