Preview

Leviathan Essay

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1681 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leviathan Essay
“To make Covenant with bruit Beasts, is impossible; because not understanding our speech, they understand not, nor accept of any translation of Right; nor can translate any Right to another; and without mutual acceptation, there is no Covenant.” This insightful observation was made by Thomas Hobbes a 17th Century English philosopher was the first to coin the phrase social contract in his seminal book Leviathan. The notion of the social contract was found in the Leviathan. This paper will address attitudes of the 21st Century that undermine the social contract and threaten the nature of the Leviathan.
The word Leviathan conjures up images of a mythical beast with unlimited power overthrowing, transgressing every conceivable good idea of humanity,
…show more content…
Subsequently, these rights are guaranteed by the government and the government is granted power by the faith of the people as it is by faith that the transfer of power in initiated. Hobbes propose that faith in the government and its performance in upholding it part of the contract as vital to the maintenance of the contract stating “being trusted, his performance is called Keeping Of Promise, or Faith; and the failing of performance (if it is voluntary) Violation Of Faith.” It could be stated that the faith in the U.S. is at an all time low but the would constitute an understatement of biblical proportions Gallup an American research company reported “WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' confidence in all three branches of the U.S. government has fallen, reaching record lows for the Supreme Court (30%) and Congress (7%), and a six-year low for the presidency (29%). The presidency had the largest drop of the three branches this year, down seven percentage points from its previous rating of 36%.” Furthermore, obstructionist politics has brought the political system to a grinding halt which is best illustrated by the New York Times article Another Impasse on Gun Bills, Another Win for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Leviathan, the state of nature is a public without government. There are no agencies to recognize authority or to judge disputes, and there is no power to be enforced. There cannot be injustice or personal property because there are no laws. It is the state where humans are equal in body and mind, no one is invincible…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Foltz, F. A., Mitcham, E. C. (2005) Social Contract Theory. Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, (pp1796-1800) Detroit: Macmillian Reference USA.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes begins Leviathan with Book 1: Of Man, in which he builds, layer by layer, a foundation for his eventual argument that the "natural condition" of man, or one without sovereign control, is one of continuous war, violence, death, and fear.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Carrie Buck

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory." 15 October 2004. International Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1 November 2010 .…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That men are sinister in the State of Nature could be promoted as a headline to Hobbes’s magnum opus, Leviathan. In the state of nature, men are not magnanimous beings. A notion similar to the first sin, yet different from a philosopher like Jean Jacque Rousseau. It has always been taken for granted that there are wicked and virtuous humans, yet for Hobbes, humans are innately wicked. These notions, however abstract and contradictory they may seem, are demonstrated in this short paper; Hobbes’s chapter 13 of Leviathan is abridged in this paper. First, the inclinations that drive men to behave in a wicked way are outlined step by step. Then Hobbes’s reason for having a common power is established. Generally, this paper is a reflection on Chapter 13 of Leviathan with explanation and commentary.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is interesting to note that in the U.S. the trend has been toward religiosity increasingly intervening into government activity. The Constitution does not mention God but in 1892 the Supreme Court stated “This is a Christian nation”. 1 In 1952, at the height of the Communist fervor, the Supreme Court was more inclusive: “we are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being”2. Congress declared “In God We Trust” as the national motto in 1956 and two years earlier had inserted “one nation under God” into the pledge of allegiance. 3 Religion has encroached ever since.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay 3

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shelley shows the idea that societies corruption lead to the monstrosity of the creature. The creature describes how he ‘was benevolent’ but now because humanity ‘spurn and hate’ him he has turned to acts of evil. Shelley is showing how all humans start out good and Shelley alludes to the fact the creature is human. The creater’s corruption is also shown though Frankenstein’s abandonment of his ‘duty’ towards the creature. Frankenstein’s want to ‘extinguish the spark’ with which he created shows a…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diagnostic Essay

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    imagines a “state of nature” out of which he institutes the “social contract.” Discuss the…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argues that the social contract between man and government allows man to exit the state of nature and enter the state of law. Each man comprises the body of the Leviathan, with only the head…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, there are numerous references to the emotion of fear in human nature and it’s effects as one of the defining principles of human interaction. It helps set up a foundation of sorts for some of the main points of Hobbes’ liberal view on the governing body of society and a basis for the “Social Contract Theory”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is known as a land of equals and a land “of the free.” From separation of powers to check and balances, the Founding Fathers displayed a desire for equilibrium, rather than for usurpation. Although the three branches of government display equality, the development of the legislative branch over time- i.e. the shift of delegation powers- has shown that Congress holds the most power making final decisions through impeachment, oversights, and accepting or denying presidential requests- i.e. treaties and the appointment of judges.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein Essay

    • 1720 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley brings about the debate between nature versus nurture. Mentioned by Dan Hurley in his work, Trait vs. Fate, is a little story that involves this topic. "Two alcoholic mice, a mother and her son, sit on two bar stools, lapping gin from two thimbles. The mother mouse looks up and says, "Hey geniuses, tell me how my son got into this sorry state." "Bad inheritance," says Darwin. "Bad mothering," says Freud." (Hurley, Trait Vs. Fate.). Philosophers and Scientists alike have, for centuries, argued whether a person's character is the result of nature, meaning genetic predispositions, or nurture, meaning life experiences, the way in which one is taught and how their development is affected by the environment surrounding them. In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes, an English Philosopher, claims that human beings exist in a state of nature and are naturally savage and brutal. On the other hand, John Locke, also an English Philosopher, in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, argues that every being is born with a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and their character traits and behaviors result from their personal life encounters. In Frankenstein, Shelley attempts to, through many different interactions, express that because of Victor's failings as a creator and parent, the monster's isolation, and society's reaction to the monster, the creature became evil. The monster's character was a result of the way in which he was nurtured. He was not innately evil directly from birth.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utopia And Leviathan

    • 2202 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Leviathan and Utopia contain faults in logic that work to undermine the very possibility for these new social structures. In the following I will show how each of their views for a new society give insight into what their beliefs of human nature are, while showing some similarities between them. I will point to some of the faults found with both of their arguments that suggest an implicit and at times contradictory view of mankind.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays