Preview

Majoritarianism In The Government System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
921 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Majoritarianism In The Government System
In the government system there are two theories of democracy, which are majoritarian model and the pluralistic model. Both are used in governments worldwide, but they have different standards. It seems as though the United States leans towards the plurality system, but to understand more about the theories of majoritarianism and pluralism, there should be a grasp on how both theories would apply to the American politics and government. To start, there should be an understanding of the background of majoritarianism and pluralism. Thomas E. Patterson, the author of “We the People: An Introduction to American Government,” expresses majoritarianism is the majority in elections and policies. He also adds that for the most part, majoritarianism …show more content…
The political parties were formed because there is the competition with the parties, that gives well-known majorities a choice on how they will be governed. The parties were formed by our first few presidents, such as Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, John Adams and James Monroe. The Democratic party was first known as the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans, but later on became Democrats. For Republicans, they first became Federalists, then later on became Whigs and after that disintegrated, they officially became Republicans. After establishing themselves, during the Civil War, this was the only time in history did the party system fail to set aside political differences. After this event occurred, the nation had party realignments, meaning they changed their groups drastically and created patterns of competition between Democratic and Republican parties, which lasts to this day. Along the way the parties had more realignments, along with the Great Depression and from these acts. The realignments made lasting effects on elections because of voters’ long term party loyalties. From the history of the parties, today America has the electoral competition, which is centered around the Democrats and Republicans but in other countries, most democracies have a multiparty system, which is three or more parties. The United States has a plurality district system, meaning there is one single-member. The system is unfair towards minor …show more content…
majoritarianism is referring to more “by the people,” whereas pluralism is another option to function and it is through interest groups. It seems as though the theory of pluralism works better with the United States politics and government as a whole. Patterson even wrote more information based on pluralism. And yes, majoritarianism is in our government, but not like other countries around the world, who have fully adapted to the theory. Americans do not have enough interests or understanding of politics and government, so if they wanted to switch to the theory of majoritarianism, a lot of changes would have to be made. Either way, both theories majoritarianism and pluralism are a part of politics and even though both theories have pros and cons, they somehow work into the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a winner-take-all system because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes. The United States also has mostly single-member districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use multiple-member districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature. Also the way the US electoral college system is set up discourages third-party candidates. The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many reasons why America has only two major political parties. It could be the cause of the federal government. The major parties reflect its decentralized structure. Candidates are recruited at the state or local level and are responsive primarily to their own state or local constituencies. At the national level, they consist of local party representatives. This state local orientation affects the policy positions that parties take and the decisions that their elected officials make. What this really means is that we started off with a two party government and people in these parties came into power. Now that they attained the power they do not want to give it away so what the parties do is give their power to people that think just like them which would be other members in their party. On top of that it is so hard for a smaller party with no financial backing to even compete with the two monstrous parties.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Elite Theory is a theory of the state which seeks to describe and explain the power relationships in contemporary society.” Elite theory is essentially an antonym to the theory of Pluralism because Pluralists suggest democracy as a utopian idea. Elite theory is based on two major ideas, one being that “power lies in position of authority in key economic and political institutions,” and “the psychological difference that sets Elites apart is that they have personal resources, for instance intelligence and skills, and a vested interest in the government; while the rest are incompetent and do not have the capabilities of governing themselves, the elite are resourceful and will strive to make the government work. For in reality, the elite have the most to lose in a failed government.”…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States, in its policies, indicates that it is a democracy. In my comprehension of the whole structure, I perceive that it is a republic in which the people choose representatives who decide on their own on policies and furthermore. I believe that the people of the United States would prefer and benefit more from a democratic system. A democratic system would still mean having representatives but they would be “from the people to the people”. They would be fully representing the people by having meetings and gatherings with them to know what they need, want, and to be informed with their input on current issues, because after all it is they who the representatives are representing. These groups would of course be…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of this, parties naturally form. In the United States, the formation can be traced to before The Constitution and the dispute over strong versus weak government, and continued to develop through the early years of the new government. Once the Constitution was established debates arose on several fronts. Whether it was through financial planning, distribution of power, or potentially unlawful treaties, tensions between the ideals of the two groups were enflamed. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were often so polarized that coming to compromises could be difficult, much to the chagrin of others, including Washington. However, they cannot be completely credited with forming the two-party system. Other politicians contributed, and at times the division was just the natural product of the circumstance. Also, they are not entirely the reason the system has persevered over time. Instead, the nature of elections in the United States have caused the two-party system to be maintained. All this being said, whether Hamilton and Jefferson are entirely to blame, they also proved that dissension is not always bad. It allows for different ideas to be heard and compromises to be made. Through their disagreements they produced innovation that has shaped the nation. This party system, though it has shifted and swapped over the years, still stands. The effects of these men run so deep that…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Parties have been in the United States since 1796. A big question that has been asked many time is. Why did America form political parties? This is because a lot of the candidates have many different views as seen in document one which is a chart that shows the differences between Hamilton and Jefferson. When theses…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Governmental issues are rising in our nation, especially recently with the presidential race being in session. Republicans and democrats are discussing and even arguing about which candidate would be most fitting for the seat of the President of the United States. The United States is not considered a totalitarian government but described as totalitarianism. “Bearing in mind that totalitarianism is first and foremost about power, we can see that the ideas of imagination and of the imaginary, while pointing toward the fanciful, are power-laden terms, striking because they seem to join power, fantasy, and unreality.” (Wolin) This is what this country is supposed to…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthesis Argument

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Government is defined by the Webster Dictionary as "the system by which a state or community is governed." In America that system is democracy. It is a system which allows for personal freedom and the ability for one individual to make a difference. Democracy will by definition always follow the will of the majority. John Adams declares that "the form of government which communicates ease, comfort, security, or, in one word, happiness, to the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is the best." Democracy ensures that by giving people the chance to have their say in the public arena. They participate intimately in politics but give elected leaders to stand in for them on the day to day details.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Majoritarian Analysis

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page

    Majoritarian portrays “government by the people” which mean government by some of the people. This model depends on the people’s participation by electing their representatives of their choice. During the voting period, there are three principles of procedural democratic theory which consist of universal participation, political equality and majority rules. Universal participation, that everyone should participate in the decision-making processes. Political equality is making one vote per person and all the votes counted equally. Majority rule is when all the votes are tallied and the winner is decided by get more than fifty percent. Majoritarian also provides the people with initiatives, initiatives are petition that registered votes must…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand, pluralistic democracy doesn’t rely on what the majority of the people want. Pluralistic democracy is best understood through the generalization that power is relatively distributed among interest groups in society, which compete with one another to control public policy. Some groups tend to dominate in one or two issue areas, while other groups and interests tend to dominate in other issue areas. There tends to be little overlap between those leaders who participate more in certain policy application areas than others and what linkage there is. This tends to come from popularly elected political officials such as party leaders who, by the nature of their jobs, must exercise leadership in a number of different policy…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political parties(Democratic Republicans and Federalists) started in the United States because of differing views between two important leaders and newspapers which took sides.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays