Leadership Assessment: Sample Of The Battle Of Rape Matapan
LEADERSHIP QUALITIES
BATTLE OF CAPE MATAPAN
This was a large scale Naval action which was happened after the twenty-five years of the time of that era. At the end of March 1941 under the pressure of German, the Italian fleet planned to launch an attack on British fleet. The purpose of that attack was to stop convoys supplying to the British expeditionary forces in Greece. Before this attack happened, he was able to analyze the situation with the Italy entry to the war and capitulation of France. He realized the threat and relocated his headquarters to the Alexandria in Egypt by showing his famous vision “gain control of the Sea and keep it” that was one example that showed his quality of vision, forethought and imagination the future happenings. …show more content…
Tactical victory and strategic Effect. He understood the importance of the victory.
b. Doctrinal Value. When the night falls, he may had to get away his fleet from the enemy, but he did opposite of that. He shows the operation commanders ability of exercise art rather than science, which will deliver strategic effects.
c. Decisiveness. He was firm, but that sometimes not accepted by all.
d. Understanding Technologies. He was able to utilize all the capabilities which he had …show more content…
They captured airfield in western Crate and that were benefitted to them for future operations. After a week of heavy fighting, British commanders suggested to withdrawn. So the evacuation was carried out and Cunningham’s ships suffered a lot of damages. But he was determined that “Navy must not let the army down” and as a Naval officer shown the dedication, confidence, commitment and accountability of his works. Though the Army Generals were feared to evacuate and loosing of ships, he never got back. Because of that attitude of him and his men 85% of men in Create were rescued.(out of 22000 men 16500 rescued ) and he lost three Cruisers and six destroyers. The operational level leadership lessons learnt from the battle of Create can be summarized as follows.
a. Personal Touch. He demonstrated that his personal touch with the men of his fleet, talking to him, walking among them, boosting morale by his presence.
b. Joint leadership. His most of actions were trusted his subordinate admirals at sea and recognized the critical importance of being accessible to other environmental C in C’s and to London. This is an illustration of the balancing act between institutional and tactical
BATTLE OF CAPE MATAPAN
This was a large scale Naval action which was happened after the twenty-five years of the time of that era. At the end of March 1941 under the pressure of German, the Italian fleet planned to launch an attack on British fleet. The purpose of that attack was to stop convoys supplying to the British expeditionary forces in Greece. Before this attack happened, he was able to analyze the situation with the Italy entry to the war and capitulation of France. He realized the threat and relocated his headquarters to the Alexandria in Egypt by showing his famous vision “gain control of the Sea and keep it” that was one example that showed his quality of vision, forethought and imagination the future happenings. …show more content…
Tactical victory and strategic Effect. He understood the importance of the victory.
b. Doctrinal Value. When the night falls, he may had to get away his fleet from the enemy, but he did opposite of that. He shows the operation commanders ability of exercise art rather than science, which will deliver strategic effects.
c. Decisiveness. He was firm, but that sometimes not accepted by all.
d. Understanding Technologies. He was able to utilize all the capabilities which he had …show more content…
They captured airfield in western Crate and that were benefitted to them for future operations. After a week of heavy fighting, British commanders suggested to withdrawn. So the evacuation was carried out and Cunningham’s ships suffered a lot of damages. But he was determined that “Navy must not let the army down” and as a Naval officer shown the dedication, confidence, commitment and accountability of his works. Though the Army Generals were feared to evacuate and loosing of ships, he never got back. Because of that attitude of him and his men 85% of men in Create were rescued.(out of 22000 men 16500 rescued ) and he lost three Cruisers and six destroyers. The operational level leadership lessons learnt from the battle of Create can be summarized as follows.
a. Personal Touch. He demonstrated that his personal touch with the men of his fleet, talking to him, walking among them, boosting morale by his presence.
b. Joint leadership. His most of actions were trusted his subordinate admirals at sea and recognized the critical importance of being accessible to other environmental C in C’s and to London. This is an illustration of the balancing act between institutional and tactical