Preview

Korematsu vs. the United States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1908 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu vs. the United States
Abstract
I chose the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States for this research paper. Back on December 7, 1941 the Japanese attacked US Naval forces in Pearl Harbor located in Hawaii. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. Executive Order 9066 was put into place by President Roosevelt and this order made it possible to put anyone from full Japanese to even 1/16th into special facilities where they were seclude from the general population. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Fred Korematsu was a native born citizen of the US, but was of Japanese heritage and he was convicted on September 8, 1942 of being in a place where Japanese weren’t allowed. Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court and in a 6-3 vote they sided with the government, because they said that the potential spying and espionage was more important than Korematsu’s Constitutional rights. From my research I have concluded that even though Korematsu got his case overturned in 1984 because of untruthful information it was still unfair that it is still deemed Constitutional that there were internment camps for Japanese-Americans. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper.

The Korematsu v. United States was argued on October 11 and 12, 1944 and was decided on December 18, 1944 (Touro College, 1997). Justice Black delivered the Court 's opinion. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American citizen was arrested and convicted of staying in a "Military Area" in San Leandro, California



References: Chemerinsky, Erwin. "Korematsu v. United States: A Tragedy Hopefully Never to Be Repeated - Pepperdine Law Review." Pepperdine Law Review. Digital Commons, 15 Dec. 2011. Web. 03 May 2014. http://pepperdinelawreview.com/korematsu-v-united-states-a-tragedy-hopefully-never-to-be-repeated/ FindLaw. (2004). U.S. Supreme Court. Toyosaburo Korematsu v. UNITED STATES, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=323&invol=214 Jackson, Robert. "Fred Korematsu." The Robert H. Jackson Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 May 2014. http://www.roberthjackson.org/the-man/speeches-articles/articles/remembering-korematsu/fred-korematsu/ Konkoly, Toni. "Famous Dissents." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 02 May 2014. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/personality/landmark_korematsu.html Randall, Vernellia R. (2004, April 11). Internment of Japanese Americans in Concentration Camps. Retrieved April 17, 2014, from http://academic.udayton.edu/race/02rights/intern01.htm#Korematsu Smart, Chris. "Rights Violated to Japanese Americans." Rights Violated to Japanese Americans. Senate Publication 1028-s ( P. 30-34), 02 May 2000. Web. 01 May 2014. http://online.sfsu.edu/jaintern/rightsviolated.html Touro College. (1997). Korematsu v. United States. Retrieved April 29, 2014, from http://tlc-patch.tourolaw.edu/patch/CaseSummary.asp#Korematsu

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Summary - Fred Korematsu refused to obey the wartime order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans. He was arrested and convicted. After losing in the Court of Appeals, he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the deportation order.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    their ethnicity. That is not what America stands for and we should never approve of…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu vs. US

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fred Korematsu went apart from the others who obeyed the order of the president and through an attempt of disguise, tried to stay in his homeland. He was a U.S. citizen, and therefore knew he had his rights just like everyone else and that no one could take them away from him. Korematsu was grabbed by police, handcuffed, and taken to jail. His crime was identified as defying President Franklin D. Roosevelt's order of American citizens of Japanese descent reporting to the special camps. Korematsu ended up challenging his conviction in the courts by saying that Congress, the President, and the military authorities did not have the power to issue the relocation orders and that he was being discriminated against based on his race. The Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu’s basic constitutional rights. The fourth amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    FindLaw. (June 17, 1976 Decided). U.S. Supreme Court, KLEPPE v. NEW MEXICO, 426 U.S. 529 (1976). Retrieved from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin-getcase.pl?court=us&vol=426&invol=529…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A special bulletin on the radio announced that the Japanese had mounted a surprise air attack on the U.S. Naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii” (Carnes 95). This action against the United States on December 7, 1941 by Japan cause racial prejudice and unrest in the United States. This event also lead to the making of laws that caused the creation of Japanese internment camps. The War Relocation Authority attempted to justify their actions against Japanese Americans in a couple of ways. “The action taken with respect to Japanese in this country is justifiable on the grounds of military necessity for several reasons” (Carnes 97). One reason that is stated is that “All Japanese look very much alike to a white person...” (Carnes 97).…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right after the attacks, some 2,000 men were arrested because they were seen as immediate threats. Despite the fact that no proof was ever given for Japanese espionage, many Americans still insisted it was a “military necessity” (Sunquist). Many people recognized the wrong in isolating the Japanese, but still rested on their prejudiced opinions. Knowing that citizens saw the unconstitutionality of the situation goes on to prove the motivation for internment camps: fear, war hysteria, and prejudice. The Japanese Americans were given one week to pack up their old life before they were transported to the assembly centers. Extra clothes, bedding, and whatever else they could carry were among the little that the Japanese could bring with them. Not only were the Japanese ripped away from their lives and forced to live new ones, but they had a limited amount of time to do so and could only bring whatever was suitable for their captors. Removing Japanese Americans from their homes was unnecessary in itself, but not only that, they couldn’t feel at home where they were going. They lived in assembly centers for six months while the U.S. hastily built ten internment camps that were located at fairground parking lots or horse stalls that had housed horses up to a week before the arrival of the Japanese Americans (Candela). Forcing people to leave their homes is an injustice in itself, but forcing people to leave their homes and move into ramshackles is even worse. However, when the detainees arrived at the assembly centers, everything was confiscated from them including “cameras, baseball bats, and even popguns”…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A redundant act of tyranny was breached upon the rights Japanese Americans based upon Executive Order 9066. This act caused the relocation of about 110,000 people with Japanese ancestry. Approximately 60% of the people that were relocated were U.S citizens with Japanese ancestry. The people that were interned would be told that they were in these camps for their own protection. Then again we must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like there was spies among us. When Executive order 9066 was signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt all Japanese American were forced to evacuate all throughout the west coast. Another thing to take into consideration is that in Hawaii no actions such as Executive Order 9066 was taken, and one third of Hawaii's population was Japanese Americans at the time. Basically all that the Executive Order 9066 did was take away innocent people's houses, businesses, and strip them of their basic rights just because of their ancestry.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the declaration, rumors spread that the Japanese-Americans were plotting against the nation (History.com). The fear of sabotage resulted in President Franklin D. Roosevelt to sign the “Executive Order 9066” (History.com). The executive order ruled that all Japanese-Americans are to evacuate the West Coast (History.com). The census from 1940 reported that 120,000 people were living in the United States were from a Japanese ancestry (History.com). All of the 120,000 Japanese-Americans were told they would be relocated (History.com). According to a descendant of a Japanese-American sent to an internment camp, “[her grandmother] sold nearly all of their belongings at big discounts, and each packed the two small suitcases they were allowed for relocation” (Nelson). The Japanese-Americans were confined by barbed-wire fences and the camps were patrolled by soldiers (Nelson). They were to live with the lack of comfort and basic qualities that a normal home possess (Nelson). In early 1945, Japanese-Americans were allowed to return to the West Coast (History.com). The last camp was closed in March 1946 due to the Supreme Court cases known as “Hirabayashi v. United States” and Korematsu v. United States” (History.com). To make amends with the mistake of “Executive Order 9066,” Congress gave twenty thousand dollars to each survivor of the camps in 1988 (History.com). Ashlyn Nelson stated that…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Americans on the west coast were interned into camps for many reasons that violated their civil Liberties, some including the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the president then declaring war on Japan, with that causing war hysteria. Japanese Americans should have been given a fair chance to bring down the accusations made by non Japanese Americans.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equality under the law, while guaranteed to American Citizens, has hardly been enforced throughout history and many people have faced discrimination in spite of it throughout the United States.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays