Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Leni Riefenstahl Propagandist or Artist?

Good Essays
496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leni Riefenstahl Propagandist or Artist?
Leni Riefenstahl: Documentary Film-Maker or Propaganda?

1. Her directorial debut, “Blue Light”, caught Hitler’s attention. 2. Whether “Triumph of the Will” and “Olympia” should be considered ‘documentaries’ or ‘propaganda films’. 3. She says that TOW doesn’t contain a single reconstructed scene, or tendentious commentary. Everything is true and purely historical. She believes that propaganda is recreating events in order to illustrate a thesis. 4. Many forms ranging from attempts to influence public to covert means of persuasion linked with brainwashing. 5. He felt that entertainment was the best propaganda and, as a result, 90% of films had no overt propaganda messages. He wanted films not to focus on emotion and entertainment rather than facts. 6. She said that she was involved in the planning however in 1993 she claimed she was not. She says she merely observed and filmed stating that the idea that she planned and designed was ‘absurd’. 7. Builds up to climatic frenzied finale when Hitler takes the stand. Creating message of power and significance surrounding Hitler. 8. Financed by the Nazi government and commissioned by Hitler himself. 9. Artistic representation of the ideas in Hitler’s book Mein Kampf – work, extreme nationalism, belief in corporative state socialism, a private army, a youth cult, the use of propaganda and the submission of all decisions to the supreme leader. 10. There is no commentator to explain everything. It is a work of art. 11. Not only the messages in the film slanted towards Nazi beliefs and ideals, but also the mise-en-scene, editing and music which all combine to create a hypnotic and visually rich emotional experience, which would undoubtedly have influence people. 12. Film slated as propaganda and Riefenstahl blacklisted ending her career as a film-maker. 13. The fact that a certain subject has been chosen involves an interpretation of what should be shot and the manipulation of time and space in the interest of tension and storytelling. 14. Controversy surrounding how the commission for filming was given. There are conflicting stories with Riefenstahl claiming that she was approached by an International Committee coordinating the games, however unearthed material has led to the discovery that it was Hitler who suggested the idea. 15. The main criticism is that the film focuses more on the glorification of the human form rather than the actual sporting events. 16. The messages in Olympia are not political as is the case in “Triumph of the Will”. 17. However, there are several elements of propaganda in the film. Idea of perfect Aryan-German race of athletic supremacy and Hitler’s ideology of a Youth Cult which emphasises sports and paramilitary outdoor activities. The film aimed at the young with the ethos of ‘this is what you could be with hard work and exercise’. 18. Susan Sontag’s view was that Riefenstahl was an artist whose personal preoccupations were primarily artistic and technical, not political, however used by Hitler and the Nazi party for their own political gains.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Leni Reifenstahl

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When considering the above thesis statement, 2 differing perspectives arise. The first supports the thesis and is that Riefenstahl was so driven to be worldly famous and recognised that she didn’t care what the cost. The second objects the thesis and is that Riefenstahl could not have possibly predicted the purpose and effects of her films, or Hitler’s intentions for world domination.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The values and attitudes evolving from the issues raised in this movie is conveyed to viewers through a variety of filmic conventions such as selection of shots, dialogue, camera angles, music and symbolism.…

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Purple Rose of Cairo

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Film has captured and enchanted audiences since its origination with the Lumiere Brothers; and, as it developed, it began to be used to convey messages and ideas. Film started to become a creative outlet that then turned to a catalyst of philosophical thought. Film theorist Sergei Einstein expressed that film “as a work of art, understood dynamically, is just the process of arranging images in the feelings and mind of the spectator”. Thus, directors began to realize that audience manipulation was possible through the images and sounds they delivered, as well as through the way these images and sounds were presented-- it all has an effect of how viewers thought of and interpreted the films. This is especially clear in the German film, Triumph of Will, directed by Leni Reifenstahl. While the film is brilliantly made, with moving cameras, the utilization of long focus lenses, aerial photography, and a revolutionary approach to musical accompaniment, the film was also incredibly propagandistic and manipulative at the time of it’s release. The entire film is a vehicle to promote the ideologies of Hitler; beginning with Germany’s near-destruction in World War I and depicting Hitler as a messiah, descending from the skies to greet his vehement followers. In the opening minutes of the film, there are close-up and over-the-shoulder shots of Hitler, making him seem rather personable, adored, and somewhat noble. There are also shots of children approaching him, showing that the ideas of innocence and purity are to be seen as parallel to the views and goals Hitler himself. Aesthetically, the entire film is superbly done, and politically its manipulative powers are astonishing. By showing Germany as unified under the divine rule of Hitler, it brought the nation together and created one of the most destructive and powerful nations in the 1940s.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hitler established a Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda which was headed by Joseph Goebbels. The plan for this ministry was to ensure the Nazi message was communicated correctly through art, music, theater, films, books, radio, educational materials, and the press. Hitler and Goebbels believed that film was an excellent way to change public opinion. The anti-Semitic German Nazi propaganda film “The Eternal Jew” did a great job of this. Goebbels played a major roll in the production of this film. This was significant because he had only done this for a few other Nazi propaganda films. At the beginning of the film the viewers are told that the documentary portrays Jews in their natural state. Even though the film was advertised as authentic in its portrayal of Jews, this was not the case at all. This was another case of manipulation for the purposes of propaganda. The Nazi’s were able to use this film to claim that the Jews were dangerous aggressors that would need to be exterminated.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Triumph of the will’ is a film of the 1934 Nazi Rally at Nuremburg. It was directed by Leni Riefenstahl and funded by the Nazi party. The question of whether Triumph of the Will was created for the purpose of Nazi propaganda or simply as a documentary has provoked historical debate. There is no doubt that the film was used as propaganda, as when the Nazi’s annexed Austria, triumph of the will was streamed in every cinema to convert the disillusioned Austrians into practising Nazis. However, historians have questioned the intentions of the film’s creator. Leni Riefenstahl was found to be a Nazi Sympathiser by the French in 1950, but, her reluctance to accept that the film was created as propaganda has triggered a debate among historians which has continued beyond Leni’s death.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leni Riefenstahl

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Leni Riefenstahl, a dazzling individual that has lived through and experienced many things that no other person may have. She has lived through the World War One, Great Depression, Nazi Germany, World War Two, the Cold war and September 11. However, what fascinates historians and people all over was her involvement and relationship with Hitler and the Nazis party. This report will look over Leni's early to role as director of her Infamous films Triumph of the Will and Olympia and her involvement and view of Nazism and Hitler.…

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of the images in the movie and the music/marching bands was the main effective elements of the film. It helped in convincing the audience to continue watching the film and in some ways makes them believers. In the movie, Hitler was seen giving two short speeches that were sharp in language. Other than the marching bands and the speeches, there weren’t anything else to see in this movie. The ending of the movie show Hitler addressing and audience in a huge hall. At no time did I see where the group of people went after the speech. The movie clearly shows the power that Hitler had and how he use it to convince his people to join his movement of having only one political party the “Nazis”. It is one the greatest propaganda films…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leni Riefenstahl, a director and actor of abundant of films has become one of the sole artists recognized completely with the Nazi era. Her directed film, Triumph of the Will is a leading film, which was conducted during the Nazi era and is considered to be the greatest propaganda film to date. Riefenstahl nevertheless, did and continues to proclaim the film to be a documentary based on ‘pure history’. In response to Riefenstahl, Susan Sontag’s article, Fascinating Fascism, indicates the film to be nothing more than ‘pure propaganda and fascist’. Robin Wood author of the article Fascism/Cinema, concurs with Susan Sontag’s response. While exquisite use of film techniques may guild viewer to presume otherwise, Susan Sontag asserts Riefenstahl’s…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The same story told at different times may bring out different aspects of the story. In one time period, a film shows the horrors of war and in another time period, the same subject matter might show nationalism. The audience needs to examine the historical accuracy of a “documentary film." Many times the biases of the creator will make the film more propaganda than non-fiction. Faking and staging of newsreel films during times of war to make a point was common; for example, the picture of the raising of the flag over Iwo Jima was actually the second time the flag flew on Mount Suribachi. Finally, the audience should determine if items were left out of the film and investigate why. The format of the film industry itself has also caused changes in the film. Independent film companies may have different views of a film compared to major film…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film by Leni Riefenstahl's, Triumph of the Will (1934) is an important part of history that is important to screen as a college course because it allows students to engage in critical thinking and assessment. Therefore, from a film point of view, Triumph of the Will (1934) through elements of mise en scène created a film promoting Nazi ideology through camera angles, sound, and creative editing. Film and media play a big part on influencing audiences to a desired ideology through visual persuasion, such as displaying a tranquil environment displaying clouds, flags, people such as crowds and youth men as future military, and Germany architecture of buildings. The diegetic sound in the film consist of marching tunes to Horst-Wessel-Lied songs…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. Take an example of a film, TV programme, piece of journalism, photograph, novel etc and discuss the…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cinematography masterpiece created by Leni Riefenstahl was successful as propaganda not only because it was in the form of a film, which could easily spread to the masses and play to their emotions, but due to Riefenstahl’s superb cinematography. This cinematographic prowess enabled the film to successfully imprint ideas which would not have reached the viewers had it been filmed differently. Riefenstahl manipulated the camera cuts and the light in such a way that it alluded to certain messages and got the uneducated, but absorbent masses to believe the ideas about Hitler and the Nazi Party that Hitler wanted. For instance, one of the first cuts of the film is shot from inside a plane,…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When assessing the film Olympia from a seemingly naïve glance, it can easily be perceived as a film successful in capturing the beauty and spirit of the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games. Without taking into consideration the political context of the time, it is easy to assume that Leni Riefenstahl’s film Olympia is merely a work of art focused on expressing the artist’s artistic vision. Instead, I found it is when you analyze the film with knowledge of the surrounding political context when you start to…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This film was on the edge of becoming a documentary, but is classified mostly as a propaganda film, and so it was true, real-life events, portrayed and “staged”. Although the Nuremberg conference would have taken place, whether the film was or not, preparations for the conference were carefully arranged around the filming of the movie. Leni Riefenstahl claimed that she knew nothing of the objectives of the Nuremberg Rally. The film was financed by the Nazi government and commissioned by Hitler himself. The film reached and influenced far more people than originally expected.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler’s dogged determination for power was because of the people he had associated with, the books, magazines and newspapers he read and his passion for German nationalism. Born in April 20th, 1889, third of five children, to Alois Hitler and Klara Polzl, greatly influenced by family upbringing for his obsessed power struggle for German nationalism. His contact with the likes of Georg Schonerer and Karl Lueger’s anti-Semitism writings and rhetoric also spurred him to action and instrumental in his struggle for power. Hitler’s mentor Dietrich Eckart was responsible and influential in his spirited power strife. As an avid reader he was touched and more ferocious in warfare, as he read the picture book about the France-Prussian war, from among his father’s belongings. He gained more momentum after reading the Ostara Magazine about anti-Semitism and his interest in the inspirational writings of Luther. The local newspaper Deutsches Volksblatt hardens his heart and boldness when he read the paper. The racial matrixes in Germany give him a strong spell for German hegemony and sovereignty. His political views and ambitions nurtured and spiced his nationalistic interest. In his maverick nature he rebelled against his father for serving in the Austrian government to demonstrate his stand in the German nationality. In the following paragraphs Hitler’s tenacious and firm intention for power in Germany will be discussed in detail.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays